Daniel Trabucco confirms my thesis , though …

In the legal magazine Read today the jurist Daniele Trabucco puts in line many inconsistencies of the referendum path proposed by the Avv. Alessio Morosin of Independence Veneta, declaring without appeal unfounded on the international plane and with no hope also in terms of domestic law.

I found his speech did well on many aspects, especially on the Kosovo issue.

Almost all the arguments carried out by Trabucco were analyzed in mine “The referendum that cannot be held“, of the 2012. It was therefore enough to read me so as not to waste time with the Morosin proposal.

However my approach, by independence Veneto, it is certainly more open to possibility of independence, which in fact exist, The same trabucco indirectly confirm them.

In fact, between my theses and those of Trabucco there is total coincidence in the last step where he writes “Lastly, claim an independence of the "Veneto" from Italy indicating the boundaries of the current Veneto region for the new state, and at the same time refer to the plebiscite for the annexation of the 1866 (in resolution n. 44/2012 the Veneto Regional Council) and his alleged nullity appears contradictory. In fact the territories attached to 1866, Once belonging to the Republic of Venice, then to the Lombard-Veneto kingdom, they go far beyond the regional territory. For example, it is not included, If not in a small part, Friuli Veneto (current provinces of Udine and Pordenone), while in the other hand there are parts of the current Veneto who have not participated in the plebiscite, Like the Ampezzo today part of the province of Belluno. All the inhabitants of the territories attached in 1866 they should have the same right of self -determination, And it is paradoxical to claim it absolutely only to those who are within borders traced only after by Italy, excluding all the others. This makes the completely extrinsic character of the connection between the claim of the independent Veneto and the Republic of Venice even more evident, with which historical memory is used to give prestige to the new Veneto state, All focused on the mainland, Which would be different from the dominant Serenissima.”

And precisely starting from this concept of the correct Venetian people on the historical and legal level that in 1999 History has begun of the self -government of the Venetian people, which is nothing more than the correct self -determination carried out following international law in an autopoietic way, therefore without referendum but flawless in terms of law, so much so that the magistrates who denounced us by attack on the Constitution then had to archive everything .

Personally I say these things from 1997, Ever since, After the events of the bell tower, I began to study the history of the Venetian people and the Venetian Republic simultaneously with the laws, Then coming to discover the combined provisions of the laws that give us independence in the street of self -government (that is, without referendum but as an act of legitimate international self -determination).

Unfortunately I explained those things to Morosin in the idea that would have made good use of it and collaborated. And instead he appropriated without ever mentioning the author, but he used them incorrectly or perhaps mystifying to make the famous resolution without my knowledge 42 of the 1998. E’ This is an act whose knowledge only in 2006, but that is useless because it is wrong in the basic conception of the Venetian people, which identifies as residents of the Region, Capital error repeated in the regional law on the referendum.

Morosin evidently did not know the history of the Venetian people, But evidently not even the legal facts of the Venetian people, as it has no interest in the language of the Veneto people, But if it is true that of the Venetian people we can speak in many ways, Certainly there is no historical and/or legal sense to coincide with only residents of the Veneto Region.

Suffice a paradox: If tomorrow it was formed, as they would like to Rome, A new region of Garda with Brescia, Verona and Mantua, It would mean that Verona would no longer be Venetian ? And who said that Brescia is not Veneta ?

On the other hand on the inconsistency of the identification between “Venetian” E “Residents of the Veneto Region” The Cassation in the 2011 on our appeal, which I have given wide visibility.

Unfortunately, Morosin proposes a bad way that is in fact useless if not even harmful on the level of the identity of the Venetian people. It has now hunted into a cul de sacs without return , Since not even the voters seem to give him the consent that serves for a serious battle of independence. Unless it is just to reach the coveted “carega” regional, even at the cost of telling political bales consciously.

And for the same reasons it is quite evident that the operation of “referendum” digital part 2014 by Gianluca Busato and members , always carried out only in the Italian region “Veneto”. And on the other hand, that operation was a bats without foundation with completely invented results is evident that the beyond 2 millions of votes declared, even missed the 13.000 signatures for the regional candidacy, so they tell me. In fact, I told Busato's online votes were no longer than 10.000 .

We hope that after the fake regional elections we can reason with the mosored field by these projects unfounded on the legal level as are those of Bortotto, De Pieri and Avv. Selmo.