The revolution does not need Berlusconi
Berlusconi made a move from the great master of politics.
In one fell swoop he managed to resume the center of the scene by putting long -term politicians in the corner. But it's just for a while.
There was fine, a politician of profession from 50 years, who had passed it in the polls, And by now he pointed straight to the country's government .
Fini was ready after clearingd herself from the past Missino going to Israel to pray. He had even said he wanted to vote for immigrants so dear to globalism. And he had gathered the phantanian from false signatures and his wife with the related bribes scandal.
beautiful than ready, Instead Fini finds himself in one day condemned to do what he has always been: The party of 5%. Too bad he will have to tear him to “the right” that Berlusconi will sell us on television as the latest cream necessary for an old Italy.
Fini was fooled as a political pivello, and now he is as shit as a lover left and even sides with his left to resolve the “great” problem of the conflict of interest.
But it could not end up when he was in government and Gasparri signed the TV law without even reading it?
The problem is that those who have the TV actually controls democracy.
Fini had not understood that Berlusconi makes the faithful servants make his way, as confalonieri, Utri, Galan ecc, But the servants must always be a step under the dwarf, otherwise that is pissed off and sends you to the brambles.
Of course a great politician must not be if he did not understand this elementary evidence. Al 5% forever!
But Berlusconi is deluding himself too.
He knows that he is condemned to be remembered as what his problems has been solved, returning to the 5000 billions of debts and not serving the prison, But that for the country has done nothing of anything.
And he knows that only this will remain of him because the judge will neither red nor the people, But the time.
In fact Berlusconi is of the 1936, he has 71 years. If at elections we went between 3 years he would have almost 75 years, While the andropyusa already begins to glimpse despite the new hair.
The people are tired of the old to the government and of presidents from the triti and typical tattered speeches of the old. He is mounting in the country the desire to see 40 and 50-enrolls to the government, As in his time Blair, Like Sarkosy that is '55, with Aznar who was in government a 50 years.
Like the President of the Sardinia Region Soru, of ’57, that is, he yes, dismantling parasitism and giving a boost of efficiency.
berlusconi, Fini and Bossi could do it, but they preferred to return the country to the communists of 70 years. Have lost their turn.
Not even Prodi will be the reformer, because he has the strength to stay in the government, but not that to make reforms.
There is Veltroni, which is of '55 and could also play a role of “young”.
then , In order not to play the Veltroni-Fini game, Berlusconi with his move, has broken up everything, because he is one who if he cannot win then overturns the table.
But he will not be able to get to elections before the 2009, or even in 2011, A 75 years playing.
In fact before the 2009 The parliamentarians do not mature pension, As Tremonti said, and therefore are calm that Berlusconi's continuous SBRìto on the elections was only a means of curbing the fall of popularity with respect to purposes.
But overturning the table and placing politics in the new perspective of struggle between Pd and PDL, instead of between right and left, Berlusconi will do a favor to the country, that is, to remove power from the parties of the 1 E 2 %.
I said it in 1994 that the proportional system was better with the barrier to 5%, German style, maybe al 4% for Italy. But are calm that the breed politicians will want it to 3% or al 2%. Also because with the 4% The League would also remain outside leaving independence without false illusions.
in conclusion, I'm afraid it's completely useless, Because politicians will return to the First Republic with the tangent system, Now that the judiciary is again on the short leash , See Mastella case – Prodi.
The solution always and only remains to make a tabula rasa of the Italian Parliament, which no longer is needed in united Europe, and make confederate states in Europe.
Antenna
24 November 2007 @ 20:29
The institutional problems of Berlusca, they will bring it to the lions pit, or they will raise it into the sky of the new gods ?
To posterity the arduous sentence.
To us fatal npoveri only the consideration that, If the Silvio exceeds himself, ne sicuramente Ben where.
Jumping the ditches is not an easy business, Not even for him.
That God rewards him at the most for everything he deserves, both for good, than in evil.
Nunzio Miccoli
24 November 2007 @ 12:17
There is a recurring thesis that states that those who control television wins, But Berlusconi, Maòlgrado his televisions, has lost the elections.
Evidently the Italians are not foolish, Indeed, On the market it is stated that advertising is useful, but you can not ignore the claimed product that must be good.
In brackets, I am one who does not vote and I didn't even like the government of the left before that of Berlusconi; for my judgment on the current one, you can still wait a little, or the judgment will be from the polls, But attention to electoral fraud that can come from the right, left, from the interiors and the government!
Cordially.
Nunzio Miccoli
Salvatore Polistena
24 November 2007 @ 11:56
My dear friend
> If I allow tenterò €œ€€, to answer your questions, leaving
> by an essential premursa:
> The â € œ ItalianPolo ", This abstract entity, sublimated by a sovereignty
> recognized by a constitution, written by the party, He has not
> never exercised its power recognized on the Constitutional Charter,
> through the democratic representativeness, EXPLOYED BY THE â € œ
> mandate ", through its vote; Because the Partitocracy, who drafted the
> rules, He always kicks.
