Paolo Barnard and praise for tax evasion

Paul Barnard intervenes on the issue of tax evasion .
In a nutshell, it justifies the escape, and says he
– serves to run the economy
– mostly it is carried out by those who need it to spend it
– the state is not weakened in its ability to control inflation or encourage investments and virtuous behavior or to provide services
– the state could create money.
The fact that the Italian state does not actually beat money anymore because it joined the Euro does not seem to be a constraint for Barnard, who supports the idea that services could be financed with the creation of money by the state.

Then he goes back to evasion by saying that citizens adopt evasion when they need it, that is, they require it because they need it, and then it states that the citizens evading expand the scope of state intervention.

It therefore justifies tax evasion on the basis that Italian taxation is excessive, but not the justification for all, not for the overly greedy tax evaders and therefore for the already millionaire tax evaders. But even for the great escape he calculates that there is a mitigating factor, claims that itit actually generates work in turn, economy and taxes. From this indirect effect thus argues that the 50% of the guilt of the evasion (that of the tax evader) it does not do social damage because “DOES NOT take away its public spending capacity from the state, so the rich do not evader escapes us any hospital, Street, asylum, service etc.” because the state could generate money and pay them. While the remaining 50% of guilt lies with the state.

It concludes: “in all cases, tax evasion is NOT a crime that steals goods and services from citizens, because, as mentioned, it is only the wrong ideology of the States that does this”.

I hope you do not take it if Barnard democratically expose my idea saying that the speech is definitely not standing, nor on a practical level, nor on the theoretical level.

Some basic elements not considered by Barnard in fact completely distort his vision.

Meanwhile, there is the fact that gods 270 billion of estimated evasion,from 116 billion / year E 160 they are the turnover of the Mafia, therefore, they did not escape the poor or the rich working, and additional Others 60 billion arising from political corruption (which of course is not declared). ie 270 billion estimated evasion around 200 They escaped from mafias and corruption, no employees or entrepreneurs. So Barnard's speech already can no longer justify “evasion”, but only a minor part of the escaped.

And you know what makes us the Mafia and the Camorra with these escapees money? Certainly not work and employment.

No, No. Mafias and parties with money in black completely change the system operation:
– they distort the market economy by favoring friendly and not honest companies ( apparently at certain levels it does not work even if you do not pay bribes)
– threaten competitors with criminal henchmen determining facto monopolies in some sectors
– they favor the political rise of personalities and parties close to the mafias ready to grant them concessions and favors
– also encourage money laundering through banks, who became master of the democratic system
– control and increase the drug trade, importing as well, but also arms and human organs
– promote financial investments also in multinationals, favoring their delinquent guide
– they export capital to create branches and other support networks where it is easy to recycle
– come to control entire countries that sometimes before they were even Democrats
– special measures are made by politicians such as gambling or recycling of garbage

The result is not job creation at all, but the destruction of the work, of democratic society, and not least of the same environment that has been left to us as a legacy.

I escaped to the money of the mafia add the 60 billions of political corruption because it has about the same effects. For more, from small tenders and mega, the management of earthquakes etc., often emerge the links between political corruption and the Mafia: They are pretty much the same thing.

then, since the great part of the’ evasion creates links between politics and mafia, and in turn generates corruption and distortion of social life, it is obvious and explained why we find ourselves living harassed by a state that is by no means a democratic state, it is actually a state “what they” wanted as it is, then irreformable democratically, and the reforms are generally proposed and implemented by themselves to give themselves even more political and penal untouchability.

Corruption and the funding resulting from corruption distorts the democratic system, because in fact, those who have the capacity do not win the elections, the talent and honesty to improve the company, but instead the player who has his back covered by the media of bribes paid by money and mafias, media and money which are in the hands of banks that often recycle the money of the Mafia. In short, whoever has the money to bribe and pay for advertising also wins locally, not only resulting from illegal financing , but often by corruption and mafia, however arising from evasion. If the Galan case is true, like others, it will be emblematic, but it will be canceled by some reform.

So we come to the conclusion that evasion from this point of view is one of the absolute evils of a democratic society, but just look at the Italian management of gambling, trash, and many other things to conclude that evidently the Italian state is already completely mafia , only a mafia state can allow such things.

On the other hand, the opposite of what Barnard says is certain: the more there is evasion, the more there is social inequality. It is a coincidence that the mafia is more widespread and prosperous where tax evasion is more widespread ?

