The wild idea of independence through the regional body
think of a region of the Italian state as if it were a state in itself and’ A fundamental and elementary error, as beginner of the law, Certainly as a person not suitable to govern a delicate passage like the one that is proposed, a passage that of “secession” that easily, let's never forget, slips into the war. If you put a monkey driving a plane, We don't expect a soft landing. The referendums want the good of the people or a tear that risks war?
then, to stay on the piece, legally Lombardy cannot invoke a political succession (and much less legal) with some previous state. It should first different in 3 At least, because Mantua did too “state”. Another case is Emilia-Romagna which is precisely made up of 2 territories with different legal stories, as well as costumes, held together with force, so much, for example, expression 2 miss diverse.
In another way the Veneto Region of today, which is not only a very small portion of the ex- Venetian Republic (maybe a fifth), but also a reduced portion of the “Veneto” annexed to Italy in 1866. On the other hand, the ethnically Veneto territory legally passed to Italy in 1866 it consisted of the whole territory from Bergamo to Udine, to that at least for the last 4 centuries preceding annexation had always shared the Venetian fate. Not to mention that he was from Venetia and Histria even before the Romans.
The Friuli Venezia Giulia Region also, whose territory for the 95% It has always been in the Venetian history, E