> In fact the game of vote, expressed by the people, in the predtto â € œ
> mandate there has a very serious vice, that affects this contract Sin
> from origin, to the point of becoming, under the appearance, purely legal
> IN no, for the specified reasons:
> 1) The mandate in question, expressed through the vote, It is without one
> specific content, Which means that it is blank;
> 2) Those who have to exercise, the hypothetical mandate, already spoiled to
> Source, are subjects chosen by the parties, central level, and not a
> basic level;
> These two serious contractual defects are enough to affect, Since the beginning,
> at the level of nullity, this contract.
> Therefore, those sovereign people, cited by the first article of the Constitution is
> Consequently, an abstract entity, to which it was usurped in fact and of
> right its peculiar power.
> About your interrogations, I think they, a-priori, they are badly placed
> to origin, Just when talking about Berlusconi, associate it with
> â € ortrolutionâ €.
> Ma that of mai, The revolution has never been generated by a single man, For
> His personal reasons, due to diatribes among its allies, that since
> from the beginning, they have never seen his desire for a great grandi of a
> single party????? How do you call me â € œVived the whim of a
> MAN, who has the capital on his side (Not the one written by Marx), THE
> televisions and newspapers????? Who promoted, because he wanted it, with
> Gazebi throughout Italy, A collection of signatures, To send home
> the current government, regularly elected by the outcome of the polls, With mandate
> five -year? How does it invoke the rules, When he is the first to
> ignore him.
> Anyway, Berlusca is all a case in itself, It is the paradox of paradoxes.
> He believes that with his money he can make Italy, Not a Republic,
> But his personal company. Anyway, I return to the concept of
> â € œVived "it assumes this meaning when it is done by the people, E
> not from those sold and picked up, without shame of his mega
> performance!!!!!
>
> Where the â € œRivoluration of Berlusconi brings us ?
>
> To nothing done! why, clumsy for how it is, how did he do not
> understand that the â € œGrande party "of the coalition he, will not never
> make it?
> As he did not understand that by putting storace against Fini, so
> so clumsy (At all Macchiavellica) The whole an an?
> As he did not understand that the â € œLeghaâ € never unites the coalition,
> For the simple reason that they have only one flag called
> â € œPadaniaâ € they want and demand their precise identity ?
> As he did not understand that Casini and his companions, or sooner or later they will come
> to constitute a strong center?
> I wonder, But who are those of his delicious councilors??? O yesue and a
> to have his clumsy initiatives to him or to him???? (Of these
> The jokes are full). Therefore this â € œRervectionâ €, as you want it
> call us to make the left strong, that until before yes
> found in great difficulty .
>
> It is a revolution or an extreme theater stroke ?
>
> I think I have given the answer in your previous question. It is clear
> that it is not about, of theater in the most less than Teatrino, because to do
> both one, not the other is needed, E IL NS. poor man (of
> spirit) it is completely devoid of it!!!
> To get his business, have to have an army of
> Consultants of High Finance and Lawyers (That only he can afford to
> To have). But, the moment they lose sight of him, it hunts
> immediately in trouble, because it is strongly clumsy.
>
> ends, the betrayed lover, Where to finish ?
>
> Clearly, He will be strongly in antithesis to Berlusca, After all, ask you
> his!!!!!
>
> And the communists ?
>
> The Communists, As you call them, they are above all and regardless of everything
> â € œInant-Berlusconianiâ € therefore, CVD (As you wanted to demonstrate) they will not do
> never fall the government, Despite their distinctions and their muggni. Tantâ € ™ è
> it is true that the famous â € œSpallataâ €, so much desired by Berlusca, it is never
> occurrence, just because they are vaccinated (Anti-Berlusche).
>
> Reforms ?
>
> When, take into account(Berlusca), that his maneuver to make a new
> match, It was a clumsy move, which caused him more damage that
> consents, will be forced to align with those reforms desired by
> left and its three allies, who seem, Finally, decide with
> their own. Since you have to realize, Innazi to evidence and the
> crowd of his advisers to have made a mistake throughout the line, Sara
> forced, waves avoid a “Coporetateâ€, to align to safeguard the
> Higher good of the Italian nation.
>
> We want to bet??????????????????????????????????
Salvatore Polistena
24 November 2007 @ 11:52
My dear friend
> If it allowed me to try “I”, to answer your questions, leaving
> by an essential premursa:
> THE “Italian people”, This abstract entity, sublimated by a sovereignty
> recognized by a constitution, written by the party, He has not
> never exercised its power recognized on the Constitutional Charter,
> through the democratic representativeness, completed by “Contract of
> mandate”, through its vote; Because the Partitocracy, who drafted the
> rules, He always kicks.
