Income of citizenship or residency income?

There has always been a great confusion on the concept of "citizen".

To keep it simple, "Being citizen" of a state, or "having citizenship" means that the law recognizes you a series of rights but also of duties respects that state. A few examples.

If you are a citizen of a State generally have the right to vote in that State, but also to be elected. Of course you can vote for your city of residence, for your region or (or "state" or "lander" depending on how the organization is) and the Parliament or the Chambers. Applications in all these bodies are governed by specific laws each. You have the right to vote for the referendum. But citizenship means much more than this.

As a citizen of a state, there is normally entitled to various social services such as education, Healthcare, Some economists and social rights, but if they are paid or not depends on state laws. For example, in some states health care is not guaranteed except at a very basic level, and the rest I'll have to pay at your expense or through insurance.
Generally you have the right, according to the laws to a series of aid if you are in difficulty, as in the case of temporary unemployment, invalidity etc.. These services are possible if there are resources, and these are the result of past generations who have built your wellbeing working hard. If resources are squandered on electoral bonus, corruption, inefficiency etc., it goes without saying that before or after the services they will be damaged.

The legal rights of citizenship follow you even if you are abroad, and if for example you steal documents, You are entitled to go to the Embassy of your state to make you issue an identity document.

All this according to the theory, because then it happens that the same services that are recognized to citizens, some states also recognize them to non-citizens who are in their territory. This is the case of the Italian state that in Italy recognizes essential health care to anyone. However, he does not recognize this right to Italian citizens permanently residing abroad that they are temporarily in Italy! On health, the Italian state discriminates Italian citizens also in any other way, And it came to the point of making health tickets pay only to its citizens by giving the hospital services for free to 100% non-citizens in its territory. It is a folly of discrimination against citizens and in favor of non-citizens. For what purpose ? To encourage immigration of course !

And why a state should favor immigration ? For example, to steal other States of the cheap labor ready to work, without having to spend anything prior to their birth and growth and training. A graduate costs the Italian community about 500.000 Euros to be formed. Since then the Italian graduates leave well as where to pay them decently, Italy has adopted a logic of "industrial management" of the population, importing doctors, assistants etc., already beautiful that ready. And at the same time weaken more and more universities, Rather, It is being proposed as well to remove the legal value of the degrees!

To encourage the flight of young people trained and ready to work from home countries obviously poorer countries, But this damage made to them is nothing compared to colonialism that the Italian state has practiced during its short existence. The Republic of Venice has not practiced my colonialism in 1100 years of existence, Unlike, It favored the development of all the territories that came into collaboration or subjection to it. It is therefore possible !

We return to the confusion between citizen and resident. In theory the citizen should have more rights than the non -citizen, But now it is like this for a few things and the matter has become complicated starting from the birth of the old European community and even more with the European Union.

The idea of ​​"European citizenship" was initially to allow the mobility and residence everywhere of the citizens of the States in the various adhering states, that every national of a Member State, since November 1 1993, can reside in any other state of the European Union, and without a residence permit. That citizens Tedeschi, Spagnoli, Italian etc. are entitled since then to reside wherever they want in the European Union, and in the place of residence chosen they are entitled to have the same working and social conditions of the citizens of the state. Not only, They may also vote and be elected in local government. Following these rights were extended to other citizens of the new states like Romania, Poland, Croatia etc. etc.. This already has tangible effects. some municipalities, as Padua, they have already had the election of mayors who have won thanks to the lobbies of the voters of another state, Specifically the Romanians have counted in the election of Zanonato. in 2019 The former French president will apply for mayor of Barcelona.

However, The rights of "European citizenship" have become independent with the birth in 2009 the European Union, since legal independence has been given to her, that is, it has become a second citizenship independent of the first. The rights of the European citizen from the rights of the citizen of a Member State have thus released themselves. In the United Kingdom they are discussing on the topic, Precisely because with Brexit EU citizens will return to being without social and residence rights and everything will change from them returning to the pure citizenship of the state (but remember that the UK is part of the Commonwealth, which also recognizes rights to other citizens of other States).

