The Lorenzin Law could be declared null and non-existent because it was submitted late for Conversion

Update: the Constitutional Court in the hearing of 21 November 2017 about the law 119/2017, cd. “Lorenzin” He has rejected any participation of the subjects participating in the debate, The first was Venetian aggregation of which they are legal representative, But what is serious is that he also refused the scientific dossiers presented by us and by the associations, and the legal issues raised by us and others, he didn't even want to read them for mere knowledge. So the sentence produced by the Constitutional Court only concerned the issues raised by the Veneto Region in the appeal, which did not include the issue highlighted below, that is, the violation of the Constitution by the Government in not presenting the Decree-Law to the Chambers in time “Lorenzin” for conversion. the Constitution, just to not change, nothing even applies to the obligations of the government. We need to be afraid of this.

——————————————————————————–

THE 21 November 2017 The first hearing will take place in the Constitutional Court concerning the Legislative Decree. 73/2017 “Lorenzin”, but also the conversion law n ° 119/2017. ho already explained elsewhere that there will hardly be sentence that day, and that the Court will be more committed to deciding who can actually participate in the procedure compared to the numerous external intervenes.

We from Venetian aggregation we have some hope of being welcomed in the proceedings because we have the right to be there for an international treaty.

And if we come accepted we could also be the cause of the entire declaration of nullity of the L.N.119/2017. The reason is very simple the art. 77 of the Constitution says :

“When, In extraordinary cases of necessity and urgency, the government adopts, under his responsibility, provisional measures by force of law, the same day must present them for conversion to the Chambers that, even if dissolved, are specifically convened and meet within five days.“

Well, This did not happen, There was the late presentation of the decree law to the chambers for conversion, We at Venetian aggregation raised the problem of violation of art. 77 of the cost. , So the emanation and conversion in full would be affected.

Declaring the law decree and the conversion law because it is late because, The Court would close the game without having to discuss the issue of the vaccination obligation which is illegal and unconstitutional because in violation of the Convection Oviedo and of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights . Thus it would be avoided to defer the government, Parliament and who published this subversive human rights law.

The government would say that it has been a counterattack and that it will be reached from the end (but it will not be redone). Parliament would say that it is an innovative sentence and that they will pay attention in the future, Everyone would say that Italy is the homeland of the law, and the violation of the Constitution would be kept hidden from the population together with those who unmasked it. The story would continue with the new elections.

Patience for the numerous children who have died in the meantime looks at the house in connection with the vaccinations.