> In fact the game of vote, expressed by the people, in the predtto “Contract of
> mandate” has a very serious vice, that affects this contract Sin
> from the origin, to the point of becoming, in terms of, purely legal
> IN no, for the specified reasons:
> 1) The mandate in question, expressed through the vote, It is without one
> specific content, Which means that it is blank;
> 2) Those who have to exercise, The hypothetical mandate, already spoiled to
> Source, are subjects chosen by the parties, central level, and not a
> basic level;
> These two serious contractual defects are enough to affect, from the beginning,
> at the nullity level, this contract.
> Therefore, those sovereign people, cited by the first article of the Constitution is
> Consequently, an abstract entity, to which it was usurped in fact and of
> right its peculiar power.
> About your interrogations, I think they, a-priori, they are badly placed
> all’origine, Just when talking about Berlusconi, associate it with
> “Revolution”.
> Ma that of mai, The revolution has never been generated by a single man, For
> His personal reasons, due to diatribes among its allies, that since
> from the beginning, they have never seen his desire for a great grandi of a
> single party????? How do you call me “Revolution” the whim of a
> MAN, who has the capital on his side (Not the one written by Marx), THE
> televisions and newspapers????? Who promoted, because he wanted it, with
> Gazebi throughout Italy, A collection of signatures, To send home
> the current government, regularly elected by the outcome of the polls, With mandate
> five -year? How does it invoke the rules, When he is the first to
> ignore him.
> Anyway, Berlusca is all a case in itself, It is the paradox of paradoxes.
> He believes that with his money he can make Italy, Not a Republic,
> But his personal company. Anyway, I return to the concept of
> “Revolution” It assumes this meaning when it is done by the people, E
> not from those sold and picked up, without shame of his mega
> performance!!!!!
>
> Where it brings us the “Revolution” by Berlusconi ?
>
> To nothing done! why, clumsy for how it is, how did he do not
> understand that the “Big party” of the coalition he, will not never
> make it?
> As he did not understand that by putting storace against Fini, so
> so clumsy (At all Macchiavellica) The whole was inimated?
> As he did not understand that the “Forgote” never joins the coalition,
> For the simple reason that they have only one flag called
> “Padania” They are want and demand their precise identity ?
> As he did not understand that Casini and his companions, or sooner or later they will come
> to constitute a strong center?
> I wonder, But who are those of his delicious councilors??? O yesue and a
> to have his clumsy initiatives to him or to him???? (Of these
> The jokes are full). Therefore such “Revolution”, as you want it
> call us to make the left strong, that until before yes
> found in great difficulty .
>
> E’ A revolution or an extreme theater coup ?
>
> I think I have given the answer in your previous question. E’ CLEAR
> that it is not about, of theater in the most less than Teatrino, because to do
> is one, The other is not necessary, E IL NS. poor man (of
> spirit) it is completely devoid of it!!!
> To get his business, have to have an army of
> Consultants of High Finance and Lawyers (That only he can afford to
> To have). But, the moment they lose sight of him, it hunts
> immediately in trouble, because it is strongly clumsy.
>
> ends, the betrayed lover, Where to finish ?
>
> Clearly, He will be strongly in antithesis to Berlusca, After all, ask you
> his!!!!!
>
> And the communists ?
>
> The Communists, As you call them, they are above all and regardless of everything
> “Anti-Berlusconi” therefore, CVD (As you wanted to demonstrate) they will not do
> never fall the government, Despite their distinctions and their muggni. Tant’è
> it is true that the famous “shoulder”, so much desired by Berlusca, it is never
> occurrence, just because they are vaccinated (Anti-Berlusche).
>
> Reforms ?
>
> When, take into account(Berlusca), that his maneuver to make a new
> match, It was a clumsy move, which caused him more damage that
> consents, will be forced to align with those reforms desired by
> left and its three allies, who seem, Finally, decide with
> their own. Since you have to realize, Innazi to evidence and the
> crowd of his advisers to have made a mistake throughout the line, Sara
> forced, in order to avoid a “Chief”, to align to safeguard the
> Higher good of the Italian nation.
>
> We want to bet??????????????????????????????????
Silvio
23 November 2007 @ 22:43
But because Maroni does not emerge? I have a great esteem for him as a man and as a politician!
Pietro Lonato
23 November 2007 @ 18:09
Clear exposure, even shareable. It makes you think and reminds when the moment will be.
On the other hand, arrive at a democracy as in our thoughts, It is like having to learn to swim. You have to give time to time and you have to continually train up to a day, that certainly arrives , You will notice or notice, that everything is so natural almost in the order of things.
Step by step, to walk with quick……
Carlo Attanasio
23 November 2007 @ 17:48
Holy words, Too bad that in Italy, despite the fact that we speak so much, and sometimes also well, In the end nothing ends, for this “Dictatorship” of young and old politicians and above all for the corrupt economic power that together command Italy and beyond, We, poor people ox and even sometimes perhaps less ox, We will never be able to make anything raise and have a semblance of justice.