He’ needless to scramble to prove with science and with the logic that the tenets of a religion are unfounded.
In fact, religion is not a rational discourse, but an act of faith. Per il “believer” those who question the dogmas of religion are simply the infidels, and by that very fact they are not credible, They are deceived by a malignant or their deception themselves.
In fact every religion defines good and evil and establishes a moral, often including sexual. Those who violate the precepts is not worth listening to, be marginalized, or enslaved. When this “sorditÃ ” get to lose even the minimum of human empathy, allora il fedele arriva a bruciare od uccidere l’infedele, if necessary, you do agree that the mass graves with so many infidels or even massacres like attacks.
But in the history skeptics he has never killed anyone for his beliefs.
That said, in general, it is quite clear that the theory is a religion of Vaccinations, and as such it is dangerous.
Infatti per esempio da molti anni ci sono numerose ricerche scientifiche che dimostrano la dannositÃ dell’alluminio adiuvante contenuto nei vaccini, the correlation of it with an impressive series of pathologies. And although there are many distinguished scientists “official” that talk about (come Shaw, Exley, Gherardi, Schoenfeld etc. etc) and will publish the issue, The Vaccines Religion is not tarnished, if anything its claims by “excommunication” who in ordinary practice tries to appeal to the science that is official. For more were recentemente confutate anche le poche ridicole ricerche sulla sicurezza dell’alluminio adiuvante.
When I talk about “science” I refer to research published in well-known journals, which were not contested and are also listed in the official database. Personally, I draw mainly from PUBMED. He’ true that there are many other studies that demonstrate the same things but they are not present in PUBMED, and this does not prove that investigations are not valid, ma solo che non c’Ã¨ per quelle ricerche il “crisma” della ufficiale accettazione della autoritÃ di governo. In short, I made the choice “policy” not even trying to compare myself on the ground in some way acknowledging a kind of “potestÃ ” the scientific unscientific bureaucracy. I admit that it is not correct from a scientific point of view, but I do not have the resources nor a salary to be able to forward in the open sea, and it would not help even in the face of religious. Moreover this is a job that should make hundreds of researchers paid by taxpayers.
So in my blog, on the topic of vaccines, you will find only official science and uncontested.
As mentioned, Ã¨ del tutto scientificamente evidente che l’alluminio nei vaccini Ã¨ una vera minaccia per l’umanitÃ , reusing the phrase of Nobel Montagner but affects the whole vaccines.
But there are the fanatics of the vaccine Religion, i corrotti, who do not tolerate that calls into question the dogma.
For example, the minister Lorenzin (a government approved by hundreds of non-elected) Yesterday he embodied how well the violent and intolerant “Religion” of vaccines: He asked the Mayor of Modena to ban the private screening of a film freely available on the internet, Vaxxed, that is the story of the corruption of the American CDC, of the “cover up” some data on the link between vaccinations and autism spectrum, with a series of interviews with mothers who had her son vaccinated, because the autistic syndrome predominantly affects males and especially those color.
The Mayor of Modena responded that “he did not have the power” these are private screening.
And it has the power Lorenzin ? It can prevent you see the things? PuÃ² sovvertire la libertÃ di informazione dell’art.21 della Costituzione? It can deny the human right to “liberamente ricevere informazioni senza interferenza dell’autoritÃ ” the Convention on human rights ?
Il sindaco ha perso l’occasione per mandarla a fanculo e dimostrarsi sensibile ai valori fondamentali del vivere civile.
Comunque ringraziamo la Lorenzin per la grande pubblicitÃ che ha fatto avere alla proiezione e al film Vaxxed che si puÃ liberamente guardare in rete.
PerÃ² c’Ã¨ un problema : if on one hand it is evident that the Lorenzin, or better, la Religione che l’ha indottrinata, is a danger to herself or others ( perchÃ© se puÃ² parlare lo puÃ² fare grazie a quelle libertÃ democratiche che lei stessa mette a rischio), Ã¨ anche evidente che c’Ã¨ il tentativo continuo e sistematico di non dare spazio, to belittle and hide the facts about certain aspects of certain vaccinations.
In fact there are deaths and serious damaged by vaccination which are official and are paid by taxpayers (it's here, please allow me, It is incorrect and should pay the companies as with all commercial products) then there is no denying that do not exist.
but yet, nonostante tutta l’evidenza, si tenta di invertire la realtÃ dei fatti, and accuse the skeptics on vaccines as if they were fanatics.
Accomplices media that sooner or later will have reporters with damaged children, and in fact they are including supporting “mandatory training” on the topic, worse than under fascism and communism.
I found even a search “scientific” in which coloro che parlano di un legame fra vaccinazioni e sindrome autistiche vengono assimilati ai terroristi dell’ISIS. But not as a research demonstration, as a hired , Once again, dogmatic. Rather, the authors are of forensic psychiatrists, ufficialmente di vaccinazioni ne sanno altrettanto di una persona che non si Ã¨ mai informata.Â Ovviamente questi non si sono posti il problema che l’ISIS ammazza e fa fosse comuni mentre gli scettici sui vaccini normalmente hanno letto qualche libro sulla questione oppure hanno avuto dei casi in famiglia di danneggiati.
Questa ricerca parte quindi dall’assunto che chi sostiene il legame vaccini-autismo sia al pari dei terroristi. Authors should seriously consider changing jobs because obviously have no understanding of psychology.
With this fully proves my first statement: Religion is not a rational discourse, but an act of faith. Per il “believer” those who question the dogmas of religion are simply the infidels, and by that very fact they are not credible and are deceived by a malignant or their deception themselves.
Beware you who judge too easily so-called “no vax”, just because they do not belong to your beliefs: admitting their existence, denying them the right to speak, authorizing and applauding people like Lorenzin, finirete per perdere la vostra stessa libertÃ .