The Venetians are compensated savers, Here because

The article 28 (applicable standards) del TUB (The Banking Act) dice :

2. Alle banche popolari e alle banche di credito cooperativo non si applicano i controlli sulle società cooperative attribuiti all’autorità governativa dal codice civile.

2-Tue. In the cooperative banks and cooperative banks the right to redeem shares in case of withdrawal, Also as a result of transformation, death or exclusion of a member, It is limited as provided by the Bank of Italy, as an exception to the law, laddove ciò sia necessario ad assicurare la computabilità delle azioni nel patrimonio di vigilanza di qualità primaria della banca. For the same purposes, the Bank of Italy may limit the right to reimbursement of other capital instruments issued

This was inserted by Comma. 1, comma 1, became. A), D.L. 24 January 2015, n. 3, convert, with amendments, From law 24 March 2015, n. 33, and subsequently replaced by Article. 1, comma 15, D.Lgs. 12 May 2015, n. 72.

Look at the house was included in the CBA before the Venetian bank crack.

La Costituzione invece dice “art. 47. The Republic encourages and safeguards savings in all its forms; discipline, coordinates and controls the provision of credit.”.

Mi pare evidente che facendo venire meno la tutela del risparmio l\’art.27 del TUB non può essere costituzionalmente legittimo .

How come it is inserted?

Qualcuno ha fatto ricorso per farne valere la incostituzionalità ?

E’ clear that the savers of popular and savings banks and cooperatives should be compensated in full because it was not speculators but investors. If the state does not provide the pact of alliance is dissolved .

Peccato che non c\’è mai stato una alleanza fra Italia e Veneti, but only exploitation and abuse of the former over the latter.

A