The lawyer is wrong ? E’ your fault

In the election campaign Grillo denounced how the city of Rome alone has more lawyers from the entire England. The theme of the excessive number of lawyers has been raised other times, as well as the fact that the accountant is that figure holding your accounting, but if he misses you pay.

The fact is that since there is the unit of Italy, good ideas are always born decreasing and are forced to emigrate, while bad habits (that before remained divided between states) They intersect each other fertilizzandosi and always leading us to a further deterioration.

So we came to today for which the many lawyers, if they make mistakes , E’ PURE CLIENT'S FAULT, that is, they are useless, But the customer is obliged to use it.

[wpcol_3quarter id=”” class=”” style=””]
To establish this state of fact is “the Third Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court, Judgment No. 2757 of the 18 January 2013” , The client must collaborate with the lawyer and has the obligation to supervise the conduct of the assignment , “also to avoid negative consequences to himself”. in conclusion, If the client does not assist the lawyer and the wrong one, The client in the face of the courts cannot invoke the poor knowledge of the law to his excuse. So far we could be there: if obstacles well as your lawyer , not pretend that he can defend well . But then we come to the climax: The customer cannot invoke the poor knowledge of the law and not even the assignment he placed in his defender. That is to say that it is mandatory to have a lawyer who defends you but you have to know the law better than him ?[/wpcol_3quarter] [wpcol_1quarter_end id=”” class=”” style=””]
[/wpcol_1quarter_end]

In fact, in Italy it is not possible to defend itself despite this despite being provided as an international human law from the L.N.881/1977. In the Italian system to defend it takes a qualified technician so as not to waste time at the courts so overworked. Let us assume that it is reasonable (In reality it is not) , But then if it is assumed that the customer by himself would not be able to defend himself, as can be pretended to be pretended by the same that he has the knowledge that controls the lawyer and supervising it on it?

What reason there is to oblige a citizen to rely on a technician when in reality he is forced to be better than him ? Or, Why impose on citizens to have a lawyer if it is not guaranteed that the lawyer is professional and responsible for the inability? Because he demands from doctors, technicians, chemists and other categories a professional liability and not by the lawyer?

If the citizen who has entrusted himself to a technician he must know how and more than him, why it is required to pay a third instead of providing for itself?

In Italy there are too many lawyers, They are starving, so many are forced to make “judges” fees and taxes, in violation of the constitution, to which the judiciary , the parliament, The municipalities are full of lawyers lent to other things that despite this defend the category to which they belong without actually belong to you for real. Not only, the judge, When he is also a lawyer, it cannot be impartial, These 2 roles requiring two completely different mindsets, mentally covers opposite and contradictory roles, so it is likely to suffer from the same imbalances as multiple personality patients. Certainly it cannot have the necessary serenity of judgment.

Furthermore, the lawyer swears loyalty not to the laws, but the Italian NATION, which instead has lost most of its sovereignty in front of Europe and the world. What should the judge-advocate when it was to apply a provision of the EU that actually detract from the Italian state powers as imposed disapply Italian law ?

The lawyer then, When only the lawyer is, In Italy, however, it does not serve to defend the defendant and human rights in a full way, but it serves to ensure the power system, is a system agent, as the accountant.

This is why the international law establishes the citizen's right to defend himself : The system-state would be faced with its legal liability without intermediate defenders, responsibility that is not assumed today thanks to the complicity of lawyers, a caste, who for their own interests, but also for fear of the system, I do not even fight, Especially since it is an inefficient system in which in fact they thrive and in fact thrive because the system is inefficient.

Not only in Italy there are too many lawyers, Add to this that they are not often not prepared quite, and when they are doing everything to not alienate the system that makes them powerful. Obviously there are exceptions, few, and the regime systematically affects making them lose the processes and bringing them to the misery.

Italy's cancer, Before Berlusconi, was justice, And today it is even more. There was a time when Berlusconi could have raced the reform of justice, but instead he arose in pursuing his economic interests and the hooves of which he was a visitor. Now the system, gone mad, he will turn against him, shall put in jail, The regime needs the power and money that has accumulated to the detriment of Italy.
That's why it's an alarm: we are all in danger! The defendants know that the first concern must be the lawyer of the Vs control. It takes at least 2, one that presents the cards, the other who controls him without his knowledge. And change from time to time controller, or they will agree.