The Veneto region can not’ represent the Venetian people without the Friuli-Venezia-Giulia region

in 1866 THE “Veneto” it was left to Italy, that in fact he found himself occupying it without the population being able to decide their own destiny. The Veneto was militarily occupied and sold even before the bogus plebiscite was staged. A plebiscite had to be made because it was due to the treaties, which, however, they spoke not only of the Veneto, but the Kingdom of Lombardy-Venetia.

Italy, on the other hand, denied Lombardy the dignity of the scam plebiscite, because it already occupied it militarily of the 1859 .

The Lombardy in fact was part together with the Veneto sovereign state Lombardo-Veneto, but in 1859 Lombardy was instead simply invaded in violation of that year's Zurich treaty, and it never even had the dignity of a bogus plebiscite.

This is why in 1866 for the international treaty had to vote all over the Lombardo-Veneto, not just Venetian.

Both cases of invasion (or military annexation) they were violations of international law, question that had been brought in the courts as early as 2006, already obtaining the historic sentence of “ABSOLUTE FAILURE OF JURISDICTION” of the State on the question of the annexation of Lombardy-Veneto. And for another, perhaps not coincidentally, the annexation of Lombardy-Veneto was canceled in 2010 and finally by 2013.

Now back to the question on schiarirci Venetian and look at a map to understand what we speak.

Map of Venice Euganea.

The Veneto invaded by Italy in 1866 it is what it was called until the 1950s “Venice Euganea” of which I photographed a map.

Italy, precisely to the Istrian and Dalmatian genocide 1945, He has retained the Austrian administrative division (which was in turn a division of the former Republic of Venice).

Italy kept the entity “Lombardy” which is actually a territory still today composed of the Lombard ethnic component (dating back to the Visconti) , and the Venetian populations of Bergamo, Brescia, Cream etc., (remained united in Venice at least Padua, Vicenza etc.).

Italy also maintained the Austrian administrative division of the Veneto, Simply called Venice-Euganea, integrated as was the Veneto coast of Grado and language Venetian Friulian.

Italy then also obtained the Venice from beyond the sea, namely the Istrian and Dalmatian coast ( also united with Venice for many centuries, even longer than Padua, Vicenza etc.) and he called it Venezia-Giulia.

Only with the end of the Second World War Venezia Giulia he was left at the Yugoslav Genocide, that is, Istria and Dalamatia were left to them, again without plebiscite or referendum in violation of the right of peoples.

Remember that “Venice Euganea” E “Venezia Giulia” are fancy names given by Fascism. But these territories are actually always historically united , even they were before the Roman Empire, and the whole land was called Venetia et Histria
( vedi http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regio_X_Venetia_et_Histria , wrong with the map)

We return at the end of World War II. To mask the unnatural loss of Istria and Dalmatia (because the Renaissance had great developments there too) Italy created the fictitious region of Friuli Venezia Giulia in 1953, a territory that today has to deal with those who pursue the international sovereignty of the Free State of Trieste recognized by an international treaty also violated by Italy.

Now the question becomes. So who are the Venetians ? Who is the Venetian people who have the right to self-determination?

THE QUESTION IS NOT’ OF LITTLE ACCOUNT, because as I have explained since 1997, THE “people Venetian” You have the right to self-determination, therefore he can override the Constitution and demand a new Venetian state for himself.

And this new Venetian state would be the idea that the “referendum” , which, however, they have badly misunderstood the question.

International law indeed, It provides for the right of self-determination and self-government of the people, so the people of Veneto “CAN HE” override the Constitution, but the question to ask is : THE “people Venetian” It exists only in the Veneto region ?

If we look at the ethnic and linguistic criterion, there is no reason not to consider the residents of Venice in the FVG region to be Venetian, just as there is no legal justification for denying Rovereto and other former Venetian territories to be recognized as Venetian minorities.

Since we spend, If these populations invoke their being Venetian, could obtain bilingualism and autonomy, including fiscal ones, as provided for by Law 302/1997, that national minorities recognizes strong “Human rights” . Instead the politicians do not understand anything, they do not know.

But back to the issue of the Venetian people, as mentioned above, the current Friuli VENEZIA Giulia region is a recent administrative construction of the Italian state, but historically it has always been Venetian since BEFORE THE ROMANS, she is Venetian by language, Culture, History. Stated in another manner, the internal administrative borders Italian, It does not define the outer boundary of the International Venetian people.

The Italian administrative border can define that the Venetians present there are not Venetians?

A historical example can explain it all. During the English colonization of’ India, the British had created many internal borders, small statites complete with a manned border. These boundaries prevented the normal passage of the populations, as still happens in Istria, for example. One day an Indian was about to cross the border and the English policeman asked the document.
The Indian asked why he needed the document. The Englishman said it was necessary to cross the border. The Indian said that that border had never been there before, and that he thought they had done it for the British.

