THE “people Venetian” can make a referendum?
in 2012 I published a book explaining that the referendum “regional” For the independence of the Venetian people it is not possible, lining up all legal issues. It didn't want to listen to me, And so it came to the blow of the rejection of the proposal.
Then in September 2013 It also highlighted the regional statute of Veneto expressly PROHIBITED referendum (it “advisory” or did little deliberative matter) Because on subjects non -competence of the Region, the science this explanation
Instead of accusing themselves from their non -knowledge of the legal mechanisms, Now the referendum seeking to blame the “Undemocratic '” that you can not do a regional referendum.
Too easy. It is necessary to unmask the legal incompetence of those who made the proposal. referendum. On the other hand, the referendum proposal has already been changed once, by proposal “deliberative” the advisory proposal, which as mentioned is even prohibited by the Statute. What do you want me to do the regional council facing this? Who is in violation of the statute? REALLY!!!! Yet this is what the Venetian independence lawyer claimed, in early March 2014 He claimed that the Region should deliberate equally even if this will lead to the appeal from the Constitutional Court. For the uninitiated, the lawyer. criminal Morosin ( and not an international lawyer), He is the main proposator of the referendum organized by the Region and the one who sowed, in the resolution regional 42 in 1998 The incorrect concept that the Venetian people consist of only residents of the Veneto Region, total ignorance and denial of the Venetian Friuli- VENEZIA – Giulia in Brescia and Bergamo, that is, in the ignorance of the history and identity of the Venetian people.
Now that the Region has taken note of the impracticability of the referendum path, Among the independenceists, phrases like “You are not even free to do a referendum to understand what the Venetian people want” , And I explain here why the sentence is incorrect, say in false legal substance, it's dangerous.
FACT CAN’ WELL DO THE REFERENDUM OF THE PEOPLE VENETO (and I have never said otherwise) , BUT IT CAN NOT’ DO THE REFERENDUM REGIONAL (which would also be invalid / illegal).
I explain for the hundredth time. The Veneto region, since it is an entity of the Italian Republic, it is an actual body of the state, own a piece of the state, and it is banned from the independent declaration of art. 5 of the Constitution because it would obviously be a violation. This has been clarified and sentenced by the Constitutional Court in sentence n. 365/2007 , but it is a established principle and put in the foundations of’Self-Government of the Venetian People I proposed and founded by me in 1999. the region, says the sentence and is obvious, It is nothing more than a piece of the Republic and cannot make international politics.
The basic error lies in the fact that independent political movements (I think in the first Morosin 1998) The incorrect equation "Veneto" = "Government of the Venetian people" were invented , and the even more ignorant one “people = Venetian Italian residents ” And this is completely false historically and legally. I wonder : because those of the Venice that is in Friuli-Venezia-Giulia would not be Venetian?
What they do Morosin and all those who propose referendums or plebiscites limited to “Veneto region” It is a violation of the legal legal law of the Veneto people, that is, of the right to one's identity and territorial extension: Declare non -Venetians of Venice is an international violation of the rights of the Venetian people, I have not deepened if it is also relevant in international criminal law, But if it is certainly not it should be . And likewise, for the prohibition of imposition of nationality to the downs of a territory, It is a violation of human rights to impose Venetian nationality for all residents of the Venezie, when in fact maybe they are Italian or of other ethnicity and intend to remain so.
With what right someone allows themselves to determine for others who is or is not Veneto or Italian? This hateful practice of forced assimilation was created by Fascism in Istria and Dalmatia as well as in South Tyrol , or it was implemented, in religious, by Muslim Turks who imposed the orthodox Islamic Turks to declare or giving them the only alternative to losing your job. We are at the point that these alleged Venetian want to impose similar solutions to those who are not Venetians, but at the same time denying the Veneto outside its region the same logic to the contrary, imposing not to be Venetian because otherwise they should be summoned to an alleged referendum.
On the other hand, He admitted the birth of a state as large as the Veneto Region Veneto, We could not then demand the annexation of the neighboring Venetian territories in the future (Friuli, Venezia Giulia, Napoli Trent, Venice Lombarda) by virtue of the international legal principle of the territorial integrity of other states.