Also on the issue of the fallout on the territory of evasion, note that in the current system “overall” it is very simple to reinvest illicit money abroad and then re-import it cleanly into Italy, indeed it is advisable not to be discovered. It does not even need to do offshore, just a regular Irish or Bulgarian company, o a Dubai, or just pay some goon games to scratch paying 10% of losses and the money is cleaned up.

So it is nonsense that the great tax evader helps the economy because he reinvests, the opposite is true: it steals money in circulation by bringing it abroad, and often finds it more useful to reinvest it there, therefore on the competition to the territory of origin, ie against the honest, destroying their work. The opposite of what he says Barnard.

But with this I certainly do not want to justify a state colluded or governed by the mafia that reduces its citizens into servitude by overburdening them with taxes and then depriving them of essential services as well.. And that encourages crime and mafias that can launder money with scratch cards. Those who believe that the “state” both Italian, he's a blind fool: the state belongs to a banking mafia that created it by financing the unity of Italy.

What is sure and public is that it gives 20 years both the big capitals and the mafias pay less and less taxes thanks to the ease of laundering money , Barnard thing that was by no means considered. And even before that the state favored these “games” with limited companies and other agreements.

Italy subsists politically because it finances a whole series of parasitic strands that fill people's heads with propaganda lies, propaganda systems that cost a lot, including printing, but also parties, unions, the churches….. all this forces to increase taxes more and more. Obviously the party mafia, It is financed by tax evaders and corrupt, cannot change this system, and being far from going to get the money from their own big tax dodgers, it must increase more and more the taxes of the poor idiots who pay them, jerks in this system, not morally.

also on “creation of money” , I have already explained that it is only a partial problem, because the state, on the other hand, may very well borrow the money from the ECB at today's rate 0,15% of interest (using its own bank under Article 123.2 of the Lisbon Treaty). If you create the money costs nothing (except for inflation) with this system the cost is almost zero, almost like creating it from nothing. Yet the state does not do it, obviously , the state would prefer to take the money from private banks borrow, paying today 3,5% real interest on BOT and CTZ (and banks lend money to the state which in turn borrow from the ECB at 0,15% ). That there is a banking mafias behind? Obviously, there is really a subversive mafia state understood as “community”.

However it is not even true that the creation of money (corresponding to an interest-free loan) is the solution to all problems, because if used to finance various caravans, creates inflation and the same distorting effects of Mafia money.

In fact, the Cassa Depositi e Prestiti “discovered” to be able to use Article 123.2, and could and should finance the real economy. But being that it is led by people of the PD (group that has already burgled MPS in full agreement with the PDL), and being that the’ Italy turns every good idea into a shit, Today's funding operations aimed entirely at their own interests and not for productive companies. Among other things, there is now a virtually zero-interest loan on the table granted by CDP to RAI executives themselves (made by parties) in order to “privatize” RAI which would become the property of the parties or their men.

As usual, therefore,, but this shows us that the creation of money is not the solution to the problem of a corrupt political class.

Finally, the problem is not to justify evasion, this is and remains wrong not only ethically, but also rationally, and makes every project of society fail. Any policy that you propose autodelegittima.

However, it remains the right and even a duty to criminalize the status usurious and wasteful, that will super charge, especially when it does to encourage private banks , creating 1000 billion of debt in euro 20 years, because it is from 1993 that public debt could be refinanced through the ECB by paying only 1% of average interest. Because this is what I discovered and reported to the Court of Auditors, that does nothing.

However, my discovery has already changed the system: for example, no one knows what the bailout fund is for, and banks have started lending money again with mortgages because they see easy enrichment with government bonds fade. No one can explain why Italy has the minimum spread in the face of increasingly worse economic data.

Summarizing, justifying evasion means justifying illegalities and mafias, because it hands him the democratic system.
It also does not look for the true origin of the problems and finds solutions, Rather, It falls in potentially disastrous solutions.

Above shows that we have made a fool of for years so it will not pose solution.

Unfortunately the issue evasion does not escape the ideological camps, but ideologies often mystify the vision of reality to conform it to ideology itself.

I think Baranrd has shown an ideological ruling, and this is an incomplete speech that is rambling. In fact, everyone understands that the rich tax evader, more than the little dodger ( in a proper tax regime), subtracts hospitals, kindergartens, assistance to the elderly, schools etc. etc.. to the others.

We want to give him a medal for this?