Dr.. Montanari disputes (in the method) analyzes of the vaccines made by Corvelva

Loris Palmerini – All rights reserved

THE Dr.. Montanari, ( I had called the professor consistent Treccani as very learned person, and moreover he carries out an incessant activity of public scientific dissemination, but he did not like ) interviewed by Radio Range 5, It contested the analysis of the vaccines made by Corvelva, not result in, but in the method. I have no evidence he did before .

It is not up to me to say where scientific truth lies, But it is appropriate to understand the question.

I first reported his words and then checked by listening to the interview. Montanari has shown that when you do an analysis, to have certainty of outcome, The exams must be repeated over and over again. According Montanari this procedure and other measures were not complied with by Corvelva, and in particular contested the small number of vaccines used and the low number of analyzes. For Montanari number of vaccines (quattro) analyzed by Corvelva is small, And the number of samples is insufficient. He reported that their lab has analyzed 35 for hundreds of samples vaccines. He did not talked (as I reported earlier), the fact that they have been analyzed by different laboratories.

The professor did not contest the results in itself, He said that more and more results are similar from different sources, but for the following method, the figure is not conclusive at 100% , There is a scientific dispute on the reliability of the results also for the international community .

Not being a biologist Montanari did not enter the results itself, It was a method of speech. Montanari, basically I wanted to comment on what I just reported, further confirming , http://www.stefanomontanari.net/il-professore-che-contesta/

I can not name names, but I must say that considerations of the same standard of I Montanari were made in private by a prominent lawyer, who claimed to have learned of these critical issues from his important knowledge in the CNR . This lawyer stressed that the critical elements of the Corvelva investigation method do not imply that the results of the analyzes are not correct, but that, unfortunately, the results could be considered to be unreliable by an eventual magistrate, Especially since a magistrate could not help but contact an expert in the sector who could not help but declare them insufficiently probing for a criminal complaint.

However, remember that the analyzes made by Corvelva should do the state as indicated by the Uranium Commission, And it is certainly very serious that Corvelva is alternating with its own funds and therefore insufficiently.

Unfortunately it seems that the state will not hear and does not protect public health, So the real reason for vaccines is simply a general savings of public spending downloaded to the families of damaged children. It therefore seems that you will have to continue with the analyzes “private” refining the method by new research.

Unfortunately, the evidence is that our victory will not come easily from science alone (which is also totally with us) nor from the criminal persecution (simply formulation would change and would resume), although we also epidemiological statistics that give us reason.

I insist in saying that our victory will arrive instead based on the principles, and it will consist in affirming force that the state not entitled to impose vaccinations because this is prohibited by Oviedo Convention, And for this we have therefore already won how I go saying since October 2017, but actually we win when we succeed in imposing the state respect for these our human rights . We can do it with a unified and strong action if we do not disperse into shares probably not productive or otherwise trench.

A victorious action is the one started in December 2017 when we sent to the President of the Republic a request that obliges him to deposit with the Council of Europe the ratification of the Oviedo Convention made with law no. 145/2001. We re-presented it again in June 2018 (via PEC) and March 1 2019 we sent a reminder that triggers the past 30 days.

In my opinion, it is no coincidence that after the reminder there was the turn of the minister Grillo who has become contrary to the compulsory obligation, and the same DDL 770 has changed drastically in the opposite direction to the obligation. Why since in the government contract there is the obligation?

It seems then that miraculously all covers have been reached, that there are no more tens of thousands of unvaccinated children (instead there are still) and that therefore it is possible to substantially exit the emergency. They are all masks of the truth to hide the fact that the Lorenzin law is completely unconstitutional and for its pervasiveness and gravity it is subversive.

Through this legal action we can not only regain our rights, but proceed with their possible arrest against the Constitution, And if we are in tens of thousands it will certainly not be a buffered. We are on the side of the law and they are illegal for the law.

For this reason, it is essential to sign the application to the President who obliges him to deposit the ratification of the Convention made with law n.145/2001 at the Council of Europe, It is the same law that established it. The Oviedo Convention has already been in force in reality since 1999, The law itself n ° 145/2001 recognized it. THERE IS NO OBLIGATION VACCINATION, only a blackmail abuse for children in state or state-owned infant-toddler centers and preschools. Get acquainted with your rights, sign the application and do not believe the television lies, well those are subversive of your rights.

https://www.palmerini.net/istanza

Loris Palmerini – All rights reserved