The Oviedo Convention is useless ? not a chance, IT IS A FALSE TO PROTECT KILLING LAWS AND THE PARTIES THAT PROTECT THEM

The claim that the Oviedo Convention does not need anything IS FALSE and serves to confuse the other person to get him to do his own interests. here's the proof.

The European Court of Human Rights, Cause in Parrillo c. Italy (Application no. 46470/11), discussing embryos (a theme of the Convention and Protocols), He has referred several times to the Oviedo Convention, the Italian Government itself has not objected to the effectiveness of the Oviedo Convention as a law applied in Italy. https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/it/mg_1_20_1.page?contentId=SDU1192478

On the other hand that the Oviedo Convention applies in Italy it is demonstrated by several judgments of the higher courts (Supreme Court, constitutional court, State Council ) several judges and even of Ordinances of the Ministry of Health, as it is called in at least a Directive of the European Union. At the bottom of this article you will find a list of these acts. Is it possible that all these institutions use the convection of Oviedo inappropriately evident as saying that "the Oviedo Convention does not apply in Italy" is wrong and who says or does not understand anything or is in bad faith, He was also a "lawyer".

The ruling Parrillo c.Italia shows that at the European Court of Human Rights level (Court CEDU), you can discuss the violation of the Oviedo Convention asking that the state respects the.

Get to the Court ECHR to delete certain laws infamous and murderous ?

Unfortunately, in order to appeal to the Court ECHR you must first have done all grades of internal judgment of the country, it is Italy or France or another country that has signed. So getting there is not easy, it takes years and years, tens of thousands of euro, costanza, good lawyers, and especially the decision and determination.

Parrillo managed, but instead yet they have failed , and it is not even that we are trying, those who oppose the explant of illegal organs, as those who oppose illegal vaccines because it imposed.

So it is obvious that once the State, with the stamp of the President, He has implemented an illegal law because it violates the human rights (Rights such as those written in the Oviedo Convention), to enforce the human right must first request it, in all locations, And then, consistently, DETERMINATION, sufficient strength etc., with the years , get to the Court ECHR. It is done with great difficulty .

Not surprisingly, unconstitutional laws in violation of the Oviedo Convention have not yet arrived at the Court ECHR, justify the infamous law with the fact that no one is there yet is infamo or ignorant.

To say that the Oviedo Convention does not work because even in states that have ratified it is not respected is a way to confuse the other person and convince him not to ask these rights, because it is obvious that only after a law has been violated, or the rights of the Oviedo Convention have been violated, It must begin with the claim path that requires years. One wonders however why this has not been done before since the ratification of the Oviedo Convention is 2001.

Personally the first thing I did on the subject was, in 2017, its appeal for violation of the Oviedo Convention to the Constitutional Court, MA, as it is known, There have illegally ousted from the process, yet we had the right to the Framework Convention on National Minorities.

Why do some say that the Oviedo Convention does not apply or even worsen human rights? Simple: to hide the misdeeds of the parties that voted for certain murderous laws that actually carry out crimes against humanity . Let's see what more we talk.

The Oviedo Convention recognizes in Article 5 that the will of the person cannot be overridden in the therapeutic choice, under no circumstances: the individual always has the right to give consent to any intervention in the health field, and can even withdraw after giving. Moreover, the consent must be "free" and "informed", so if the patient provides information about the risks of "treatment" here is that the consent is extorted, illegal, It constitutes a constituent element of a crime.

There are exceptions to this setting, article 2 of the Convention states that there is a "primacy of the human being" why "The interest and the good of the human being must prevail over the sole interest of society or science.” .

So you can not bully the person physically or conceal information even for the collective good, so you can not, For example, impose a microchip at all for the fact that "makes us all safer", or impose transplant and transplants (I go back after) without consent.

But even when prescribing a painkiller or a vaccine should not hide the risks, even death, that these drugs have, and instead just will not do. Can you imagine the business of pharmaceutical companies what will happen when the Oviedo Convention is implemented ? I'll tell you, he will go to some other corrupt country to have anti-human laws made.

Yet, The "informed consent" of the Oviedo Convention does not substantially exceptions (I go back after) as rather have it the 32 of the Constitution or the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, therefore say that the Oviedo Convention "weakens" human rights, not only is nonsense, but it is false, diceo and who is ignorant or in bad faith and said to induce the other party in error. So much so that Article 27 It prohibits that the Convention is used to undermine the rights otherwise recognized by law.

Whatever you say the Oviedo Convention, Also it was the most wrong, L’art. 27 "Wider protection" , states that "None of the provisions of this Convention shall be construed as limiting or prejudicing the ability of either Party to grant more extensive protection with respect to the applications of biology and medicine than those provided for in this Convention.“. So far the Oviedo Convention can not undermine the rights of other laws.

On the issue of organ donation or tissue explants or organ article 19 of the Oviedo Convention prohibits any intervention without consent, and it requires that such consent "It must be given expressly and specifically, either in writing or before an official body. ".

