For vaccines forced Emma Bonino and its movement disavow the right to abortion

In the site “More Europe”, movement headed by Emma Bonino, in data 15 February appeared a comment concerning the application in their lists of certain Tutino.

We read that “Tutino raises the issue of the human right not to vaccinate "one's" children”,: it is a position to be opposed without any reservations, firstly because children are not "parents" and do not belong to them like a limb or an internal organ (on which freedom of treatment can apply in principle)”

Given that the protection of the “human right” E, today, the only founding pillar that differentiates Europe from other continents, and we often do boast of interventions “Democrats” for safekeeping, even with the use of weapons if necessary. And it seems paradoxical to me to have to explain it to those who have officially dealt with it, like Bonino, evidently without understanding the nature of the assignment.

Given that the right to “informed consent” in each “act” in the field of medicine it is a human right legally protected by Oviedo Convention, which is also law in Italy as well as throughout the Council of Europe, the position of denial of this human right places the movement and Bonino in a position contrary to intangible rights, then an illegal position, but also to our European values, Ossi antieuropeista. However, the President of the Republic no longer cares that it is illegal.

But ideologically it is a total repudiation of the Bonino career from the beginning. In fact, once said ‘that children are not "parents"‘ and they do not belong to them as a limb or an internal organ’ here is that automatically abortion should be banned, Why already in the third week of life the fetus has its own neuronal activity, and therefore exists as to be, although not yet fully autonomous, but no longer a simple one “organ” the pregnant woman, then individual on whom, to the same ethical reasons why Bonino imposes vaccines as questionable, the pregnant woman would no longer have the right to choose her existence.

Yet Bonino uprooted these fetuses “no more limb” without hesitation even the law, and in this sense, according to his current positions, it deprived these defenseless individuals of the right to life while still in the womb but no longer an internal organ, practicing, in this logic, murders, and in this case the law does not care about anyone.

Therefore, if for the current position in Bonino the good of the children and their lives must exist beyond the will of the parents, position which to a certain extent is legitimate but not so extreme, and even says that when necessary, also in violation of human rights, It should prohibit individual choice, for example not to vaccinate, then there are the other consequences.

However, I highlight that this position is that of the vaccine business and the philosophy of death that guides it, because we find aluminum in doses in vaccines 200 times the maximum tolerable for a child, essentially incompatible with the normal functions that get injected in part to the brain, and which it is injected together with other substances biologically intolerable, and all together contribute to make our society a dying one, now suffering from cancer and autoimmune diseases as they were not before the era of vaccinations, E deaths statistically detected precisely in the vicinity of the injections (SIDS), not to mention the long-term diseases such as learning deficit, and SLA, le fibromyalgia etc. All things scientifically proven. E’ also skipped the precautionary principle, and also that science, as well as the law, no one cares anymore.

In short, we are experiencing a phase of scientific and ethical obscurantism not even controlled by a religious authority, that as this is not desirable, at least constitutes a preferable way to an evil chaos.

If the social good is to prevail over the individual, even to his detriment and against his will, as claimed by the movement of the Bonino for vaccinations (because vaccine-damaged people exist), here it is for the good of the unborn child and of society as well, especially when we are dying like ours, abortion must be prohibited beyond the time when ithe fetus exists with its own “thought”, neuronal activity, that is, from the third week.

For more, with all due respect to those self-righteous to death, this concept of collective good overriding individual good is expressly prohibited:

Article 2 – Primacy of the human being : The interest and the good of the human being must prevail over the sole interest of society or science. – Oviedo Convention

It can be deduced that the movement “More Europe” should change name “fewer European freedoms and more deaths” because we cannot want the right to abortion and mandatory vaccination at the same time without revealing a philosophy for death and contrary to certain fundamental freedoms.

Even for the phrase “the right not to vaccinate is equivalent to the right to study or do not allow children to play: a choice that deprives them of something extremely useful without making them absolutely nothing“, the movement of the Bonino should be true to himself, and say that then the children should be taken away from those families that do not guarantee a correct way of life defined by the state, Gypsies as non-migratory. And then it should propose invasions of countries where children are not made to study but even forces them to emigrate, and not accept the immigration as vent valves…..

But if you go down this road, here we must also ban euthanasia because it is not a good of society that we take away from ourselves that value to be safeguarded which is life, and then you should prohibit the refusal of chemotherapy and the right to assisted death, but to safeguard life “in power” It should also prohibit even contraceptives. All the positions contrary to life so far embodied by Bonino and which began with the first home scalpels in the uterus of some poor woman, they are at odds with the position for compulsory vaccination which is contrary to individual freedom, actually to human rights.

If you want to be consistent with those of forced vaccinations positions, Bonino should also finally say clearly that everything in individual behavior does not conform to what is established by the State, for some specific issues it legitimizes the State to intervene violently and deny individual freedom, also to the abduction of children and forced vaccination as already happens for example in Poland.

E’ clearly a common position to Fascism and Communism and anti-libertarian, Pannella for sure is turning in his grave.

I, however, say that this ideological position is to be opposed without any reservations, Also with an exclusion from democracy, with the exclusion of the party from the elections, because it is an illiberal and anti-democratic position, as well as contrary to human rights, then against the Constitution. We must be as liberators with Nazism and Fascism, in this case with the beam-Communism of chemical control.

The irony of all this is that many of the Radicals' battles were battles driven by international human rights law, that is, battles that simply accompanied an inevitable change because it was induced by international legislation on human rights. An example is divorce, which it was not introduced in Italy thanks to a referendum which collaborated Radicals, the referendum simply consecrated what was due under international law anyway. In fact, divorce was first imposed as a right by article 23 paragraph 4 of the “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” issued by the UN in 1966. That time the Radicals only did the job of making him accept it as it would have happened before or after according to Article 10 of the Constitution.

However, it is a pity that from implementing human rights, Bonino is now in an evidently illiberal position and contrary to human rights themselves. Evidently, human rights were not the bar that has guided the lives of Bonino, so luckily she did not become President of the Republic. Let's hope that at least Pannella wasn't actually guided by anything else.

Emma Bonino has perhaps finally expressed his entire position of violence than the other's body, a position guided by and actually serving only economic interests which are often enemies of the family and love for children, and therefore I am in favor of abortion, of divorce, of euthanasia and immigration, against religions, freedom of choice in terms of health and probably in favor of the destruction of everything that is not useful to the global market. Surely there is someone willing to pay to have this work done.

But be careful, Emma, Although these positions are understandable in one who has not experienced the joy of life to be born, or to those who have not had the strength to love a family even when they did, these inconsistencies are bad for your health, the brain orders the consistency of thought, and when this is reached stubbornly, the body of the park in the body solidificandole,but they are deviant parts, at least according to me this happens, doctors call “stress” and stress kills . And look, these formations that are fixed are not as easy to eradicate as a baby in the womb, or like the abandonment of children (We Venetians consider those children who will pay the shoes).

I realize that my attack is verbally abusive, emotionally violent, but there is nothing to fear in terms of physical violence, all this aimed at shaking consciences with the aim of safeguarding human rights, violently attacked and chemically,the human rights of children, too many of whom, Unfortunately, die because of this chemical invasion and nanoparticle of their bodies, according to statistics, about one week.

E’ evidently the will of those who are in fact much more violent, having power, It pursues the suppression of human rights such as those of the Oviedo Convention, which is subversive.

If you want to receive news on the topic vaccines can :
WhatsApp, subscribe to NVX chat info 1
via email, subscribe to the list “No vaccine requirement – Convection Oviedo”