Tell PEC with this letter to the ASL and then inform the school that he had asked an appointment for vaccination compelled by law Lorenzin well as being the law unconstitutional and compression of our human rights, and appealed to the Constitutional Court.
The law n. 119 of the 2017, from here on out “Lorenzin”, It is clearly unconstitutional because it denies rights of the human being such as those sanctioned by the Oviedo Convention which entered into force on 1 December 1999 and ratified as a law of the state from Italy.
In fact, the Oviedo Convention being ratified international law on human rights and health takes precedence over any law of the Italian State within the meaning of article 10, 2 E 32 Cost.
Lorenzin, on the other hand, illegally declares compulsory vaccinations by violating the right of the human being, and in the absence of pediatric epidemics of any kind, with the declared aim of achieving levels of coverage not required by international health organizations and unrelated medical and scientific reasonableness.
Lorenzin is the attention of the Constitutional Court for these and other very serious violations of the Constitution and Human Rights.
In addition to the violation of human rights viola Lorenzin the Constitution in the distribution of powers between the State and the Region, then regulates health with administrative terms in the sphere of health protection that the Constitution reserves to the Region.
For the time being Lorenzin patently unconstitutional, He asks every citizen of not respecting this rule illegal, Especially since produced on the basis of an emergency that both the government and the WHO do not recognize existing.
This is also denounced that on a medical level the law is dangerous for health since the population is forced to receive the vaccines of “Medicines subject to additional monitoring” that is not demonstrably safe and even potentially dangerous as written in their leaflets. Say that they are sure in the presence of the contraindications of the same who affirm the opposite is a false ideological and medical. On the other hand, it is scientifically demonstrated and we will prove to our meeting, that some of the ingredients of some or all vaccines, like aluminum in different formulation, but not exclusively, They are scientifically associated with serious diseases, and calls for scientific expertise in order to assess the need’ their withdrawal from the market. This therefore applies as a complaint of pericosity of the vaccination drugs ascertainable by the Bugiardini themselves and the official medical science.
As required by Lorenzin we are forced to seek vaccination appointment of the Child _________________, But we communicate that we are forced to do it in order not to suffer a further and serious damage of human rights of the child but we say that pursuant to art.5 of the Oviedo Convention we do not give any consent for vaccination at the moment.
For these reasons, We ask for an appointment in order to ascertain the constituted danger of the same in relation to our child, And for the occasion we will provide detailed medical studies that will force the health unit to medical and economic liability against vaccinated.
Adelmo
20 October 2017 @ 10:35
Salve.
And once you arrive at the appointment, what documentation you can take to support their thesis?
How to deal? What to ask? What to expect?
Which pre-vaccinal exams must be requested from the attending physician and/or ASL?
Which of these can be done for free, and which at its own expense?
Thank you
loris
29 October 2017 @ 10:38
I wrote in Family Kit