E’ ended as we know, and we can safely consider the administrative border between Veneto, Friuli Venezia and a colonial border.

E’ a violation of the Venetian identity to give value to that border, a violation of international law that recognizes the Venetian people the right to self-determination !

If we look from a legal point of view, the people of Veneto have already existed as a state, the same referendum (and resolution 44/2012) and the Italian government pretend that in 1866 the annexation dealt with only “Veneto” .

So even those who erroneously concludes the people of Veneto in the Veneto region , It recognizes as the last historical and legal pass 1866. So once again the Venetian people who would be entitled to be made in new state,in international law, It would be at least not only that of the Veneto region, but also that of the Friuli Venezia Giulia region, ie the territory which had a plebiscite in 1866.

Who supports,as they do Morosin and lawyers Cantarutti, that the Veneto region represents the Venetian people, therefore makes a number of serious logical errors on historical and international legal, all errors already present in the resolution 42 of the 1998 and in the version worsened resolution 44 of the 2012 Veneto Regional Council.

Even if it was me in 1998 to explain to Morosin that the Venetian people have the right to “climb over” of the Italian Constitution, I don't feel guilty because he obviously understood “region” instead of “people”. Cantarutti seems not to understand too, and on the other hand they are criminal lawyers, no constitutional or internationalists. This is demonstrated by the fact that these issues were never brought into the process to Serenissimi.

The problem lies not only in the fact that someone wants to establish who the Venetians today, once again without consulting, in breach of its international law, its history, of its identity and logic.

On the level of the Italian national law , argue that the “Veneto region” represents the “people Venetian” it's a nonsense as a first-year law student, so much so that this concept was even declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court in 2007 .

It is enough to read the Italian Constitution to understand that the foreign function is reserved for the state, as is obvious. Therefore the region is a territorial entity without international independence, a peripheral institution of the State with “Autonomy” only in their own materials, among which there are no foreign relations. Certainly Italy is not a confederation of states, nor will it ever be, because it arises precisely from the military and illegal annexation of sovereign states by the Kingdom of Piedmont.

The Constitution provides for what a region does, what does, and when it has expertise in a certain subject . It is the exclusive competences, excluded and shared, and if it is foreseen that the foreigners belong to the state, so it is. Point.

E’ something so elementary that it is already studied in the first year of university, at the dawn.

But not enough, already Galan had tried in 2000 and then to step over this limit, coming systematically rap.
Then finally we tried the Region of Sardinia, who attempted, just this way, to make a “constituent of the Sardinian people”.

The government dragged her to the Constitutional court, which, while not excluding that the “Sardinian people” there, and even he is saying that the Sardinian people can not make a constituent, the Court ruled decisively that a body region can create and represent a constituent of placing people on a plane of international law. This I say since 1998, so much so that in 1999 Venetian people have made their constituent without passing through the region!

This principle applies even if the “Sardinian people”, because there the regional body could identify itself with the people as it includes their entire ethnic territory, but the Constitutional Court reiterated that the regional body cannot represent a people internationally, It would be a violation of the Constitution.

In short words , if the Venetian or Sardinian region azzardassero to declare a referendum, or to exercise international functions, Since it violates the Constitution, They would loose very easily and commissariate, with the applause of the population plagiarized by the cancellation of their history. I have already said, the limits, that there is the Government Commissioner to the Region.

Then to end the felt. 365-2007 of the constitutional court clarified that the representation of a people by a region of the Italian state is excluded.

So it is true that the people of Veneto have an INTERNATIONAL RIGHT TO INDEPENDENCE, but all the Venetian people have it, that ethnically goes from Bergamo to Udine.

Even legally, the last time the Venetian people were recognized as being made up of the territories of the current regions of Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia.

So self-determination and self-government cannot be done through the bodies of the Italian state, much less the only region Veneto.

Only the self-governing bodies created by the people themselves in Venetian 1999 ( see www.statoveneto.net) They can represent the people of Veneto internationally, except that an international treaty 1866 if anything, he spoke of Lombardo-Veneto.

If I repeat again that the people of Veneto have the right to decide and represent themselves, I stress that it will certainly not be an Italian or foreign bureaucrat who will determine the current border and the legal rights of the Venetians. Decide that today the Venetians of the FVG region are not Venetians, not only is it an ethnic suppression and a negation of history (just think that the first Doge was made in Grado) , but it is also a legal violation of the principle of self-government and self-determination that they refer to as the basis of the alleged referendum.

But also in terms of the right, if you want “call back” the Venetians to self-determination, then it must be done at least throughout the territory that theoretically decided the last time, ie in 1866, ie all the territory that today constitute the regions of Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia. Otherwise, Once again, it would decide on behalf of the Venetians themselves, violating international law.

therefore ? So the referendum whistle and tell them to stop doing Italians interests.

Read also Because I am fighting the referendum for the independence of Veneto