On cuts to public spending Napolitano adopts Palmerini's idea: the method is wrong. But it does not adopt the solution.
Napolitano acknowledged today that the indiscriminate cutting of Commons expenses, Provinces and Regions is a clear distortion.
circa 2 months ago I expressed the’ idea that the cuts as they are made by this government harms the virtuous and rewards dishonest.
It happens that those who have stolen and squandered to date, avendo in passato dichiarato un’alta spesa derivante appunto dagli sprechi, Today should only reduce those robberies of 10%, cioè semplicemente continuerà a rubare e a sprecare quasi come prima , resizing only slightly its practice.
All’opposto, municipalities, le Province e le Regioni virtuose che già prima sprecavano poco o nulla, also having to cut them 10% , They are having to cut essential services, and end up not being able to assist even the unemployed: This happens in the northern municipalities.
The cutting of the 10% è ben poco per una regione come la Sicilia che spende oltre 300 Euro all’anno per ogni cittadino, a small salary !
The cutting of the 10% è un disastro per Lombardia, Veneto and Emilia, that despite being the only 3 regioni attive contribuenti fiscali d’Italia, spendono all’anno per ogni cittadino SOLO 30 approximately EUR . The reader has read that right, the region taxpayers spend for their citizens 10 times less of Sicily, demonstrating that, As I say for years, la Sicilia è uno Stato Indipendente che consuma i beni degli altri. Caution: non è detto che i soldi arrivino direttamente in tasca ai siciliani, which would be a further motivation to not make them spend.
The data these, l’Italia di oggi è fatta in modo che chi più produce, get less . Where is the “meritocracy” ? Where justice?
The recipe Tremonti has distorting effects especially in Veneto, dove i comuni sono sempre stati attenti al risparmio e all’efficienza. sure, even here there is corruption and waste, but in a minimum percentage with respect to the Mafia regions.
Most Veneto municipalities is not asphalting the roads, not assistance to the unemployed, does not create sufficient housing, non può rinnovare gli arredi, He has no computers for schools, non può regolarizzare i dipendenti precari (and they are under organic), non può agire per la promozione del territorio, non può sviluppare la cultura e la socialità. Niente di tutto ciò in Trentino, south Tyrol, Friuli, Val d’Aosta.
Since the territories of the former Venetian Republic are among the top Italian taxpayers, to look at the data must be acknowledged that there is no question “North” but a Venetian question, of colonial exploitation.
With the recipe Tremonti, si è arrivati all’assurdo che i pochi comuni che hanno in cassa soldi derivanti da risparmi e ristrutturazioni fatte negli scorsi anni, non possono spendere i soldi perché altrimenti per sforamento verrebbero ulteriormente decurtati i finanziamenti.
For example, the municipality of Loreggia (PD) verrà perfino condannato per aver investito oculatamente i propri soldi , with which he has made an annual saving on heating, but getting the result with investments. Ora verrà punito per aver risparmiato.
La ricetta da adottare per risolvere il problema è molto semplice.
You MUST GIVE EACH REGION THE SAME MONEY FOR EACH INHABITANT
E’ a recipe entirely opposed to federalism, facendo così, there would certainly federalism, yet simple EQUALITY between Italian citizens.
Given that Sicily receives per capita 10 times what it receives the Veneto, il Veneto dovrebbe ricevere la metà dei soldi della Sicilia, ie the same money per citizen. By balancing with all regions, Veneto should receive at least three times the money.
Be advised that if you come to write THE SAME MONEY PER CAPITA TO EACH REGION , He would have had another great gift to regions like Sicily, la Campania perché il costo della vita lì è del 30-40% più basso.
Yet today, in particular the citizens of Venetie are depleted of their product, and despite being the major contributors RECEIVE VERY OF OTHER CITIZENS LESS
Dai dati economici risulta che Puglia e Sardegna ricevono dallo Stato più o meno quanto versano, non sono cioé parassiti. Anche loro riceverebbero di più dallo stato se si applicasse il criterio di uguaglianza e giustizia.
then , as there is no question NORTH, there is not a single issue of the South.
Instead, we can say that today there is racism among citizens DISCRIMINATION, based on ethnic differences, eventualemente a danno di quelli affacciati sull’Adriatico.
Of course the real parasites are autonomous regions (except Sardegna) che ricevono molto più di quanto danno. In Sardinia for little else escapes, as it escapes a lot in Sicily .
Io non sono contro l’autonomia, Rather, sono a favore dell’Autogoverno, But autonomy does not mean BE MAINTAINED, It means getting by without being a burden on the families of the other.
