The lie of resource scarcity: it's just will

Almost every day we hear in the media that say “natural resources are scarce”, that there is not enough food, oil and raw materials for the entire population of the world: We are already too many, they say.

And they are already at least 20 years which in particular argues that oil is running out, and that is not enough for a dignified tenor for everyone: In the future it will be necessary to extract it from the sands, and it will be even more expensive. For years, the scarcity of resources has also supported, again recently in Current TV.

But since in recent years they have been discovered huge deposits in South America and elsewhere, Now in the media it is increasingly heard that the shortage of oil is produced by the fogging of 2 Consumer billion people, especially Indians and Chinese. Anyway, that new fields are discovered less, as reaffirmed Al Gore.

Therefore for one reason or another it is always claimed that oil must be used sparingly, also for the greenhouse effect (In the meantime, it has been shown that it is not an anthropic but more natural climatic effect!, is not just a hoax): In short, the mantra says that the world cannot stand us all. To top, The alternative of hydrogen is proposed to oil, that in reality, come I demonstrated Years ago, It is not because hydrogen is produced consuming electricity for electrolysis, and electricity is produced mostly with oil.

Even the Italian WWF says “if everyone lived as we serve 2,8 planets”, and rejects Italy without appeal in terms of concrete actions. Supports the WWF that ours is a type of “unsustainable economic growth in rich countries with impacts on ecosystems that fall more directly on poor and vulnerable populations”

According to this perspective, the problem is not solved “Considering that in 2050 The global population will in probability in all probability 9 billion”. The need for greater reservations are professed, parks, etc.

These and other statements speak openly of the imminent and necessary scarcity in consumption, not only and not so much of a technological need attention in order to improve production processes, but just a backwards return, shortages, to scarcity.

I believe it is certainly necessary to think about how to reduce the environmental impact, about how to preserve the branch on which we sit (The environment that feeds us), but I do not share fundamentalist environmentalism, I am an environmentalist human wire, not of a nature without man.

I also agree that it is certainly necessary not to do anything definitively harmful and incurable, such as producing nuclear waste that nobody still knows how to manage and that however they are accumulating in places even at high risk with the hope that something to do with it will be found. Enormous costs that are not counted. Even in Germany, despite the careful management of the German, different territories were contaminated. Incredibly, however, the German green are converting to nuclear power, always on the basis of the idea of ​​the scarcity of oil and alternative energy.

We need to understand whether this perspective “Shortage” It is necessary and inevitable, or if only serve to legitimize the proposed reduction and birth control useful to someone. By now it is openly professed that the reduction of the world population will be a necessary evil to avoid the destruction of the system, Since there are only the alternative of imminent famines that are already fearing.

For example, Bill Gates recently let even be escaped that certain vaccination campaigns promoted by him have already contributed positively to the reduction of the world population (that is, they kill ?).

I have like the impression that, playing on the technological ignorance of the masses, We are implementing a project, and it serves not only to disguise speculative banking games (rising raw material), but ultimately it serves to implement a global project of domination, design of a very small group of people who want and in fact exercised dominion over the rest of the world population. conspiracy? Considering the history of the world, This is not a hypothesis but the general history of the world itself: almost always in the history of a few groups they have ruled against the will and against the people .

Once demonstrated that there is no scarcity of resources, and which instead is a propaganda tool for a descent project to dominate the world, It is shown that a genocide was made by that restricted group.

Certainly on the theory of the scarcity of natural resources in Italy he has already convinced himself more than one generation to pretend little or not to pretend completely, indeed to think of children as something too expensive and in the end the heavy burden to bear, as well as not important for individual happiness.

But if it were to prove true the theories that indicate a reduction of the population produced by vaccinations, then it would be a genocide already started several decades ago, And there would already be the first poisoned and weak generations of this crime against humanity

We can clearly demonstrate the existence of a long -term project, wanted by someone, that this kind ?

Meanwhile, however, we note that in Italy, for many years, right and left and above all the DC have concretely reduced the child support system, coming to induce the lowest birth rate of the world: As it was possible to achieve this in a period in which the country was among the richest in the world ? (It was actually an accounting makeup)

Which country tries to destroy itself by not renewing its population ?

And if Italy were almost an experimental laboratory, Just as the country of creation of the Croesus and celiachiaca epidemic ?

That is to maintain a constant population, require an average of children equal to 2,4 for family , But in Italy it has come to 1,3 !

