UCC, on the other hand, is only a proposal for a commercial code to which each US state has given differentiated adhesion

UCC, on the other hand, is only a proposal for a commercial code to which each US state has given differentiated adhesion “Individual sovereignty” UCC, on the other hand, is only a proposal for a commercial code to which each US state has given differentiated adhesion, ideas also spread by a trade union group venetista.

UCC, on the other hand, is only a proposal for a commercial code to which each US state has given differentiated adhesion, because written in capital letters (but writing with cursive creates problems, that's why you do it!), and then they say to the judge to be sovereign in the flesh, that they are not part of the TRUST of which the corporation "Italy" would be part.

I have already explained years ago this is bullshit, a state-owned company is confused with the state itself. As if the owner of a limited liability company was the same Ltd..

Instead we need to know that the Italian justice thinks not with the laws, much less with justice, not with human rights, but with the criterion of the minimum effort and damage in the appearance of justice.

When someone is presented to a judge and say bullshit like this, who is sovereign, chasing the buffalo OPPT etc., the judge (who does not know everything, indeed, he is often not really suited to being a judge) Meanwhile it takes time, find a loophole to postpone the sanction, and then he studies us. And when he realizes that OPPT is a hoax, it exacerbates and sours towards the accused or convicted or fined and massacres him more than before.

Unfortunately, there were releases that took place like this, because the judge was taken by surprise, not for the act of sovereignty, but why a “their” judges agreed, then become imprisonments without discount, put back into the sovereign, and this to more than one “sovereignist”.

The act of sovereignty can, in my opinion, only lead to irritate the judge, It has no real effectiveness.
There is only the sovereignty of peoples and states, there is no sovereign individual anywhere in the world.

There is no law in this extreme individualism, it never existed, and it would be incompatible with any society.

We assume that no, nobody, is sovereign, Only small children think they are and even those they realize not at all.

Not even the true rulers, monarchs, they are sovereign, they too must undergo the will of the peoples. E’ vero, some people can tame, but not forever.

The reality is that there are some companies that guarantee fundamental rights, others that do not guarantee them, but what I am “fundamental rights” I am not what each believes, there are international treaties that speak of fundamental rights, and even those are easily violated.

So individual sovereignty is a purely school concept, dear to anarchists, libertarian and liberal, who then are those who just want to get their own way to the detriment of the common interests of the population and to the detriment of the common environment.

But I find it absolutely right and necessary that is not allowed at all to use radioactive material to make an atomic bomb or a nuclear power plant. I find it necessary to not allow the mafia to make organ trafficking and arms and drugs etc.. I find it necessary that we can not “sovereignly” abandon garbage everywhere. I do not have violations “SOVEREIGNTY” but necessity for the existence of the company. With this, of course, individual freedoms or sovereignties must be limited to the minimum possible, but to think that any prohibition is unfair is really a silly and childish concept. To think that the state is useless and that it is the problem is foolish, because without a state there is no self-regulating collectivity, but the law of the most delinquent is always established, not even that of the strongest, but of the most murderer and delinquent.

Sovereignty as the OPPT proposes does not find application anywhere, I think it is a hoax: has anyone ever contacted the alleged founder? It is certainly false that all states are corporations, are registered only a few , and they are shell companies.

I ask sovranisti: it is not that by chance whoever tells you to do “the act of sovereignty” you're only sending the massacre a few its end ?

Yet, a norm is a criterion that must come from legitimate institutions. There is nowhere and there cannot be the discretion of individuals or the president of the state who do what they want. No state in the world works like this or can stand like this, much less did the Venetian Republic work like this. The Venetian tradition is that things are done “consiliarmente”, and it is much more tiring than doing it to Renzi or Berlusconi.
The main source of individual freedom are the national institutions, when these are lacking or lacking the source of sovereignty becomes physical or armed force. That's why people shoot thieves, because the state is absent.

Territorial sovereignty arises precisely from the awareness of different individuals of having to work together to have institutions that serve to guarantee certain individual freedoms, in the awareness that no one is totally sovereign regardless of the existence and proper functioning of these institutions.

Italians are neither free nor sovereign, They are subject to a system of power that gangs vie for power, always to the detriment of the population. The only steps “progress” that take place in Italy are determined by the evolution of the Western world to which Italy unworthily belongs, and that's all it is “West” prove to be great not even it! The "West" is based on the monopoly of money, oil, weapons,of drugs, and information control, for the royal government of the West (the bankers) human rights Fuck them as soon as possible.

If you go to a judge and declare your sovereignty because he is a part , in your opinion, West of that trust, sooner or later you will find yourself dealing with the exercise of HIS sovereignty given to him by the West, that he slams human rights.

In short, individual sovereignty is the legal space in which you are allowed to act within a legal system, that normally is called State. The state should respect the fundamental rights, the so-called human rights, which I am not an abstract concept or intuitive, are exclusively those listed in international standards “Human rights”. Rather, the same international standards are often betrayed, the space stated is not even truthful. For example, we fight terrorists in the name of freedom, but we do business with those who earn from terrorism, by weapons, from oil ……. violating human rights and promoting their violation!

Outside of the legal human rights, the individual can dream, may ask, but there is no sovereignty, there are only the gossip and the theories, I repeat only theories and dreams.

Now, remember that president of the Chamber of Commerce in Sicily who was arrested for mafia in the middle of the conference against the mafia?

Well, in the same way there are those who spread and encourage “SOVEREIGNTY” individual in order to take possession of your assets!

These theories on sovereignty, take hold of some spirits “free”, but in reality they are only theories, and often those who tell you about them want to send you to the massacre to create anarchy on their behalf. Rather, I have been told more cases of people sent to clash with the institutions in order to make money later, with lawyers and assistance that are offered when the individual is massacred by the institutions, so that the prey comes to be even willing to give up its assets in order to protect them from slaughter, and instead he is giving them to those who sent him to the massacre, knowing that he would be in trouble!

If you understand the above step you are not stupid, otherwise you may easily end up in that situation.

For as I see it, if you want more freedom, if the system you live in is unfair, Is 4 options: 1 – you adapt and accept so living like a rat, and this is the prevailing mentality in Italy , 2 – emigrate to a more just country, 3 – fight for the change of the current system, 4- fight to replace the current system with another, maybe a previous state.

I opt for the option 4, why accept the system as it is done, unfair,It is not part of my Venetian culture, always less we. However, emigrating is not easy, better than staying, but one always lives halfway as emigrants. And in any case, I have proved it in a thousand ways, the Italian system is unreformable, from justice, so I decided 16 years ago to stay and work to restore the previous state, with new and fairer foundations.

I work to restore the sovereignty of the Venetian people, the only legally armored and secure sovereignty that will allow us to exercise individual sovereignty in a peaceful and just society, as we have been able to make us Venetian several times.. Obviously a sovereignty compatible with living in common.

So the future institutions will have to be compatible with international law, based on human rights, but on the philosophy and practice of the Venetian Republic.

I repeat: territorial sovereignty arises precisely from the awareness of different individuals who must work together to have institutions that serve to guarantee certain individual freedoms, in the awareness that no one is totally sovereign regardless of the existence and proper functioning of these institutions.

Do not be fooled by theories “SOVEREIGNTY” that instead they serve to send the massacre, because someone is already there waiting for the moment of your difficulty and weakness to take possession of what little freedom and goods you have today.

And know when that happens, you will no longer even have the little protection of the institutions that is given to you today, because you yourself will have made them your enemies by declaring them illegal .