Competition between public and private

To two pharmaceutical companies the Italian antitrust gave a full -bodied fine for doing “cartel” forcing the health care system to buy a drug from the cost of 800 euro per pack instead of another equivalent of the cost 40 times lower.

According to the Antitrustust, the two powerful pharmaceutical companies have come to the point that since the same drug trials, from the beginning of their creations, they were flown to make two different commercial uses while they are equivalent.

The exorbitant cost of piloted forced medication many patients give up treatment, not caring at all.

This highlights some of the Big-Pharma behaviors that have been known for years to many sailors, but that had never been exposed by “institutions” Italian, And I am leaving for the idea that this will not even happen in the future, In my opinion, the exception of this president of Antitrustust will not last long.

Returning to the case, failure induced cure in patients not well-off does not, in this case, deadly effects, The disease is not fatal, But I assure the reader that there are similar cases of pharmaceutical fraud on fatal diseases in which the consequence of the lack of care is death, that is, these are murders induced by institutional behaviors caused by the great leaders of some pharmaceuticals, premeditated murder in a voluntary manner and direct.

The problem for us and our children is : as the big raids into institutionalized these killers and to the heads of these institutions killer ? There is no doubt that these behaviors will not stop until they are sanctioned. E’ a nonsense to think that these habitual offenders change their attitudes to a simple change of “weather” cultural. THE “male” dwells in each of us, And only the bond not to do is determined by society and punishment means that it does not spread. these great criminals often are nothing more than poorly educated children in which the meaning of “authority” E “fault” has not been adequately instilled. And unfortunately with some adults there is nothing to do, they can only be imprisoned so much theirs is rooted “want” crime.

In the case of BigPharma boys responsible for the above cases, I would put them in detention just to act as a test guinea pigs for pharmaceutical or medical protocols for their illnesses.

The story gives me the starting point to return to the evidence that left and right are two deaths who died and also wrong from the beginning.

I generally defined parties “right” have in common the idea that the state should be reduced to carrying out essential tasks, such as the army, Justice, public order, while everything else, Healthcare including, It should be left to private management.

Of course this is the extreme position , because there is also a right “social”, minority, which instead sees in the state intervention a useful tool for development of the company. The social right, It is actually a form of socialism, which should be more correctly classified as “socialism” right-wing. English speakers in fact distinguish between right socialism (Fascism and Nazism) and leftist socialism (Social Democrats and Communists).

In any case, generally the “left” It is the one that proposes for a state intervention in the economy and in the more or less strong society.
Among them, There are those who say that the state must intervene in everything, coming to lean on effects for the real Socialism or Communism, while there are those who more blandly propose to a strong presence of the state also in the economy in order to “to correct” the imbalances caused by an uncontrolled market.

Yet both on closer inspection these currents are all based on an ideological prejudicial that does not want to deal with the evidence of reality: both in the state apparatus, both in private companies, individuals can just make a sign to block the competition and maintain their power.

E’ very simple to understand why in large structures the increase in inevitably is inevitable. Already Max Weber had enunciated as in large public and private institutions the increase in constant inefficiency derives from the fact that those who are promoted is placed in a role in which it has no ability, And so while it would have been an excellent worker in the place where the trust for promotion had conquered, It will be an incapable of the role assumed, resulting in a worsening of the overall efficiency.

The large public and private institutions are intended to become increasingly inefficient and increasingly large until they are dismembered or destroyed or reformed, but this is only for reasons “external”.

Individuals can also just try to escape the competition rules, whether you're in the public , whether they are in the private.

The case of BigPharma shows that for these large private companies does not exist “invisible hand” the market regulates everything, And whoever believes to these fairy tales is a fool since he gives 6 years the private world economy is drugged by the injection of public money of the Fed and the ECB.

Who says that the state must spend (left) and who says that the state must do just the essentials (right), just they do not take into account what people do in both cases: a sign of power, not to say that they do Mafia.

In both cases they go against collective interest, which instead is also made of small adjustments and efficiently to the detriment of one category to improve the condition of another.

Wherever the pragmatic approach is adopted free of right and left philosophies, the results were evident.

In Germany, the state intervenes heavily, especially in social and health care, but leave it to the market if there are no problems, while always attentive to fight public and private mafiette with legal and operational mechanisms that prevent.
At the base of the company, however, there must be the actual value of the “law” , therefore the efficiency of justice, otherwise nothing can work and indeed, prevail mafias.

When in 1995 I enucleated these concepts in my political program “Italy Concrete” I had not studied the history of the Venetian Republic, which for centuries it has implemented these principles. That's why when the principles “liberals” they appeared, Venetians have not adopted them, because they are superficial approximations of reality in the eyes of those who deal with it.

And it is clear that liberalism does not work, because the USA, more extreme application of those principles, stand only because the Fed has put 40.000 billion in the capitalist system, And we are already talking about an incoming financial hecatombe determined by new scams to which no one in place after the precedents of Lehman-Brothers.

Who still thinks with the right and left, He has his mind framed in the 1700 schemes that have not served to bring freedom to the individual, but only wars.

With the principles of “freedom” individual, In reality, the revolution and wars of destruction of the historical states have justified themselves (like the Venetian Republic), and in reality these subversion and wars were financed by bank and usurer characters that in the end, today, lead us to misery for their only enrichment.

The “Italian” They have in front of them decades payment of debts “public” Actually determined by private banks, companies “private” , pharmaceutical companies, and the lack of efficiency of the state that is necessary for these private enrichments.

But instead it is possible to create a system where the competition is always held open not only in private systems, but also the public ones, and also between public and private systems systems. What I am saying? You did not understand ? sure, These are things you can't have heard if you haven't already listened to me in the past.

Between public and private sectors must be competitive, that's what I already said in 1995.

The State must guarantee the public service where the private individual cannot make up, but the state must leave the possibility of a private individual to make up for his own services, so that when things are not efficient state is forced to self-reform.

Let's take a simple example. I am not at all convinced that Bocconi University is more qualifying than the CA’ Foscari University of Venice, but we pretend that are equivalent.

The Bocconi has played about service 15.000 EUR / year per student. Ca’ Foscari probably spends (and costs to the taxpayer) 30.000 EUR / year per student. What should the state to put in competition Ca’ Foscari with Bocconi?

Instead of financing universities, he should give the student the right to study, engaging him to do the exams within certain time, and assigning its annual cost (20.000 EUR / year) to the university he decides to attend, who deserved his trust.

In other words, the Ca’ Foscari should become more efficient, having to remain in costs 20.000 EUR / year per student, Bocconi could do better by having more money available.

Now, With the Italian system, this is impossible because there is no justice and legality. forget a “Italy” European. Unfortunately, we must break up the institutions and return to the pre-unification states.

In the meantime I found that liberalism and socialism are two cultural and mental errors (as they do not deal with the reality of human being) but errors that led to “right” and “left”, or if you prefer to contradict liberalism-socialism, Ideas that in reality refer to two fundamental theories evidently both incorrect regarding man, who is a gregarium.

I coasts false oppositions seem to own the classic triadic “thesis-antithesis-synthesis” so dear to the Masons, And in fact they are models that lead to the annihilation of the person. Because it is evident: Freemasonry does not pursue man's freedom, But his enslavement to a system that does not even have the honest-truth of declaring himself publicly.