Science: Most vaccines favor the disease they would like to fight

The research of the 2003 titled “Imperfect vaccination: some epidemiological and evolutionary consequences” di Sylvain Gandon, Margaret Mackinnon, Sean Nee and Andrew Read proved it, that mass vaccination policies are mostly and to be abolished completely, a fact that has also been shown by other research.

Indeed “One of the objectives d”One of the goals of some vaccination programs is to reduce the prevalence of an infectious disease as well, Finally, eradicate it. We show that the success of eradication depends on the type of vaccine and vaccination coverage. Vaccines that reduce the growth rate of the parasite within the host select a greater virulence of the parasite and this evolution can be increase the prevalence of the disease than prevent the eradication of the disease.

Unlike, vaccines that reduce the likelihood of infection they select against virulence [of the parasite] and can more easily lead to eradication. in some cases, the epidemiological feedback on the evolution of the parasite produces an ambivalent evolutionary situation for which, in the intermediate vaccination coverage the parasites can evolve towards high or low virulence, depending on the initial conditions. These findings have practical implications for the design and use of imperfect vaccines in public and animal health programs.”i some vaccination programs are reducing the prevalence of an infectious disease as well, Finally, eradicate it. We show that the success of eradication depends on the type of vaccine and vaccination coverage. Vaccines that reduce the growth rate of the parasite within the host select a greater virulence of the parasite and this evolution can be increase the prevalence of the disease than prevent the eradication of the disease.

Unlike, vaccines that reduce the likelihood of infection they select against virulence [of the parasite] and can more easily lead to eradication. in some cases, the epidemiological feedback on the evolution of the parasite produces an ambivalent evolutionary situation for which, in the intermediate vaccination coverage the parasites can evolve towards high or low virulence, depending on the initial conditions. These findings have practical implications for the design and use of imperfect vaccines in public and animal health programs.”

In other words, vaccines that do not prevent transmission are to be avoided because they select even more harmful variants.

What are these vaccines? All those whose package leaflets say that vaccination should be followed by a quarantine period or that in any case does not prevent the disease from being transmitted. Certainly it is the measles vaccines, whooping cough, Rubella, Influenza, Pneumonia, and many others,

But also those against Covid-19, it is they who are creating the variants.

What science tells us is clear: the more you vaccinate with imperfect vaccines, the more the diseases grow stronger and spread, in a vicious circle that leads to the impossibility of eradicating the disease.

So we have to fight for the immediate suspension of these imperfect vaccines.

E’ It is clear that those responsible for public health act against science and in violation of the citizens' right to health, and certainly this benefits the vaccine manufacturers who will eternally be able to sell the products that are actually responsible for new and worse variants of the disease they claim to be fighting..

Loris Palmerini – all rights reserved