The Constitutional Court renunciation of Constitutional substance

THE Press release today of the Constitutional Court It made me think the black cloth on the tomb of Doge Marin Falier although perhaps nothing has to do with it.

Let's try to understand what happened.

The problem of vaccinations is a theme that includes many aspects:
1) the scientific aspect of their effectiveness and opportunity
2) the scientific aspect of their security or harmfulness
3) the appearance of the choice of which vaccinations to favor
4) The aspect of the concrete organization of the bodies in charge of vaccinating
5) The aspect of human and constitutional rights injured by possible imposition
6) The aspect of the compensation of the damaged vaccine
7) The aspect of possible corruption linked to the vaccinations business

The Constitutional Court was called by the Veneto Region to discuss the points 3 E 4, Since he contested Dl Lorenzin, and then the Law.

Then Venetian aggregation intervened which raised the aspects 2,5,7.

After a month they attended a number of associations that have covered and completed all the remaining aspects

THE 9 of November the Veneto Region approached the thesis of the associations asking that all the other issues raised by the other intervened were also evaluated at least, and he tried to make his point 5 even discrediting the vigilance system for vaccines,

The Court thus had on the table nourished scientific documentation, LEGAL, evidence of corruption and obvious cases of damaged, and a number of key questions to answer. And a great cry of alarm of the Veneto Region: the supervisory sistama not work.

What did the Court?

He declined to assess the aggregation Veneta topics (who he was entitled under an international treaty) and all other.
Refused to evaluate the latest issues added to the last by the Veneto Region, fregandose that are unknown realimente the damage caused by these dirty vaccines.

The Court answered only the questions asked by the Region regarding the point 3 E 4, which also included the consensus model, but not the illegality of the compulsory compared to community and international regulations.

In essence, the Court simply said “FOR NOW OKAY SO '”.

Practically, from today's press release, It understands that the Constitutional Court did not discuss the international human rights violated, especially those of the child, and even science of vaccination, Because the intervened had shown that the products currently administered as vaccines are dangerous for health to a much greater extent to the alleged benefits.

E, something very Gravem has not discussed the chaos and ineffectiveness of the vaccine regulatory system, already highlighted by the Report transmission and now also admitted by the Region, because even Venetian aggregation had asked the region the region on the region 16 September. The reality is that we do not know what we are actually getting with these vaccinations, AND MANY ARE REALLY DAMAGES ADVERSE, that result 10 times higher than anywhere else in Veneto, because only in Veneto is it obliged to report suspicious cases.

In doing so, the Court emptied the constitution of meaning and effectiveness, the Charter does not apply in fundamental rights, the right to health , the right of the child and other, simply NOTHING’ BROKEN STATE!

Unfortunately, it must be considered that just yesterday a judge appointed by Parliament was installed in the Constitutional Court, But this parliament has numerous unleashed members because they climbed on the bench through law of election declared unconstitutional, and FIVE judges are appointed by the President of the Republic, he former Constitutional Court judge, which was elected by this parliament full of not constitutionally elected, and that he does not dissolve.

It was an impartial and independent court? Unfortunately the lawyer. Moon told me it was not possible, for procedural reasons, ask for the exclusion of the judges appointed by Parliament full of not elected.

We are faced with the evidence that the constitutional card substantially does not apply, And this despite the citizens have confirmed the will to keep it as a formal act, Political and substantial basis, with less than a year ago referendum.

Evidently the vaccine global dominance has luck over these aspects of Justice, Human rights, laws and constitutions.

Dear citizen, you can still hope that international human rights bodies to put an end to this mess of your rights, But you have to wake up and look reality in the face: the Constitution is not worth anything in substance, even when it comes to health and school of small children. Needless to such glory of a Charter which leads to these results. If everything was formally correct, and I do not think, It would be the proof that it does not work in practice and in substance.

It starts to worry, Because it will be compulsory vaccinations will soon be easy, for a dictatorship, inocular just available in each the nanchips which is already certain can be made.

But do not despair, It is not over here, these judges have not had the courage of free men and umbilical independence with politics, they did not have the courage to open the judge of the laws to society and science as did the Venetian Republic already 700 Years ago. But we are free, and we will make the obligation cancel, and we teach them how to do it peacefully and through those laws that are not worth for them essentially crushed by quibbles unreasonable demands and unclean.

We declare that if you do not apply the Constitution and the human rights endorsed, In this case, we are subject to the domain of human rights that are illegally violating in substance and beyond the quibbles. Even those international.

After all, there is also crime against humanity.