The road to Segato will be made: Italian law requires yet 3 years and the prefect has nothing to do with it.

An article from the Gazzettino del 17 October 2013 he told how the prefect of Vicenza had denied authorization to the municipality of Rosà to name a street after Giuseppe Segato, Venetian intellectual and historian.

The article did not explain the prefect's decision, suggesting that it arose from a legal quibble raised by a committee ( probably from the PD).

By reading the prefect's resolution one would have understood more : he refers to an article of Italian law of 23 June 1927, the n. 1188 that in the art. 2 dice: “No street or public square may be named after a person who has not been deceased for at least ten years.” . The prefect had also received the contrary opinion from the “deputation” of history of Venice, required by the standard, which left the prefect no choice, even if he had agreed with the title.

Moreover, even if the road is private, However, it is also for public use, therefore equalised.

So all we have to do is wait a little longer 3 years, and perhaps inaugurate the road on the very day of Bepin Segato's death.

Unfortunately this story was exploited by some Venetian groups.

In particular the Venetian Independence party, through the voice of its president, lawyer. Morosin, he launched fiery words against an alleged violation of the autonomy of the municipality and the work of the prefect ( http://www.indipendenza veneta.com/editoriali/2013/10/17/no-al-prefetto-!-yes’-to-the-way-dedicated-to-bepin-segato.-by-alessio-morosin/ ) .

“We express our total disappointment at the intervention of the prefectural institution in the decisions of a local administration which in absolute autonomy and freedom….”

“Well, in the face of the unbearable and audacious gesture of an entity that shadowily represents the long arm of a foreign government” “brazen provocation and audacious arbitrariness ”

Arbitrary means “abuse” irregular thing. Morosin uses the words of those who do not know the legal rules and follows up with many references to Einaudi who I believe had no intention of dividing Italy.

Too bad all this is unfounded . Morosin forgets or does not know the limits of the autonomy of local authorities. A municipality is subject to laws, like the provinces, and the regions. The subjects are distributed, and in the end everything is concentrated in the Italian government, who also with the hat of “national interest” he does what he wants. The naming of streets is subject to the authorization of the prefect of a centralist state.

Complaining about the prefect's choice as arbitrary (and not a referee) it is the sensational demonstration that the government mechanisms are not known. Yet we propose to create an international government.

Morosin appears to know no law, he even asks to name all the squares dedicated to Rome after his party. I'd be fine with it anyway, but it seems a little to me’ out of register, then we would have to make our way to the PD, the PDL and Italia dei Valori….. oh god no.

It can be said that there is certainly a denial of the Venetian identity, but the prefect does nothing more than do his job on the basis of laws deemed to be in force. The prefect is only a delegate of the government. If you are violating the rules, say so and appeal to the TAR.

There is certainly a cultural repression of the Venetian people, but if you want to change the state of things you have to create a new system with a legitimate and legal method, or start from the illegality of the Italian system.

There is no internal Italian system that allows the birth of autonomy, if not for bilingualism. Rather, Rome is going in the opposite direction to autonomy, ever more centralism, fewer provinces, fewer regions, less autonomy, less power and money for the municipalities.

Even the independence referendum is obviously prohibited by the power structure, in Veneto even consultative action is prohibited!

E’ how to discover hot water: Italy is still fascist in the actual regime.

Hoping to change this system from within is a utopia, only those who do not know the mechanisms of government believe this. And perhaps he believes he can hold a useful referendum which would instead just be a waste of money , private, moreover.

In fact the’ alternative would be the self-determination of the people, but international law must be used, without referendum or anything else, and a municipality cannot proceed, or a region, but only an autopoietic representation of the Venetian people. E’ what we did in the 1999, and even that time Morosin didn't understand well.

Fortunately, this process does not provide any seats until full independence, and therefore ensures that even those who follow self-government end up destroying themselves or making themselves ridiculous.

E’ However, it is completely clear that self-determination, without the mass following that TV gives, leaves us in de facto cultural and fiscal oppression. Who manages to go on TV every 2 days, by not talking about this he actually denies freedom to his people.

For us at the Self-Government of the Veneto People, the prefect must decolonize because he is violating the right of self-government of the Veneto people, but also because the Italian State has been abusive since 1866, having made his soldiers vote in place of the Venetians.

Morosin instead asks this state to hold a referendum, recognizing the legality of its current actions. He cannot then say that the prefect is wrong, as long as its legality is recognized, you can't blame him if he respects it!

In short, if you want the Venetian identity to be respected, we must first recognize that Italian laws do not apply in our territory, because those of the self-governing Venetian people must apply, it is necessary to declare the Italian state abusive since 1866.

And so once again the Venetians have demonstrated that they are not cohesive around serious discussions, and to prefer sterile controversy.

PS: watch out 3 years the path will not be made, then you can shout about racism