Then why this anti -anti -anti -anti? The suspicion that is increasingly finding is a simple electoral sign that aims at the regional elections of 2015, in short, a mock election mirror independence. According to this logic, Whoever professes the referendum and independence today are actually only pretending with the aim of collecting consent, to extort a vote, maybe money and signatures, But in reality he intends to do exactly the opposite of independence, namely to reinforce the Italian system via the mock election legitimacy.
However, it is clear that it can be said that the Venetians are only the residents of the Veneto Region only when history is unknown, The language and identity of the Venetian people, and in practice in substance disclaims and there rubs of the Venetian people.
That many are independent boggles are also understood because they recognize legality to Italy that in reality in Lombardy-Veneto has arrived with an invasion in 1859 and then in 1866 : according to studies that I made and published in 2007, The Venetians have never legally voted for annexation, The Insubre and Veneta-Lombard area never even voted for annexation as it was due for the treatise of the 1866. Politicians point to the regional chair with salaries beyond 12.000 EUR / month, speeches like these do not make them, Rather, I deridono, thus hiding the legal and legal reality. How it can be independentist who denies the fact that the Venetians are already’ Free because they are annexed illegally? Clearly denying these historical facts to the Venetians prevents them from understanding how to exercise their freedom, that is, through the self -government of the Venetian people in Lombardo-Veneto.
It is not true that the Venetian people cannot make a referendum, ONLY THE REGION VENETO’ Forbidden to announce it.
If the Venetian People wanted to do an international referendum could very well do it, course by consulting only the Venetians , naturally in consultation with all the Venetians , which from the international legal point of view go from Bergamo to Udine on the basis of international history and sovereignty.
Nothing prevents the Venetian People of making an international referendum, only to announce it has to be a Self-government body of the Venetian People, that is, a provisional government born according to the trappings of the international law. Of course, some referendums and falsehood drug dealers would like to declare themselves such, But the fact is that this government exists , and was established in 1999 (see website ), and it is incredible, for you who read, Legal recognized even by the Italian judiciary in 2002. So because you don't know anything about it ?
Only now among the Veneto citizens we are beginning to understand the scope of the foundation of the 1999, while the Italian state and the Freemasons have understood very well, so much that, in my opinion, create a targeted series of acts of sabotage and false independence, to confuse the people of Veneto, and ill-Parade (plan B) reduce it to a staterello overlooking public debts inherited from Italy (which they are illegal as a colonial state debt) and thus not returnable, one therefore statelet, Private historical lands, interdicted at sea, more slave than the Italy of foreign debt is, and thus in short beggared.
The question becomes: a referendum of the Venetians only from Bergamo to Udine, It would be valid for international purposes? Under certain conditions.
Yes if first he returned to the self -government full of the whole territory , then the Italian state must first decolonize in favor of the institutions of the Lombardo-Veneto (resurrected on the institutions of the Venetian People), and only if the referendum was done in full self-government of the Lombardo-Veneto and only for that portion Venetian, only then could have international legal force. In other words, It needs to be done what was expected from Vienna International Treaty 1866, cié a referendum of Veneti, Insubri and Mantovani, Ask them if they want to remain independent ( are already legally sovereign) or if instead annex to Italy. The treaty actually included the vote for the annexation to the Savoy monarchy, And it is not certain that Italy Republic is the legal heir of the monarchy, as I shown here .
By simplifying everything, Since Italy has invaded Lombardo-Veneto, Now if you come home and even PAY DAMAGES. Other than public debt in common as they want the false independence.
NO REFERENDUM WILL’ NEVER CEASE VALID UNLESS BEFORE THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS, Tomfoolery NO FRAUD OR PAPER OR CALL TELEMATICA PLEBISCITO REFERENDUM OR THAT IT WANTS CAN’ BE BINDING UNLESS YOU MAKE VOTE ONLY AREAS ENTITLED TO BE VOTED (LE VENICE) AND ALL THOSE ENTITLED (ALL THE PEOPLE VENETO).
http://www.lombardo-veneto.net