In the EU there are few differences between the rights of different people from different Member EU, In practice, the difference is compared to which "national" parliament votes. As mentioned, a non -Italian EU citizen but resident in Italy can only vote for the municipalities, while the Italian citizen (and not simply living) it can also vote for regional administrations and for Parliament, as well as for a referendum. Yet, if an Italian living in Germany, can apply and vote in the city of residence (for example in Berlin) but cannot apply for the German parliament, nor will vote for Parliament, for the Land and even in referendums.

Hence, for example,, Making a referendum where all residents vote is a violation of citizenship rights, But that's what they absurdly proposed certain movements for the independence of Veneto.

Now that the concept of "citizenship" is clearer, Let's see that of nationality. as mentioned, If one is an Italian citizen, is legally Italian. And if one is non -EU citizens, It is not legally Italian, But it is certainly not even German, Spanish etc., ie an EU country.

As said, a person can have different citizenships at the same time, for example, Italian and EU, or US and Israel, or Brazilian and EU.

So do not believe even those who propose to renounce their citizenship, because it is not a good idea because it simply renounces only rights, But moreover at least one citizenship must necessarily have it since the state of apolide (without citizenship) It is prohibited by international law.

Since a person can have more citizenships, It is evident that his nationality corresponds to the citizenship he demonstrates with the passport. On the other hand there are also multi -ethnic states in which nationality (different from citizenship) is recognized. Nationality not only does not correspond to citizenship, But it is something that has more to do with its ethnic and cultural origin or even blood in certain cases increasingly rare. For example, one can be Croatian but of Italian nationality because it belongs to the Italian national minority present especially in Istria, which are actually ethnically Venetian. There are about twenty -five millions of people of Venetian nationality scattered through the way they are divided into dozens of different citizenships depending on their residence, citizenships that prevent them from even the mere residence in the homeland, the Venezie, for example there are about 3 Venetians million descendants in South America , speaking Veneto, to which the return with administrative tricks by the Italian State is prevented that made them run away after the invasion of 1866.

In the same way a Scottish of United Kingdom is British citizen but of Scottish nationality.

Let's go back to the title. Citizenship income to those who will be given ?

As far as we know, it will also be given to non -citizens both non -EU and EU, as long as they have been residing for at least ten years. At least that's what you know today.

Therefore it is erroneous to call it "citizenship income" and it should be called instead "residence income", Unless with the word "citizenship" we want to understand not the legal status of being citizens, but the mere participation in civic life, therefore "citizenship" as the action of living and citizenship income as income for participation.

In short, there is a terminological confusion, that actually makes a nice gift of citizenship for non-citizens to the detriment of citizens of Italian citizens. Especially if then from the cylinder a beautiful amnesty will come out for the irregular ones with the excuse of making them emerge retroactively also.

For more, Based on the "declared income", The "citizenship income" will be perceived almost entirely by the poor and homeless residents, for which illegal immigrants PD, and they will struggle to even perceive the citizens of the South.

On this terminological confusion between citizenship, residence and nationality have been practiced by immigration policies that have in fact already erased Italianness previously indefinable quite indefinable.

In fact, in recent years the Italian citizens like pigs to make salami are treated, dispossessing them of their rights, expropriating them with their collective and state properties accumulated by generations of workers, and dispossessing them of their personal property as well with different taxes.

A farlo è stato lo stesso Stato Italiano che in realtà è nato dalla spoliazione degli Stati preunitari, illegally invaded by mercenary armies financed by international occult powers. the trials ?

Just wondering how it was possible that (perhaps) thousand gawkers on three battered boats have earned an island manned by 24.000 well-armed soldiers. Ovvio che parlo dello “sbarco” in Sicilia di Garibaldi.

Se dunque è questa la storia di sempre, perché da sempre gli “Italiani” (governed by the Piedmont-Sardinia) They were managed as if they were chickens or pigs in breeding, tanto vale non stupirsi più della inutilità della stessa identità e cittadinanza italiana. Non serve più essere italiani, Rather, è una sfiga se paragonata alle altre cittadinanze ed agli altri Stati della UE.

Whether it's time to do the math on your own well-being and find a solution ?