Registration in the civil registry as slavery and the commercial exploitation of the straw man: one fool after another.
There are those who argue that thanks to the registration in the registry office a new born (a person) it is placed as a guarantee of the public debt of the state. For example he affirmed it in the transmission of the 29/4/22 a certain Raffaele Gavuglio (I think it is https://www.facebook.com/raffaele.gavuglio), who has publicly been said to be a profound student of the subject.
If it were true that every new born increases the solvency of a state, here then is the very numerous states, like for example India, Senegal, or others, they should be more solvent than very small countries like Luxembourg, San Marino etc., and in any case more solvent even than countries such as Italy, but it doesn't turn out like that at all, so the statement is obvious nonsense.
Yet Gavuglio insists that in some way the registration in the civil registry corresponds to the registration of a commercial name on which it comes fact of business.
Gavuglio's error derives from the fact that he does not keep in mind or does not learn what I have demonstrated with the documents in the same transmission, that is, that they are prohibited by various international treaties that Italy has ratified both slavery and similar conditions, and conditions similar to servitude. Point.
Practically, if there is an Italian regulation or law, also a regulation, that somehow said “when they register you in the registry office you become a servant or a slave” Or “when they register you in the registry you become a guarantor of the public debt “, these would be Italian regulations that are invalid and voidable before the Court because, based on the elementary concept of the hierarchy of sources, international law would prevail over domestic law.
On the other hand, if so, when a citizen (or if you prefer a person registered in the Italian registry) emigrated and went to reside abroad, you would see a debt in your personal checking account, and since this does not happen, or there is a rule that dictates where this debt goes, or the initial hypothesis is nonsense.
Said this, unfortunately it must be recognized that there are Italian laws that violate internationally recognized human rights. To give a current example, the obligation of the over-50s to undergo an experimental vaccination wanted by the Draghi dictatorship violates the “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” (ratified by law 881/1977) which prohibits obliging a person to undergo a medical or scientific experiment. However this obligation “vaccine” illegal will not last, it will certainly be canceled by the judiciary when someone begins to request compliance with that rule or when the vaccine will no longer be experimental.
But in the case of the “hoax” by Gavuglio, where is the rule that says that by registering with the registry office the person becomes a servant or slave or that he is placed as a guarantee for the public debt? The reality is that such a norm of “service” Simply does not exist, it is an invention of those who tell this nonsense, and since it is necessary to be serious and precise on these issues, the only person who makes it is obliged to prove the validity of the statement first, otherwise it is simply a lob. Otherwise anyone is free to say the nonsense they prefer without any feedback. but, I also say that if by chance someone will ever manage to point me to such a norm, from now on I undertake to apologize and have it canceled with an appeal.
For those who have paid the “academies” and the courses to be told these and other lies it is a harsh reality to accept that you have paid to be told about the nonsense invented by the speakers or repeated without verification. If with that money they had paid real actors to make them play a play, culture would certainly have grown more truthfully and without creating confusion and false expectations.
What Gavuglio say about registering at the registry office is a pure invention because it is not proven by any law, and even there was a law contrary to international law, it could simply be deleted, but the reality is that such a law does not exist.
For more, among other nonsense, Raffaele Gavuglio stated in the registry office that “meanwhile, this public quoted register has been mandatory since 1939”.
As I explained in the video, the Republic of Venice has kept the registers since 1300 circa, but Ernesto, a spectator, verified by discovering that even the Kingdom d’ Italy (born in 1861) obviously governed the registry registration with the “ROYAL DECREE 31 DECEMBER 1864, n. 2105 “Which prescribes the keeping of a population register in every municipality of the Kingdom, and approves the related Regulations.”
Gavuglio would have easily avoided such an obviously bizarre statement if he had consulted at least Wikipedia before making it, it also reports in the “History of the Registry in Italy” the following text “The Kingdom of Italy established the first non-mandatory registry in each municipality with the RD 31 DECEMBER 1864, n. 2105. On the occasion of the second census, it made it mandatory by law 20 June 1871, n. 297 regulating it with subsequent regulations: 4 April 1873 E 21 October 1901, n. 445.”
Actually Wikipedia should also be correct, because the RD 31 DECEMBER 1864, n. 2105 reads the article 1 that “The population register ordered by the royal decree 30 DECEMBER 1861, 2105 must be completed in each municipality [..]”, that is, it already existed before but was not mandatory until 1864.
What about these bullshit theories ?
They arise from the made-up claim that “all states are SEC registered corporations”, and this is also a completely made-up statement: in fact, not all states are registered with the SEC, there are only a few companies owned by some states but also by some municipalities such as Milan and Naples, but the owners are the respective entities and not the entities themselves. Who says this bullshit “all states are SEC registered corporations” o simili, meaning that states are private entities ,he simply proves that he does not even know how to read a certificate of incorporation.
The same Gavuglio, eventually he had to publicly acknowledge that the “ITALY REPUBLIC OF” registered with the SEC is a company owned by the Italian State, on the other hand, it doesn't take a genius, just do the translation of the name (“of the Republic of Italy”) and make a certificate of incorporation with the SEC, the owner is the Ministry of Economy and Finance.
How long will these hoaxes run? How many others will pay courses to be told these nonsense? How many others will believe in the hoax of individual self-determination and will ruin their lives induced by these self-styled legal experts ?
If you don't want to be fooled you have to study a lot, and be careful not to fall into the the Straw Man fallacy (cLICK).