Democratic, anti-communist, antifascist and human rights.

I exist, and I have a right to not be what decides a central government, if compatible with the democratic society and respect for the community that generated me.

Among my fundamental rights will be then the right to own the means of livelihood for me and my family.

The idea that private property is abolished is therefore anti -high, Why He would like to prevent each one from the realization of the fundamental right of self -remoteness and his family. For this reason every communist ideology must be demonized and the parties that propose should be prohibited as those that propose the dictatorship and the suppression of the elections. Of course this does not mean that you should not work to eliminate all obstacles to the full realization of each, in a democratic society. Unlike, it must obviously be provided, in a democratic society, to the removal of the too great concentrations of wealth and power that prevent it, and eradicate and preventing every de facto monopoly.

In short, there is the freedom to possess, and it must exist, But there is no freedom to possess others and not even to get to this amount of power and wealth to be created to others.

There is therefore the freedom of business, but not to damage the socio-economic and environmental fabric with its own wealth.

Leg, Since I gained my philosophy, The center of speech are human rights, and not the rights “natural” which are irrational and not shared. Human rights are codified, they are shared, are granted, the rights “natural” I'm a bale for those who just want to do what most interests them without rules, And often they call the “natural rights” To hide other much more petty and clear purposes.

That's why many don't like: I do not make myself combine from ideologies and ideological comparisons, having my reference in human rights.