On cuts to public spending Napolitano adopts Palmerini's idea: the method is wrong. But it does not adopt the solution.

Napolitano acknowledged today that the indiscriminate cutting of Commons expenses, Provinces and Regions is a clear distortion.

circa 2 months ago I expressed the’ idea that the cuts as they are made by this government harms the virtuous and rewards dishonest.

It happens that those who have stolen and squandered to date, having declared a high expenditure in the past deriving from waste, Today should only reduce those robberies of 10%, that is, it will simply continue to steal and waste almost as before , resizing only slightly its practice.

Opposite, municipalities, the provinces and virtuous regions that already wasted little or nothing before, also having to cut them 10% , They are having to cut essential services, and end up not being able to assist even the unemployed: This happens in the northern municipalities.

The cutting of the 10% It is very little for a region like Sicily that spends beyond 300 Euros per year for every citizen, a small salary !

The cutting of the 10% It is a disaster for Lombardy, Veneto and Emilia, that despite being the only 3 Regions active tax taxpayers of Italy, they spend a year for every citizen only 30 approximately EUR . The reader has read that right, the region taxpayers spend for their citizens 10 times less of Sicily, demonstrating that, As I say for years, Sicily is an independent state that consumes the goods of others. Caution: It is not said that the money arrives directly in the pocket of the Sicilians, which would be a further motivation to not make them spend.

The data these, Today's Italy is made so that those who produce most, get less . Where is the “meritocracy” ? Where justice?

The recipe Tremonti has distorting effects especially in Veneto, where the municipalities have always been attentive to savings and efficiency. sure, even here there is corruption and waste, but in a minimum percentage with respect to the Mafia regions.

Most Veneto municipalities is not asphalting the roads, not assistance to the unemployed, does not create sufficient housing, cannot renew the furnishings, He has no computers for schools, cannot regularize precarious employees (and they are under organic), cannot act for the promotion of the territory, It cannot develop culture and sociality. None of this in Trentino, south Tyrol, Friuli, Aosta Valley.

Since the territories of the former Venetian Republic are among the top Italian taxpayers, to look at the data must be acknowledged that there is no question “North” but a Venetian question, of colonial exploitation.

With the recipe Tremonti, It has come to the absurd that the few municipalities that have money deriving from savings and renovations made in recent years, they cannot spend the money because otherwise the funding would be further reduced by the breakdown.

For example, the municipality of Loreggia (PD) he will even be sentenced for having carefully invested his money , with which he has made an annual saving on heating, but getting the result with investments. Now he will be punished for saving.

The recipe to be adopted to solve the problem is very simple.

You MUST GIVE EACH REGION THE SAME MONEY FOR EACH INHABITANT

E’ a recipe entirely opposed to federalism, doing so, there would certainly federalism, yet simple EQUALITY between Italian citizens.

Given that Sicily receives per capita 10 times what it receives the Veneto, Veneto should receive half of the money of Sicily, ie the same money per citizen. By balancing with all regions, Veneto should receive at least three times the money.

Be advised that if you come to write THE SAME MONEY PER CAPITA TO EACH REGION , He would have had another great gift to regions like Sicily, Campania because the cost of living is of the 30-40% lower.

Yet today, in particular the citizens of Venetie are depleted of their product, and despite being the major contributors RECEIVE VERY OF OTHER CITIZENS LESS

Economic data appears that Puglia and Sardinia receive more or less from the state how much they pay, they are not parasites. They too would receive more from the state if the criterion of equality and justice applied.

then , as there is no question NORTH, there is not a single issue of the South.

Instead, we can say that today there is racism among citizens DISCRIMINATION, based on ethnic differences, possible to the detriment of those overlooking the Adriatic.

Of course the real parasites are autonomous regions (except Sardegna) that receive much more than they give. In Sardinia for little else escapes, as it escapes a lot in Sicily .

I am not against autonomy, Rather, I am in favor of self -government, But autonomy does not mean BE MAINTAINED, It means getting by without being a burden on the families of the other.

So we need to stop thinking in terms of NORTH AND SOUTH, but to highlight that there is discrimination against citizens of the virtuous regions and in behalf of those eddy regions, who are more south but also Liguria, Val d’Aosta etc..

The escape is also in line, Those who pay more actually evades less. Those who receive more pay more, indeed it receives why it is poorer than reality by evading. But who wants them to these brothers who parasitize on your work? Which unit is this ?

napolitano, from Campania or good companion, It does not ask for equality for all citizens, but only favors for a circle, and calls him “South” or Southern question. E’ a numerical falsehood that expresses.

Faced with the numerical data to keep talking about, and SOUTH NORTH question serves only to keep up the cabin of the robbers in 2 Sicilie and if anything the Tyrrhenian coast
The words of Napolitano do not create unity, instead feed the North-South conflict wanted by the League, that certainly does not correspond to the Venetian interests, But it is functional to maintain the privileges especially of Sicily and Campania, as in other regions. And from this game lose out well Puglia, Basilicata, Marche and citizens of other regions, including immigrants.

Therefore Napolitano like the League, because it is biased, It makes their interests, certainly does not actually represent the unit.

Let us remember well: if we give to all regions the same sum for each resident citizen, we would have made a HUGE gift to poor regions where costs are the 30% lower.

But today, with the excuse SOUTH, It is from Sicily 10 Sometimes what is taken for every citizen of the Veneto. Yes to Campani 5 sometimes what is given to Eritia. And not only the Venetias are left to dry but also many regions of the South.

According to the population and territory, Sicily should only receive the 30% In addition to Veneto, not the 1000% as is the case today (The thousand percent of Veneto is not a mistake) . And Sicily would still have a spending costs 40% lower (cost of living).

Otherwise, that is to today, you DISCRIMINATION, because citizens do not receive the same money.

equal money for all, the opposite of federalism, This is my recipe that I expressed in Telenuovo.

Napolitano does not l’ adopts, favoreggiando penalizing the South and the North , but he is nice to the League.

My recipe, which would be the one to save the unit, It will never be implemented because the Venetias are a colony.

It is clear and measured the Italian State Racism, just we have the legal divorce as we are doing.