L'opinione di Loris Palmerini
a different point of view
  • Worthy of Note
    • On me
  • Newsletter
  • Right
    • Human rights
    • Justice
    • International
  • economy
    • banks
    • finance and credit
    • Ambient
    • State Wear
  • Science
    • Food and Health
    • technology
    • Salute
    • Vaccinations
  • Culture
    • History
    • Venetie
    • Current events and history of the Veneto people
      • Venetian Language
    • Lombardo-Veneto
    • Policy
    • Ecology
  • Policy
  • Vaccines
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • PayPal Donations
  • Contact
20 November 2021

Here because “the legal fiction” it does not find substantial application in our legal system of “civil law” strongly Napoleonic.

Right, International individual self-determination, legal fiction, SOVEREIGNTY 0


The difference between the legal fiction and other law enforcement mechanisms such as presumption, analogy and extensive interpretation.

In practice, a distinction must be made between law and reality and at the end the text concludes by saying that “in reality, then, fictio helps as a remedium ultimum where the case is such that it does not allow the application of any current legislation; it is resorted to, therefore, to fiction when, not even in the process of extensive and analogical interpretation, a rule may come to be applicable to a given factual situation.“.

In fact, art. 2 of the Preleggi on “sources of law” he says that “The formation of laws and the issuance of government acts having the force of law are governed by constitutional laws.“

In other words, the hierarchy of sources is based on the Italian Constitution, which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden. which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden, which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden.

which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden “legal fiction” which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden. which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden.

which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden.

which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden “which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden” which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden, which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden, which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden “which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden” which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden.

which has the intrinsic principle that everything is allowed except what is forbidden (EU), something authorized by various sentences of the Constitutional Court .

The state has made a norm , an Italian law, implementation of EU rules, says they prevail over Italian law, in particular, EU regulations directly prevail (which disapply the Italian law if in conflict) and in some cases also the EU Directives which would instead be framework laws.

For this mechanism of accession to the EU, Italy no longer manages the currency, the defence, a part of justice, not even borders and immigration, as well as the movement of people. For example EU citizens can apply and vote in any EU city where they reside, and they can reside anywhere in the EU.

This is not known by many alleged politicians, in fact, for example, they do not know that one cannot leave the Euro while remaining in the European Union, Why “The Union has a currency and this currency is the Euro”. E’ It is true that there are EU states that do not have the euro, but in fact they are managed by the ECB and will be abandoned in the future.

However, with the Lisbon Treaty of 2009 even the EU has given up part of its sovereignty as it joined the European Council. The latter is the body that recognizes and regulates human rights and the rights of minorities. The rules of the Council of Europe prevail over those of the EU. We must not confuse the Council of Europe with the European Council.

Finally, the rules of the UN, as they have been ratified directly by Italy but also by other EU states, are part of the “Community acquis” o common law of EU states.
In fact, other special treaties such as that of NATO prevail over all these norms.

Leaving aside the latter, we can therefore substantially trace the hierarchy of sources in current Italian law :
1) Norms of the Council of Europe, (CEDU, OVIEDO etc.)
2) European Union standards, in particular the regulations
3) Italian Constitution and Constitutional rules
4) UN rules when ratified and enforced
5) Laws of the State and resolutions of the “Special authorities” according to law
6) Regional Norms (and autonomous provinces) in exclusive or implementing matters in concurrent matters
7) Provincial Norms
8) Uses and Customs

When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws, When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws, When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws, When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws.

When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws “legal fiction” When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws, When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws (When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws) When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws, When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws “rules” When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws.

When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws “legal fiction” When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws, When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws.

When it is not possible to solve a specific case in the light of this enormous mass of laws, for example, there are those who believe that there is a law that says that if a child is registered in capital letters in the certificate at birth, for example, there are those who believe that there is a law that says that if a child is registered in capital letters in the certificate at birth; for example, there are those who believe that there is a law that says that if a child is registered in capital letters in the certificate at birth://for example, there are those who believe that there is a law that says that if a child is registered in capital letters in the certificate at birth , for example, there are those who believe that there is a law that says that if a child is registered in capital letters in the certificate at birth. for example, there are those who believe that there is a law that says that if a child is registered in capital letters in the certificate at birth, for example, there are those who believe that there is a law that says that if a child is registered in capital letters in the certificate at birth, for example, there are those who believe that there is a law that says that if a child is registered in capital letters in the certificate at birth .

In practice, the interpretation of facts and reality are not admissible when they are not compatible with the provisions of the law, and legal fictions or customs do not prevail.

This type of trivial and basic errors are avoided if before studying the specific facts you study the relevant rules, and if before these the organization of the rules is studied, exactly, the hierarchy of sources.