The failure to provide the constant maintenance of the population demographic (thanks to the DC government and the fake opposition PCI ), then inevitably it opens the door to a necessary immigration, adapted to replenish the sterilized people, however piloted and low -cost immigration. It is a theft of births created by that political generation still in power. Who stole more than this.

in conclusion, More than dying Christian Democrats more than anything else, the Italians were not entirely born, and they have been replaced by low-cost immigrants.

It would seem that the real government of Italy , Aware that you can steal again and more on the shoulders of ignorant people, He wanted to replace us with those who are satisfied with a bowl of rice or sausages and beer of the hard discount.

But there was not only the “saving” on demographic policies, Italy has not even implemented those safeguard policies necessary for correct development, did not safeguard the environment, has not invested in public transport, instead encouraging the car, He proceeded to cut many other public services. In short, the only constant that you notice is that it was spared on the services to the citizen in order to continue to steal. And at the same time it has not been done in any way to make the state apparatus efficient which in fact is only a tank of votes to legitimize the system, to the detriment of 30% of the working population.

Despite these poor services, or absent, despite some state apparatuses would produce income, DC and PCI before, LEFT AND RIGHT after, they created one of the largest public debts in the world, So huge and already out of control that it will force the survivors and their children to constant precariousness for generations. We are already inside in this precarious perennial mechanism.

in conclusion, Nobody worried about the demographic collapse because the resources are scarce in nature, and since it is necessary to limit births,Never mind if a few are born “Italian”, Sometimes there are immigrants, blessed them. So we have to live indebted to force the future, they say.

For many years I too have believed the lies on the scarcity of resources.

But it is true or it is a premeditated theft implemented in order to force people to the government of a few?

In this site I found some time and reported that there are technologies that can solve some big problems, first the energy. For example, I reported the technologies which enable the recovery of energy from biomass, Also the recovery of sewage, as well I reported the energy produced by algae generating both biodiesel, both methane. But there are also other technologies, as to produce hydrogen with solar cells as Nocera proposed by MIT (I will talk about it), not to mention the simple and cheap geothermal.

There are many of these technologies and inventions that can solve problems even in the context of agriculture, but they are blocked, impedite, censored, even subject to state secrecy (He has revealed the monthly Nexus.it).

But what if they were used? Who would gain and who would lose in their social impact? Who currently holds the reins of the global regime so as to prevent in fact, or at least not to encourage and stimulate their use?

If we seek and find those who would lose from these new technologies, in fact we will find those who are hindering the development, indeed brakes the world and also a program of mass murder in the name of “Population reduction”.

Let's start with the understanding that if someone were able to announce a simple and inexpensive way to make electricity at home, and this method becomes widespread, each citizen would save a lot of money, for example, a northern Italian would save about 300 Euros a month for current spending, heating, cooling down, and transport, perhaps 150 to the south.

These savings would allow an increase of well-being, a more slender payment of mortgages, at the end in a short time a liberation from debt that many have towards banks and financial institutions.

But today's banking system is based on debt and speculation, not on the deducted investment for production purposes, and thus no debt means no customers! In short, the free energy would entail the collapse of the current banking system that holds in subjection, also controls the states, as taught MArco the Moon, the banks “possess” the states.

With a free energy system, Also businesses would free from unnecessary weight and cost, and with the money available would create new jobs and work, better use of the machinery, ricercherebbero best products, a general advancement of science. All this has always led to greater quality of life, and this to more individual freedom and justice.

but not only. On the level of food resources, a clean and cheap energy -made energy would also allow the creation of greenhouses to produce foods on site, agricultural products that could also produce in cold areas (as they do in Iceland with greenhouses) or in the desert, thanks to the energy produced in the desert and maybe transferred to the pole, eliminating material transport from one side to the other in the world in favor of energy flows.

Almost all states would come out of addiction and servitude to those who control oil resources. Ending the dispute for them almost all wars would be completely useless, purposeless, except religious ones that can be sufficiently reduced to reason.

in conclusion, with a source of energy at little cost the human race would flourish, And it would soon be released from many ideologies and many religious fictions that actually mask the wars that are for resources and ultimately for the domain.

In the new Renaissance there would be a further flowering of technology, which already arises spontaneously in society where there is a bit’ Free time. The human beings, peoples, think also being of himself and the neighbor's, As the Veneto shows which, in addition to being among the most productive in the world, is also among the most solidarity and altruists, It is also seen in the recent flood (do not be racist not to recognize this).

