These covid-19 vaccines really do?

In one study appeared in Lancet Microbe it 20 April 2021 the authors highlighted the real effectiveness of the anti Covid-19 vaccines, showing that the pharmaceutical companies have presented the data in a misleading way, practically hiding the real effectiveness of their products which is actually miserable. In short, the innkeeper said that the wine is good.

In a passage of the article we read “The effectiveness of the vaccine is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). Relative risk is used (RR), i.e. the ratio of infection rates in vaccinated to unvaccinated – which is expressed as 1-RR. The classification based on the reported effectiveness gives reductions in the relative risk of 95% for Pfizer-BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna-NIH, 91% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&j, E 67% for AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccines. However, the RRR must be seen in relation to the underlying risk of being infected and falling ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. ” I also add seasonal.

The authors continue : “Although the RRR only considers participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the reduction of absolute risk (ARR), which is the difference between infection rates with and without a vaccine, considers the entire population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRR: 1,3% per l’AstraZeneca-Oxford, 1,2% for the Moderna-NIH, 1,2% for the J&j, 0,93% for the Gamaleya, E 0,84% for Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines.“

Practically, in reality, given the risk of contracting the virus and becoming ill, the vaccine is practically useless in terms of preventing the fatal outcome of the Covid-19 disease. However, this assumes that nothing is done to cure the symptoms, that is, if you don't cure people by practicing the “Watchful waiting”.

The reality, however, is that several studies have been telling us for months that the disease is highly curable, not only with hydroxychloroquine, but even better with Ivermectin and other drugs.

In addition to hundreds of doctors who practice the treatment of the disease with the protocols developed by care associations, there are also Nobel laureates , Nobel candidates and distinguished scientists who are warning us by telling us NOT to let us practice this experimental gene therapy.

The reality is that there have been tens of thousands of deaths from these vaccines, but the causal relationship is systematically ignored, it is said that it was not the vaccine but a previous disease, or one “genetic predisposition”, reversing that logical relationship that before even those who died of a heart attack had died from the effects of the virus if they tested positive with a test that returns false positives to the 95%.

In addition to deaths, by the thousands, paralysis occurs, heart attack, stroke, and thrombi everywhere, also because of the Spike protein that the vaccine induces to produce.

On the other hand, there are numerous cases of abortions following the vaccine, it appears that the Spike protein accumulates in the ovaries and some scientists speak openly of the risk of permanent infertility.

in conclusion, the effectiveness in preventing the disease would be almost nil, and instead there are certainly many risks that are run in vaccinating with these which in fact vaccines are not because they are gene therapies.

Moreover, nothing is known about the long-term effects, there is an impressive increase in leukemia.

E’ It is clear that, after all, there is no concrete benefit if the risk / benefit ratio is seriously and scientifically calculated, especially for those with less than 80 years for which the percentage of risk of a bad outcome is very low. In summer, however, the risk is practically non-existent.

I “I think” to science, to the Nobel Prizes, not to Speranza and its plethora of professors who are obviously incompetent, or they are corrupted by the power system.

Note: The piece extracted from the research has been translated with the website www.DeepL.com , because it seems that in making certain translations the Google service is losing pieces or in any case does not do as good a job.