THE “people Venetian” it is no longer just an idea, there is a definition

THE “people Venetian” now it is no longer a meaningless idea, there is a definition

The profound legal revolution will only be understood over time, semantics and politics than the PDL 116/2016 (Now L.r.Veneto 28/2016) has begun and will come about.

There are already many who are jumping on the bandwagon, and our problem is, if anything, that of curbing the assault on the diligence.

In fact, even those who have opposed and hindered the PDL 116 Now they want the fruits and try to obtain personal benefits. Sure it sucks, but it is only the demonstration that the Italian mentality of changing shirt when necessary is also present in the political upstarts of the Veneto world as I have always said, and that some are wolves in sheep. Just look at their acts to understand. The paradox is that these politicians are actually trying to save themselves destroying his own reputation, but on the other hand, credibility and consistency are not important for them, but save yourself from oblivion.

What you can already see is that, beyond the fate of individuals, there is a before and after the PDL 116 , today Venetian Regional Law No. 29/2016.

For example, up to before the 13 DECEMBER 2016 (date of publication of the law n° 28) there was no legal definition of “people Venetian”. And this is one of the revolutionary aspects of the law, although not even the most impactful.

It seems incredible, but until the 13 December it could say that the Venetian people was made by the only resident of the region, not even bothering to talk about identity, tongue, History. Who cares ? Does it matter to a possible referendum on the fate of the Venetian people according to these politicians had the right to vote with the Venetians (and the Venetian!) even the economic immigrant who arrived by boat the day before.

or c’ it was who defined veneti “anyone” he wanted, as Albert Gardin, which betrays and denies identity to the Venetian people themselves and is even contrary to the tradition of the Venetian Republic.

Some other politicians instead are delighted to say that the Venetian people was formed by residents in the Veneto region, including naturalized immigrants, Italian Southern Italy, citizens legally resident in Europe. unbelievable ? No no, do local mind and come to understand yourself who you are.

There are those who have even organized a virtual vote simply by fishing from telephone directories !

Among these geniuses of the definition there were also well-known politicians and jurists who are now silent.

All this did nothing but confuse the Venetians, which they were led astray in their historical consciousness, I would say that were plagiarized.

And the situation was certainly useful to be able beautifully to deny the human rights of the Veneto. Indeed, given that everyone used to say that he felt comfortable, Even the Supreme Court in 2011 he has declared (but not sentenced) that “people Venetian” it meant nothing but residents without any specialty ( vedi http://www.palmerini.net/blog/sentenza-popolo-veneto-solo-residenti-senza-sovranita-autogoverno-solo-elezioni-amministrative/ ) which he already demonstrated then “forced assimilation” to which the Venetians were submitted in violation of international law.

The European Commission also in 2014 It said that there is no Venetian population worthy of protection, because it is not legally recognized and because the matter does not fall within their competence. Too bad that the competence is written in Article 6 of the Treaty on the EU !

there is a before and after the PDL 116. The facts narrated throw in discrediting many self-proclaimed “jurists” and political, but on the other we know that those definitions pulled from one side or the other were simply the racist attempt to deny human rights to the Venetians.

Today we are in the post, and today we can say on the basis of the law is no legal definition of who is part of the “people Venetian”, or better, actually of the national minority. In fact, the law now “those communities historically and culturally or linguistically linked to the Venetian people, even outside the regional territory, are also part of the Venetian national minority.” (art.1 comma 2 the L.r.Veneto 28/2016)

It is no coincidence that this definition is very similar to that of the Venetian people that I have always proposed since 1999, not only because I am the author of the bill, but because it is the only definition that makes sense enough that yes “attagli” to reality, in short, which correctly describes and respects the historical identity of the Venetian people in terms of national minority. And it is an international legal right of the minority to be defined in respect of its own identity.

It was discussed in the Regional Council as if it were a law “regional” to give a regional ultra definition of national minority. Who has apparently asked knows no international law, speaking without borders or only when the boundaries are the subject of the speech.

If on the one hand it is true that the regional law is valid only in the regional territory, from the other hand the concept of “national minority” it is instead a concept of international law, and the law expressly provides that national minorities can be ultra-ultra-regional and even national (or better say “transnational” if this would not be an absurd because it is stateless nations).

In other words, even if you had not written a definition of “national minority” , international law the supplied indirectly, but it was better to write it to avoid confusion for do-it-yourself jurists who have made a lot of it in the last two decades.

But what kind of international rights have been recognized at the Venetian then ? With legal recognition that the Venetian people's rights are “national minority” and with the definition of a national minority, as has been done, the rights provided for by the Venetians were recognized “Framework Convention on National Minorities”. Point, and it is false, as claimed Mocellin, which is called the Venetian people as a national minority. In fact, the people of Veneto were by no means limited to being a minority, why his “capacity” legal elsewhere traceable, such as the right of self-determination, they have not been touched or impaired or otherwise defined.

The Venetian people had only the recognition of a status, of a capacity, that before he was denied by fraud.

To make you understand what I mean I have done this example several times, and it seems to get the idea right.

Suppose to be the owners of an entire five-storey apartment building, unfortunately totally occupied. With agreements with the occupants and with a legal ruling, however, it is possible to obtain the right to use the first two floors. This does not mean that ownership of the other three floors has been lost, nor that in fact one actually enjoys the first two floors whose right has been recognized. Only if the first had no recognized rights, but now we have the rights recognized and expected are still complied, and if they are still denied we have a stronger system like “eviction” to be protected.

here it is, actually with the PDL 116 They were obtained four floors on the five, but this will also depend on the good will of the Italian State and also of the Venetians themselves, they must learn to marginalize scammers.

With the PDL 116, how it came out, and despite being released maimed and damaged by the fifth column of false Venetian, the Venetians today have something big and important, including the recognition in the definition of “national minority” of their history and inter-state identity.

To understand the magnitude yet, if tomorrow a common Veneto passed to Trentino, this would still remain a municipality that can be part of the National Minority Self-Government Region, as also a slice of Trentino today. In other words, Rome can remove the government of the territory from Venice, but it can no longer cancel the identity and the right to remain united as a national minority territory and this by international law which prevails over regional law, the state and also on that of the EU.

In fact they may be part of the unique region “veneta” “those communities historically and culturally or linguistically linked to the Venetian people even outside the regional territory.”, and it is an international right that no one will ever be able to cancel, because prohibited by the Framework Convention on national minorities from the Council of Europe.

Now the Venetian people and the Veneto Regional Council have very powerful legal means to protect their right to exist as a culture, tongue, and the right to self-government, the right to see all Venetian united under a single administrative region.

OPPS, This I had not yet told ? Little , It was written in the Framework Convention on Minorities, “Ignorance of the law is no excuse”.

The region can legally, if he knows how to take action with the right advisers, to become a dominant real in his own kingdom, for the interest of the Venetians, residents, of the upper Adriatic region and of Italy, forced to come clean and stop with the Mafia.

And the region will have to do it, because we Venetians will never give up: it's just a matter of time.

There was a first fact of confusion. Now the Venetians may know who they are, for those who don't study our history there is even a law that says so.