With new knowledge blooms, The human impact on the environment would be increasingly reduced, dematerializing things: Think already today what it is possible to do to make people work remotely from the home computer and nothing is done by continuing to circulate them by car (but if you do not circulate people would save a lot of money, THE 70% in excise duties - taxes - that the state must collect to pay the public debt, You DO NOT have to allow that says the state).

Freedoms connected to a new new free energy source would lead to a great reduction in international commercial exchanges because foods would be produced on site.

Here, Here's the rub. Today, unfortunately, all the raw materials, and those eating, and black gold, and yellow gold are exchanged and paid in one coin: the dollar of the USA.

The great reduction in the commercial intersconda would gradually affect a thinking of the value of the dollar (devaluation), which is only a piece of paper but today it is necessary for everyone to buy something in the global market, as anyone who prints them.

If the world exchange of products was very reduced to produce on site even in winter in greenhouses full of energy, the dollar would collapse, would become waste paper.

Who today has the power to print dollars, And to ensure its necessity, it also controls all the oil deposits that is listed in dollars, quickly lose power , that is, the ability to consume without producing in exchange for a valid banknote everywhere.

The Chinese now buy anything in the world, especially raw materials and industries, and almost everything outside the US, using the dollars they receive from the Americans in exchange for their products.

Also buy coffee, and expand the economy especially in Europe, They refrain from doing so in the United States that otherwise would stop being consumers of dollars printers.

As long as the game continues, They do not lose anything, and even the American secret government.

What government ? The world potentate based on the imposition of the dollar as a world money card.

Here then the same potentate brakes technological solutions in the energy sphere.

But a free energy technology not only for that potentate would be a serious threat and an unsolvable problem that would produce the collapse of the empire, USA today.

It would be a problem for the rest of the world, Nuclear devices and US weapons would end up at auction and probably in the wrong hands: We have already risked such a thing with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

But back to the real power, since it is the banks that regulate the monetary system, not governments, are few large private banks such as the Fed and the ECB to make the rules (the bank of the Chinese people for the moment is to play and it benefits) These are the same power groups that control these banks that oppose energy innovation in all ways.

Delay, the brake, The blockage in the development of energy technologies is therefore produced by a usurer project, a project that precisely by “debt”, the need, It draws its power, as long as it is a debt created fictitiously, as the debt of money, that can be solved when you want

This "status quo" to survive implies that oil is also scarce only for fake, you do believe , how money, that oil is scarce, When in reality the earth is full and even more it is full of methane, 10 times more than oil: There is no scarcity of resources.

Only the growth of the world population, creating real needs, can jeopardize this system. Only new powerful human masses such as nature can break the entire building built by this occult power that dominates the West and the whole world, the power that manages the debt.

This system is a reality, exists, as demonstrated by the fact that instead of punishing speculators who created the crisis 2007 They have further financed them with public money instead of giving it to scammed consumers, to businesses, to families. Only governments "owned" by the banks can do similar things against peoples who are believed (elections instead are fake, media plagiarism, falsified). This occult government is made up of a small group of people.

Presto, Working with a patient, these names will promptly identify, thanks to the availability of information on the various power systems, their plots, their personal relationships.

A non -infinite job that perhaps it is already possible to do today.

There are those who call this group Illuminati, chi in Bildeberg, who the Rosicrucians, and he sees in some organizations such as the WTO, the IMF the tools for the exercise of the power of these members.

There are those who trace this system to Freemasonry, those to the Papacy, who to Judaism, Even the Egyptians who, Aliens who Financo and race Anunnaki, those who we see evil and draft Lucifer himself.

But what is certain is that if you cannot unlock the situation in a soft and simple way, that is to democratize this power, or better to make it serviceable to the world and to the human race but today seeks to reduce, It will be necessary that before or after these gentlemen they will be repaid with their own coin, ie the controlled reduction of their population.

All in all there are two weights on the scale: better to reduce the population of a few billion people so rich that this group can continue to hold power, or rather reduce the population by eliminating this group of people, say at most 40.000 people ?

E’ a philosophical problem that has to do with justice, freedom, humanity, but that there is in place when we face the evidence that there are many energy alternatives to oil.

What is certain is that the assumption for which the world population must be reduced must be reviewed, because if there is an alternative, as it exists, L’ intangibility of the person (Human rights) It requires that even if it can speak and that instead we must think about how to "reduce" the number of those who slave the world and implement a programmed genocide.

I don't know if it is part of this project the fact that the bees are being reduced to the origin of 80% of the world pollination and therefore of food

Of course voluntarily it is implementing this practice, And doing it consciously is already a crime against humanity which in no way can be justified by the few pennies that earn the sale of the products that exterminate them.