I receive from a friend a text published by “Alessio Bettio-Torniego Pan-Voevoda Pulverario-Payment” che giÃ dal nome si capisce molto.
It presents a series of responses that should make me “incacchiare” , of a certain Professor Lipstick.
I answer only to the most erroneous considerations.
“2. THE 1866 CAN HE’ LEGALLY BE PUT UNDER DISCUSSION ?
NO, ALTRIMENTI SAREBBERO DA RIVEDERE I CONFINI DI TUTTI GLI STATI.Â ”
This assumes that all states are hatched from scams, but is not so.
Then he says “L’AUTODETERMINAZIONE DEI POPOLI NON PRENDE IN CONSIDERAZIONI EVENTI AVVENUTI PRIMA DEI DUE CONFLITTI MONDIALI 1945. ”
The path of liberation of Lombardy and Venetia's not about self-determination of a people, ma the release of a state invaded, Lombardy and Veneto. This case is legally without a prescription, there is a right of self-government (that is not to self-determination) Previous to self-determination. This principle does not apply, however, before the 1840. Quindi non vale per ripristinare l’invasa Repubblica Veneta. L’affermazione sui popoli Ã¨ dunque non attinente, as real.
“3. IF YOU HAD WON, WE WOULD BE INDEPENDENT STATES AS VENETI ?
NO, I VENETI ERANO CHIAMATI AD ESPRIMERSI PER RESTARE O SOTTO L’AUSTRIA O SOTTO L’ITALIA, NOT SET FOR AN INTERMEDIATE FORM OF INDEPENDENCE VENETA. SE POI I VENETI FOSSERO RIMASTI SOTTO L’AUSTRIA, IT IS NOT’ CHASED SAID THAT HIS DISAGGREGATION WOULD BACK INDEPENDENT, THIS IS NOT’ GIVEN TO KNOW. CON I “HE” AND WITH “MA”….THE STORY IS NOT !!!”
This is absolutely wrong enough to read the Treaty of Vienne 3 October 1866. Ai Veneti fu data la sovranitÃ , he had received France. So if anything, should you require to France. Ma la Francia formalmente aveva messo la sovranitÃ nelle mani dei “notables” Lombardo-Veneto, some De Betta, Michiel, Emi Keller. These were, however, a “puppet government” the Savoy. To which the assignment was nothing. Il Governo fantoccio infatti cedette la sovranitÃ all’Italia prima ancora del Voto, illegally. Then the puppet government, commissioned by the Italian, decise date e modalitÃ del voto, and even those eligible . The question put to the Venetians in 1866 It is therefore also void the decision of the Italian Government, he had no legitimate presence in the territory. At the plebiscite voted to other Italian soldiers which the Italian government had given the right to vote (illegally) making null and irreconcilable vote.
The teacher knows that when he wants to can read up on my historical and legal findings to better understand the dynamics and showing what was said (and more).
“4. WHO MAY TO QUESTION THE PLEBISCITO ?
SOLO L’ATTUALE REPUBBLICA AUSTRIACA, CHE TUTTAVIA DOVREBBE PRIMA DEFINIRSI EREDE DELL’IMPERO AUSTRO-UNGARICO, CLAIM FOR A UNITED CREATED “TO THIS”, JUST THE SAME EMPIRE, VISTO CHE L’IMPERO MEDESIMO ERA UNA MISCELLANEA DI ETNIE, LANGUAGES, OF, DUCATI ECC….”
Absolutely it is not so, the Habsburgs gave up possession with the Treaty of the Lombardo-Veneto 3 October 1866. If anything, France.
Tuttavia occorre dire che la sovranitÃ ora appartiene alla Unione Europea in virtÃ¹ del trattato di Lisbona. The EU is currently considering what.
With regard to the claims of the Venetian professor feeling, just remember the revolutions of 1848 per capire che i rapporti con l’Austria non erano d’oro: too much tax, too much cultural difference. However the Austrians were only a few hundred in the administration of the Lombardo-Veneto. Nella marina era d’obbligo la lingua veneta. also in 1866 probabilmente i veneti preferivano restare con l’Austria piuttosto che passare all’Italia dato che negli anni 1860-1861 He killed people to the streets in southern Italy.
Questi e altri elementi sono presenti in questo sito e in questa paginaÂ http://www.lombardo-veneto.net/il-lombardo-veneto-puo-tornare-sovrano-in-6-mesi/
These issues could be discussed publicly and constructively, but it prefers to speculate and insinuate doubt, for another with obvious poor results. I veneti sarebbero invece amanti del dialogo franco e della veritÃ , not the sterile and non-documented gossip.