So basically , if you want to cultivate the law, it is necessary to start from a good manual on human rights that gives a reference framework of the limits that the laws can have. Then you can proceed to a manual of constitutional law to understand the Italian framework, and one of European law that now prevails.

However, if the intention is to question the sovereignty of a state, for example, we want to pursue the self-determination of a people (which is governed by international laws) obviously it is necessary to study one or more manuals of international law, of “individual” ) because states don't joke about this, you really risk the heavy jail.

Finally, there are those who believe that one is possible “individual self-determination”: even a child understands that no state can legally predict such a thing, therefore I recommend that you study the civil and criminal procedures carefully to understand how the state works, and above all the Criminal Code.

But above all, verify that it is a hoax for which the states are a corporation, at least until they are declared as such by law



No Green Pass, Padua and Treviso united to say no. The legal foundations of the various Venetian liberation movements or committees do not exist

Related Posts

Venice_1797_fatalgiorno

Current events and history of the Veneto people, Right, International, Lombardo-Veneto, History, Venetie

The Republic of Venice is dead? No, changed its name

Andrea Tavini reported on Facebook a writing by Antonella Todesco concerning the last days of the Republic of Venice, or better, of the aristocratic form of government. “THE BEGINNING OF THE END… Nell’ April 1797 Lippomano writes to his son-in-law Querini: “It is not necessary for me to give you the details of our misfortunes, I would increase the […]

Registration in the civil registry as slavery and the commercial exploitation of the straw man: one fool after another.

BUFFALO, Human rights, Right, International

Registration in the civil registry as slavery and the commercial exploitation of the straw man: one fool after another.

There are those who argue that thanks to the registration in the registry office a new born (a person) it is placed as a guarantee of the public debt of the state. For example, he stated this in the transmission of the 29/4/22 a certain Raffaele Gavuglio (I believe it is https://www.facebook.com/raffaele.gavuglio), who has publicly been said to be a profound student of the subject. If it were true that every […]

Right, International

Pro-Italy evening on individual self-determination, the hoax demonstrated

In this video, the document available below is displayed and the hierarchy of sources is explained and the theory of individual self-determination unraveled. Unfortunately, the management of the evening was unable to keep the debate on track, allowing interlocutors to ask non-questions, but real rallies that prevented the […]

triad

Food and Health, banks, Human rights, Right, economy, Espianti, finance and credit, staff, Policy, Salute

Direct popular democracy in all regions, bills to block abusive medical trials on minors, 5G abuse, and to restore local credit.

The Triad of Freedom is made up of an initial series of three popular bills addressed to the regions we citizens. These are: 1 – Informed Consent in Medicine, DNA protection from modification, protection of the human embryo, prohibition of experimentation on healthy children, health self-determination. 2 – the savings banks have lost […]

self-government_people_veneto_1866

Current events and history of the Veneto people, Right, International, Lombardo-Veneto, Venetie

from the 2012 the Veneto people can no longer make new self-determination, only that of the 1999.

The recognition of constitutional status of the right to “Self-Government of the Venetian People” given by Article 2 of Law n.340 / 1971, combined with the right of self-determination of peoples given by the Italian ratification of “International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights” which took place with law 881/1977, legally allowed the self-determination of the Venetian people (and not citizens of the Veneto Region) which is […]

medical-freedom

Human rights, Right, Vaccines

Illegal Over-50 Obligation- Illegal Over-50 Obligation

This model of appeal against the obligation to vaccinate over 50, written by me and entrusted to the Human Rights Committee, economic and social (DUES Committee) it is different from the others on the net because it mentions two ratified international laws ( the Oviedo Convention and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) that […]

You must log in to post a comment.

Search in the site

Recommended Sites

  • Venetian aggregation
  • Institutions of Lombardo-Veneto
  • Venetian customs

Categories

Recent Posts

  • DEAR DAMAGED BY VACCINE, I WRITE TO YOU.
  • The Republic of Venice is dead? No, changed its name
  • The WSJ also says not to vaccinate children
  • Registration in the civil registry as slavery and the commercial exploitation of the straw man: one fool after another.
  • Pro-Italy evening on individual self-determination, the hoax demonstrated
L'opinione di Loris Palmerini
  • Worthy of Note
    • On me
  • Newsletter
  • Right
    • Human rights
    • Justice
    • International
  • economy
    • banks
    • finance and credit
    • Ambient
    • State Wear
  • Science
    • Food and Health
    • technology
    • Salute
    • Vaccinations
  • Culture
    • History
    • Venetie
    • Current events and history of the Veneto people
      • Venetian Language
    • Lombardo-Veneto
    • Policy
    • Ecology
  • Policy
  • Vaccines
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • PayPal Donations
  • Contact
Reproduction entirely reserved - Loris Palmerini 1995 and the following