The Italian military occupation in Lombardy-Venetia has been unveiled since 1866

in 2006 I read "the transfer of Veneto" , Memorial Thaon Revel who was the Plenipotentiary Commissioner of the Italian Government in 1866 . It is also found books on Google for free.

The title is misleading, it should be "the cession of Lombardy-Veneto" which was then legally a State-Kingdom with 60 years of existence and was the successor to the Venetian Republic.

in 1866 the Italian troops had entered the territory because it had been left free by the Habsburgs who had defeated them only a few months earlier both on land in Custoza and at sea in Lissa.

The Italian Government legally only had to guarantee public order at the time of the vote, and instead Revel, Commissioner himself, tells us about some of the plots that were organized to prevent the populations of Lombardy-Veneto from voting freely for independence or annexation to the Italian government. In fact there was a real risk that they would prefer to remain independent as the riots had already shown 1848 which they had been concluded with the expulsion of the Savoy, It did well represented by the Memorial Carlo Cattaneo, Also it on Google Books.

In order not to miss out on one of the richest kingdoms in Europe, the Italian Government, that he patched ass, formed a “secret committee” , who operated by threatening with death all those who professed for the independence of Lombardy-Veneto, threatening species Habsburg wire, and making sure that all the prefectures were controlled by secret emissaries of the Italians.

The Italian Government also allowed itself to decide the voting methods, shamelessly denying it when the chance came to discover the French mediator.

Instead, according to international treaties, the legitimate representatives of Lombardy-Veneto had to receive sovereignty into their own hands, then carry out the plebiscite, freely deciding the voting methods and having all the populations of Lombardy-Veneto vote, and then possibly hand over sovereignty to the Italian Government.

The secret committee, however, threatened with death any unwanted representative who dared to become the international representative for the operation., in order to get the full control of the Italian Government at the time of the passage of cards under the Treaty . At the end the representative of France, which it acted as a guarantor of international, he found himself in front 3 people who "strangely" were those indicated by the Italian government weeks earlier, and who in reality were frontmen of the same, that is, a “puppet” government according to international law, illegally signed acts Untitled, that is, invalidly .

To highlight these elements of scarring to the international treaty in accordance with the requirements of international law, not only implies knowledge of international law, but means makes null and irremediable the result according to the same. In short, the territory has never been legally Italian, and there is no "usucaption" for it, and it will never be unless after a free and sovereign vote of the entire Lombardy-Veneto and annexed Venetian lands.

E’ It is also true that the Italian Government organized the vote in order to obtain a planned result, and in the memorial Thaon di Revel himself wrote that already days before the vote "we control most of the prefectures". So certainly the result of the Plebiscite was prepackaged , and there are those who talk about voting fraud, but this concept of "scam" is nevertheless misleading for the purposes of international value and does not demonstrate its nullity. Let me explain: although it has been shown that in many places there were more votes than voters, and that in some places the cards were never scrutinized, if this is "politically" unacceptable, it is also sufficient to legally invalidate the annexation in international law ? No.

This explains why many newspapers and political leaders speak publicly about the "scam": it does not invalidate the legitimate presence of the Italian Government in the Lombardo-Veneto area.

But since 2006 my website I brought lucegli legal elements that according to international law make it null and incurable the result of the vote of the 1866.

These are elements which I then did write in many applications submitted too many European judiciaries, at the request of those who addressed me in my capacity as President of the Veneto People's Court, work for which I never asked any money while behind me, some people close to me illegally pocketed money, but they were discovered. (those who had paid me money contacts).

in 2007 I published the book "the Republic never born" which mainly deals with the referendum of 1946, illegal well as it, because they didn't vote Istrians, Dalmatians and citizens of many other lands legally Italian, only later ceded by the "republic" which was never legally valid. The Venetian question is addressed for the first time with a cut in the legal right to sovereignty in force, as well as brief history.

In that first version I had already written that even the plebiscite of 1866 for the annexation of Lombardy-Veneto it is not valid, I wrote that it wasn't because the whole of Lombardy wasn't allowed to vote with the exception of Mantua. in conclusion, as he had denied the internationally legitimate Italian military presence in Lombardy, the International Treaty provided for a plebiscite of all the Lombardo-Veneto, including Lombardy . Instead, the Italian Government did not control and rig the vote in the Venetian provinces including Udine and Pordenone, and Mantova, but he didn't even make the entire region of today's "Lombardy" vote at all, which already then constituted more than 50% the population of the territory subject to international bond.

As for the referendum 1946 which lacks a quorum of confirmatory results, in “The Republic never born” I underlined that not even the plebiscite of 1866 may be valid because more than 50% of eligible voters was excluded from the vote by fraud.

today, anniversary of the seizure of the Venetian vote, the second edition of my "La Repubblica mai nata" is ready, revised and expanded right on 1866. In it I have taken up many elements that have already passed before the eyes of various judiciaries and which are being brought to the attention of the Council of Europe due to an appeal of mine presented in 2009. Mine in the Council of Europe is a proceeding which concerns precisely the illegality of the Italian Government in Lombardy-Veneto because it has no jurisdiction from the beginning, and what it actually exercises illegally violates human rights in many aspects, as for the impartiality of the judge, excluded from the start, the denial of bilingualism, and even the violation of the Constitution itself, for example in tax commissions.

There are those who are trying to block these appeals with fantastic games that we will soon make public, Basic are once again pretending to be the representative government of the Veneto. But this time they are destined to lose and the civilization of truth will win over that of kidnapping and silence.

For those who would like a copy of the book call me or write me your address, cost 5 Euro + postage.

Loris Palmerini