The current law on organ harvesting was reversed by the Renzi government that took away the prior consent, and today we are all donors without being able to give consent. In Italy is therefore illegal on this point the law on organ transplants, and it applies a principle rejected by England, Holland and maybe France. We are short the stock of organs for the whole continent, as befits a country under usury banking. Sull'espianto The law does not require consent of the report with an official body is therefore contrary to the Oviedo Convention, It is dis-human in the sense contrary to human rights.

Someone says, dishonestly, the Oviedo Convention does not apply because dell'art.26.

This is false, art.26 ago because its very theoretical and abstract exceptions but the second paragraph of the totally confined and states that "the restrictions [ ..] They can not be placed on Articles 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20 E 21"So pretty much always: hardly find a case of lawful exception, the only case where you might be an exception, perhaps, It is to such a devastating epidemic to kill more than 50% of the population, certainly not for a case of death .

So who says that the Oviedo Convention may undermine human rights, or ignorant or in bad faith. For what purpose ? To protect from the exposure those parties who voted or preserved, once in office, of infamous laws, inhumane, who carry out crimes against humanity .

But there is more, and the other. He will tell soon.

Meanwhile, I ask all residents to sign Venetians network Proposition popular law filed in Veneto : we collect 7000 signatures by 15 DECEMBER , to bring in the courtroom that the region should, as his duty under the Constitution dall'art.117, implement the Oviedo Convention as part of Health which is a matter of its competence.

E’ our intention and we are working on the possibility of presenting a similar bill also in other Regions, we are looking for proposers which can supply all the work, The text of the law, and the electronic platform with which we are collecting signatures online, for the first time in Italy, under the new eIdas regulation.

Let's ask, to all, to write to various acquaintances or chat , residents in Veneto, signing online at www.repubblica.info/sottoscrizione.

On the site at the address www.repubblica.info It is not only the text of the bill “Salute”, but also two other denominated “banks” E “PEC” which we consider equally important for the protection of regional communities from financial predation and democratic rights. https://repubblica.info/moduli/

There are steering wheels for those who want to print them or send them https://repubblica.info/volantini/

I enclose some demonstrations that the Oviedo Convention is applied for decades in Italy, then, however, it has been systematically violated in some areas.

art. 32. Cost â € œ The Republic protects health as a fundamental right of the individual and as a collective interest , and guarantees free care to the indigent. No one can be forced to a specific medical treatment unless required by law. The law can not under any circumstances violate the limits imposed by respect for the human person. "

The Italian Constitution Article 32 provides for the law of the community as well as that of the individual, but in respect for human rights, and only the Oviedo Convention (Human rights) says that the rights of the individual are not compressible by society . Without the Oviedo Convention, the vaccination obligation is compatible with the Constitution.

The Oviedo Convention is operating Italian law , here are some demonstrations.

DIRECTIVE 2006/17 / EC of 8 February 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for the donation, the procurement and control of human tissues and cells (Text with EEA relevance) – oviedo cites the Convention as a normative reference .

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02006L0017-20121217

State Council of the Special Committee of the Gathering 18 luglio 2018 – Number 01991/2018 and date 31/07/2018 "Request of opinion regarding informed consent and advance treatment provisions" says "The European Convention of Bioethics 1997 (C.d. Oviedo), its part, all’art. 5 establishes: "An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the person concerned has given free and informed consent. This person shall beforehand be given appropriate information on the purpose and nature of the intervention and its consequences and its risks. The affected person may, at any time, freely withdraw consent”. http://www.trovanorme.salute.gov.it/norme/dettaglioAtto?id=65104

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS – GRAND CHAMBER, CAUSE Parrillo c. Italy (Application no. 46470/11) – judgment 27 August 2015 : In this ruling by the Council of Europe, Italian the applicant against the Italian Government, It has repeatedly called the Oviedo Convention as OPERATING IN ITALY https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/it/mg_1_20_1.page?contentId=SDU1192478

ORDER OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH 27 June 2001 effectiveness Extension Ordinance 5 March 1997 concerning the prohibition of cloning of human or animal practices. (published in the Official Gazette No.. 166 of the 19 luglio 2001) PUTTING THE OVIEDO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SOURCES OF LAW http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_normativa_137_allegato.pdf : THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER SIMILAR ORDERS EVEN AFTER

In the order of the Court of Cagliari 22 September 2007 , the judge noted that the pre-implantation diagnosis ban was introduced later by an act of secondary legislation, in particular the decree of the Ministry of Health n. 15165 of the 21 luglio 2004 (in particular the part which provides that "any investigation concerning the health of embryos created in vitro, according to the article 14, comma 5 [of Law. 40 of the 2004], it must be observational). It found that this was in contrast with the principle of legitimacy and with the â € œConvention of Oviedoâ € ?? of the Council of Europe.

THERE ARE MANY OTHER ORDERS AND JUDGMENTS WHERE THE CONVECTION IS CALLED IN AS A SOURCE OF OVIEDO OPERATIONS