For the 95% saving Italy is not worth the sacrifices required: better to die?

“>Italy ? For the 95% of the voters is not even valid i 1000 euros of sacrifices required for the year 2012.

E’ the result of a survey carried out by an important local television network, Antenna 3 Northeast ( link ) that transmits in the Venetie ( Friuli Venezia Giulia, Veneto and Trentino) and all over Italy through the Sky bouquet.

The channel asked its viewers if i 1000 euro / year required by the maneuver to save Italy are sacrifices that are worth making: THE 95% he answered “No”.

What are the reasons for such a striking result ?

E’ I note that the surveys are conditioned by how the questions are proposed, for example, when asking for the approval of the leaders but only those that are liked by the media system are listed, you are already’ conditioning the result and the satisfaction of the same.

in this case, put the sacrifices in connection with the “save Italy” certainly poses a problem, ma e’ also true that the required sacrifices will be much greater than 1000 euros suggested: this figure is the usual average for the chicken, for some there will be’ much more’ sacrifice, for others, none as usual.

Furthermore the sample e’ representative of a specific region, the Triveneto but also of those who follow it “public service” .

And then there is the audience on sky that the channel counts.

All in all a good sample of “Venetian” who seem to have understood that they will be paying more as usual.

It is not known what are the reasons for this refusal of sacrifice by this sample of people.

Perhaps the Venetians expected that with the crisis and forced by the situation they would finally hit the caste, not just politicians, but also state parasitism, the false invalids the total evaders of other territories.

And instead they see the usual Italy that unnecessarily drags on in a continuous worsening that drags them to the bottom.

A country that with the flood of 2010 they realized that it is there for everyone but not for them.
Natural conclusions after that for years the parasitic administrations have always been saved and the virtuous ones penalized, and perhaps this has weighed on the poll : sacrifices are useless because there is no repaid merit.

What is certain is that among the Venetians now e’ common perception that making sacrifices for this Italian system is not worth the effort, Rather, MORE’ you do your part and more’ maybe you are mocked and disparaged, and maybe accused of racism and selfishness.

Even this maneuver has shown them once again that they always hit only those who already’ pagano, renouncing to bring out the very large pockets of illegality and evasion in other parts of Italy , just as instead of reclaiming parasitic administrations, they are saved and equal cuts are implemented for all which penalize or reduce virtuous administrations at closure .

In short, the survey shows only that even the Venetians now think that it is not worth making sacrifices when the first not to do their duty and’ the state itself, perceived as an enemy but’ you have to make friends, and maybe it's best to exploit him if possible since he'll give you a damn first.

From this point of view, in short, the Venetians are very late acquiring the southern mentality that has learned earlier and better to survive., this is also a consequence of the historical fact that for the South Italy arrived as an invasion (operated by the British) rather than a popular will. In fact, a unification never requested even by the Venetians.

In short, the concept that dying for the Italian homeland seems very distant, or even just sacrifice for it, is a value: if ever there was, there is no more. Rather, it is now entering the head that sacrifices only serve to end in misery, and indirectly that it is necessary to get rid of the parasite constituted by the Italy system itself.

The television lies and all the demagogy of the Italian government no longer serve to change the reality of the facts in front of the eyes of the people.

A key to interpretation that has the advantage of also explaining the sudden change of the Northern League to barricade positions after having consented to the amnesties of parasitic administrations for years: probably a poll showed him where to go to collect votes.