9 Comments

  1. Mikahel
    8 December 2011 @ 15:05

    Too bad there were too late (shame because a new great war seems inevitable) and too bad that man (we all not only the powers that be) They are still so selfish and materialistic to be able to cooperate in a new era.

    Reply

  2. Mitch Jodethe
    17 April 2011 @ 22:17

    Possible solution to the fuel/air pollution problem

    Goodmorning everyone. I believe there is a solution that will solve 3 problems in a.

    The compressed air car:

    1) drastic decrease in air pollution

    2) Will have a ridiculous cost-cost and therefore will raise the purchasing power of those who buy it (As for fuel it spends an average citizen to his car? and a company for its car fleet? municipalities?)

    3) Deletes the global problem of finding space to produce, store, carrying fuel.

    explanatory video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vq6KV5ZUiQM

    They are already selling them in dual-fuel mode for now:
    http://www.mdi.lu/english/
    click on 4 types of cars down to see the consumption and sales prices

    Italian site specializes where inquire:
    http://www.autoariacompressa.com/

    Reply

  3. A scientific materialist
    3 March 2009 @ 20:38

    I agree:
    on avoiding unnecessary pollution
    on avoiding an immense flow of money always towards the usual counts to the Cayman.
    On making human civil sustainable.
    But it is not changing enrgetica source that you can do!
    Even when the ITER project (international thermonuclear experimental reactor) will be built, It is so working as to allow a widespread production of energy from the atomic fusion the fundamental problem of our civilization is not solved .
    The whole world is ruled by money.
    But money is accepted at birth for tacit approval by all.
    Money and therefore profit is the reason for the unustenability of the company , not the energy source that is used in the production (or in locomotion).
    People have nothing to eat because food costs too much and not because there is little.
    With all the food that is produced by the whole humanit, They can live fairly well 12 billion people (FAO estimates).
    The same abundance of products involving any portion of the world market, However, only a small part of the population has access to most of these products, so that for most will be destroyed (think of the oranges crushed with bulldozers).
    It makes sense to all this?
    It acquires a sense considering that the conception that is the basis of the whole world company is the following:
    A)I'm starving, please give me to eat.
    b)How much money do you have?
    A)These 5 €
    b)They are not enough.
    A)But the food you have are going bad.
    b)As you lower the price if I have I give you free I have to rot and throw.

    This is the moral of this society .
    An energy source can not change it.
    To adopt a production that is not motivated by profit,
    but it is motivated by meeting the needs of our species
    To prevent humanities from starving by looking at a showcase full of desserts
    We must eliminate the profit.
    To eliminate profit, the division of the company in classes must be eliminated
    To eliminate the division into classes must make a communist revolution.
    The communist revuzuzuione produces a new social organization in which:
    the means of production are collective (Today they are private properties)
    Man as a species will be freed from need.
    This is communism,
    not an ideology,
    not a dictatorship
    I a “real movement which abolishes the present state of things”.
    Communism is not a state organization,
    Because the absence of the state is independent.
    Communism is not a dictatorship,
    because it is independent of the absence of division into classes.
    Communism is not represented by any historical event because now the whole world would be free of the profit and therefore the wages.

    Reply

  4. dduck
    9 December 2008 @ 23:57

    hello Palmerini
    but this economic technology ?
    and it is already widespread industrially ?
    logically being a solar technology, through photosynthesis, Huge surfaces would be needed to make the energy necessary for the transport of the Italian vehicles ?
    we have these surfaces ?
    nn they would impact on the environment ?
    Thank you

    Reply

  5. dduck
    9 December 2008 @ 00:42

    Salve
    the problem of these biotechnology is the area occupied
    If you remove space for agriculture, the cost of the menga is
    and the rapeseed oil costs little because it is taxed, if you were to spread as techn competitive status is that stratasserebbe !!!!

    Reply

  6. Beniamino
    1 April 2008 @ 14:02

    I have read the various considerations with interest and I can say that surely the biodiesel can be a partial alternative to diesel. Biodiesel derived from “plants” type of Palma, Colza, soy, Jatropha, more ecc. via squeezing of the seeds and treatment of transesterification to remove the glycerine and make biodiesel suitable for Diesel cycle engines. The production of biodiesel per hectare of Jatropha can give 700 kg and addition of fuel / year. But for consumption at the current level of fossil fuels, replacement with fuels “natural” It imposes a drastic change in the world in’ interpret these possibilities without, as it has happened to us, that this opportunity gives the consequence of unjustified increases of foods such as bread etc.. However, the moment in which we will have to slam the nose with a very heavy reality is not far and we hope that the political forces is all’ height (In Italy, however, there is no hope with our green “No” ALL). So clean nuclear energy and low-power electrical machines(less consumption and fewer accidents and zero pollution)
    Beniamino

    Reply

  7. Paul B.
    25 March 2008 @ 08:36

    4000 American soldiers dead, billions of dollars spent and to be spent in a lost war, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilian casualties, US-blown economic recession.
    And all this continues despite having the decisive alternative “Biodiesel from Algae”?
    I, too, I heard about it and I can only say to be very careful to misinformation devious web.
    I agree with Stephen…

    Paul B.

    Reply

  8. loris
    25 March 2008 @ 03:42

    Your right considerations do not apply to the production of bio-oil from algae in the middle of the desert as the video shows CNN

    Reply

  9. stefano
    24 March 2008 @ 12:59

    I wanted to make a couple of clarifications.

    Staying on the theme of biodiesel (Canola or Palma it), with current tecnice, It would not be enough to use the entire cultivable area of ​​all of Italy to cover the 10% Italian fuel requirement… for which it is currently longer a nightmare…

    As for the algae I had already heard of it on radio 2 (Caterpillar) SCORA the summer. Eni was studying its possible use, But there were still limits of use because that type of algae would still contain an important sea area and one of the main limits would be the difficulty of limiting its reproduction risking that it becomes infesting and harmful to the surrounding sea ecosystem…

    Then we go we go with leaden feet before singing victory… However, it is just as it is true that in Italy there is very little about this and the information is far from free…
    This is the real problem of the near future, especially Italian…

    Ciao,
    Stafano.

    Reply

Leave a Reply