So we need to stop thinking in terms of NORTH AND SOUTH, but to highlight that there is discrimination against citizens of the virtuous regions and in behalf of those eddy regions, che sono più al Sud ma anche Liguria, Val d’Aosta ecc.
Anche l’evasione è in linea, chi paga di più in realtà evade meno. Chi riceve di più paga pure di più, anzi riceve perché risulta più povero della realtà evadendo. But who wants them to these brothers who parasitize on your work? Quale unità è questa ?
napolitano, from Campania or good companion, It does not ask for equality for all citizens, but only favors for a circle, and calls him “South” or Southern question. E’ una falsità numerica quella che esprime.
Faced with the numerical data to keep talking about, and SOUTH NORTH question serves only to keep up the cabin of the robbers in 2 Sicilie and if anything the Tyrrhenian coast
Le parole di Napolitano non creano unità, instead feed the North-South conflict wanted by the League, that certainly does not correspond to the Venetian interests, ma è funzionale a mantenere i privilegi sopratutto di Sicilia e Campania, as in other regions. And from this game lose out well Puglia, Basilicata, Marche and citizens of other regions, including immigrants.
Therefore Napolitano like the League, perché è di parte, It makes their interests, certo non rappresenta concretamente l’unità.
Let us remember well: if we give to all regions the same sum for each resident citizen, we would have made a HUGE gift to poor regions where costs are the 30% più bassi.
But today, with the excuse SOUTH, It is from Sicily 10 Sometimes what is taken for every citizen of the Veneto. Yes to Campani 5 volte quello che si da all’Emilia. E si lascia all’asciutto non solo le Venetie ma anche molte regioni del Sud.
According to the population and territory, Sicily should only receive the 30% in più rispetto al Veneto, not the 1000% as is the case today (non è un errore il MILLE per cento del Veneto) . And Sicily would still have a spending costs 40% più basso (cost of living).
Otherwise, cioè ad oggi, you DISCRIMINATION, perché i cittadini non ricevono gli stessi soldi.
equal money for all, the opposite of federalism, questa è la mia ricetta che ho espresso a Telenuovo.
Napolitano does not l’ adopts, favoreggiando penalizing the South and the North , ma è simpatico alla Lega.
My recipe, che sarebbe quella per salvare l’unità, non verrà mai attuata perché le Venetie sono una colonia.
It is clear and measured the Italian State Racism, just we have the legal divorce as we are doing.
Franco Zavala
22 September 2010 @ 17:09
A lavare la testa all’asino si perde solo tempo!!!
Quando imparerà o meglio studierà , the Two Sicilies, have an area ranging from Civitella Del Tronto (Abruzzo) Pantelleria (Sicily); Perhaps we could also engage in a serious and constructive discussion.
For the moment, può continuare tranquillamente a fare discorsi di fantapolitica becera dell’italietta, typical of the Po fottisterio!
Greetings,
Franco Zavala
then
23 September 2010 @ 02:30
As the Friuli and Veneto are not penalized in the same way, even Puglia , Basilicata and others do not have big advantages. Instead Campania and Sicily riceveno per inhabitant 10 Sometimes the money you receive per capita Veneto, Emilia and Lombardia, 340 Approximately EUR against 34 !
Moreover, I understand that the money given to the Sicily region to individual Sicilians do not come much, the services are disgusting and should “off the north” for treatment. Yet the money is sent, too many even.
Cut the money to Sicily region would only fine the Sicilians themselves, It would force them to chase the robbers to kick ass, while now they survive and steal. O dobbiamo mandare l’esercito sabaudo a fare la rivoluzione ? it is said (falsely) che si è fatta l’unità per salvare il sud oppresso. Show that you are not you asking that THERE ARE NO PRIVILEGES FOR.
If you have something to say that they are not only insults, see how the space is open.
Aribandus
19 September 2010 @ 12:37
Al dilà dell’abuso di certi termini come “racism”, mi sembra un’ottima idea. It would be very functional.
The issue becomes, however, determine that figure equal for all, that being all in a different condition, accontenterrebbe almost anyone and would in 99% cases discriminatory.
But if you were to choose it at all costs? It would be advisable not to demoralize the virtuous, so the figure would be as high as possible, and not wasteful, and would force the thieves to do well.
Then no, it is better to federalism. fiscal.
Loris Palmerini
23 September 2010 @ 02:27
If they would give all regions the same money per capita that are given today to the spendthrift regions, to multiply 10 public spending, e semplicemente manderebbe in bancarotta l’italia in 1 month. So you do not say anything sensible.
What is needed to make the current spending media and give that to all.
Result ? Many more money to the virtuous regions (Emilia Romagna, Veneto, Lombardy), which means EQUALITY, and cut funds to those wasteful, which means LESS WASTE AND FRAUDS.