Elections unconstitutional by 2006: we have to stop them in bulk?
The Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional the election by 2006 on (sent.n.1/2014).
But then he thought of “to save” the rooms and “President” Republic of preserving the effects of these illegal acts and subversive, not only for the past, but also for the future. And these elected NOT naturally thought they stay glued to the chair.
The fact is that art.136 of the Constitution says that “When the Court declares the constitutional illegitimacy of a law
or enactment having the force of law, the law ceases to have effect from the day following the publication of the decision.”.
So it is obvious that “When the Court declares the constitutional illegitimacy of a law
or enactment having the force of law” happens that “the law ceases to have effect from the day following the publication of the decision” And it cannot be otherwise.
The Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional a provision instead and simultaneously has safeguarded the effects violating the constitutional principle . It is a fact subversive as that of illegal elections!
The Court ruled to rescue the effects of past elections, But not even this in the constitutional article in theory is possible, could save the effects not only unconstitutional a law made by a legitimate parliament, otherwise void and the Constitution useless.
In any case you can not keep the effects of a law unconstitutional in the future, And not even the Court has given eternal validity to this parliament, otherwise the declaration of unconstitutionality no longer makes sense.
The reality, however, is far worse: two judges out of three of this Constitutional Court are political (as Amato) nominated by parliaments illegal and unconstitutional, And if they had respected the Constitution and art.136 would have had to declare simultaneously with the sentence that they were appointed by an illegitimate parliament.
Certainly therefore the same sentence is not a sentence, because the Court itself is not a legitimate court, because the effects of the sentence are precisely that “the law ceases to have effect from the day following the publication of the decision”.
The ruling of the Constitutional Court safeguarding the effects of an unconstitutional law violated for the future and for the past, openly violates art.136 of the Constitution and subverted the very principle of the pre -eminence of the Constitution on the ordinary electoral law,.
as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects : international standards recognize the people the right to free elections, In particular, art.3 protocol 1 the ECHR (Another called for by the same judgment !) and the analogue art.25 of “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” UN source.
L’art.10 Cost. states that “The Italian legal system conforms to the rules of generally recognized international law”.
The Court not sentenced to the immediate return to the polls, therefore subverted the constitutional principle that the rated international laws prevail over the internal system , which was also recognized by a judgment of the Constitutional Court as per the judgments of the Court of Cassation.
How I have allowed these illegal constitutional judges “suspend” the right to elections, and leave “suspended” without imposing an immediate dissolution of? It may well happen that the President of the Republic and the Senate die and that therefore no one is legally the head of state ? So what would happen? Because the Court cannot declare the dissolution of the chambers? Nothing prevents !
Someone has to do it right away.
I'm 6 months I expect that some lawyer or constitutional expert will shed light aspect of this unconstitutional judgment of 1 2014, and requesting the dissolution of which in fact are not elected constitutionally.
The nullity of the future effects of the unconstitutional law prescribed by art.136 of the cost. makes a huge and substantial difference on the current structure.
First, since the elections do not legitimize this parliament since the day of the sentence, It is not a parliament, elected with majority of the premium not really exist, and they are about 200 PD MPs to the House for “prize” illegal, and therefore it follows that the government does not even have a political majority, The parliament overall is illegitimate (He says well the sentence).
We are facing a private association subversive usurping institutions, exactly as I reported in 1996, even those were unconstitutional elections.
the Constitutional Court ( Also it mostly made up of members “politicians” appointed by usurpers) saved herself and the usurper by violating the Constitution, but not worth a damn: Parliament is not legitimate as the Constitution says.
Leaving this political mafia time to adjust things is equally criminal, they can stay there for others 4 years and convenient to delete all constitutional constraints making an apparently legal coup. I may as well autoassolversi (as they always have done and are doing) and then it all ends in nothing.
Absolve themselves what ? From the usurpation of political powers which is a serious crime against the state.
Government and Parliament and President of the Republic are not legitimate in the light of art.136 of the Constitution., They are usurping the powers, It is a long time ago with the usurpation of the citizens' free voting rights, and since they are not legally MPs, they have no immunity, They may be arrested, indeed they must be declared under arrest by the police because’ TYPE OF CRIME REQUIRES THE.
Rather, E’ RIGHT OF EACH DUTY TO MAKE THE DECLARATION OF ARREST
Because those of the 9 DECEMBER ? Because the movement does not declare it and does not make it 5 stars or other parties?
Simple: or do not have sufficient preparation , or do not want. For Movement 5 Stars it is clear that they know very well the seriousness of the situation, I have also stated, but obviously they prefer to work with this regime pretending to give him opposition, as they always have the right and the left, actually always agree.
Unfortunately these usurper gentlemen will not arrest anyone, as evidenced by my complaints since 1996: The judiciary is controlled as a body by political Freemasonry that has been guided Italy since its inception, who created it by destroying the freedoms of the peoples of Italy.
That the judiciary has a political role, Not the entire body of the judiciary, but the apex of the judiciary, is demonstrated not only by the sentence of the Constitutional Court, but also from my complaint lodged to the Court of Auditors in February, as my other various complaints from the 1995.
Unfortunately this political mafia ganglia that reach up to EU summits , Rather, Today the EU is represented by the Italian President, And everyone is silent about this non -legality of Italy in violation of European treaties.
All of this, the usurpation complaint etc., has already been done in 1996 and the following years. Then I was shown that Scalfaro was jointly responsible and associated subversive to this mafia …… NOT NOTHING HAPPENED. Rather, They denounced for offenses against the President of the Institution , but an appeal made by me and signed by Scalfaro showed that my statements were true, And so everything was covered by the “Minister” Flick (Today it is in the Constitutional Court ?). And nothing said the PM time , Carlo Nordio, maybe muted by promises to guide “reform” the judicial system, that it never occurred .
All this shows that the Constitution does not actually exist, NOT USED TO NOTHING ,E ‘ ONLY A PICTURE of a regime that in the name of your “Well” It makes their pigs comfortable.
We need to understand and know these facts, or it is not clear that enemy has to do, And if you don't know it, you cannot win and win this liberation war.
Here is the dossier that shows that Italy is an eternal return to systematic “coups” http://italia.8m.com/salva
Six months have passed since the publication of the judgment, and there were 6 months of debate and study by all major jurists.
I seem to be able to affirm that no one has denounced the illegality of the judgment of the Constitutional Court when it tries to save and the effects of the unconstitutional elections.
I believe this is due to a political ruling, Because those who realize that Italy has died irreconmersably do not want to admit it by understanding that it will never be reborn again. But when one thing died …….
Sincerely, It is right that Italy units disappears and only the memory of a corrupt and murderous aggregation of politicians and criminal bankers remains.. E’ the story that I decided, and the regime has also suicide legally. Democratic Italy perhaps never even born, It certainly was not born with the referendum of 1946.
You can also see a video explanation
paron
18 May 2015 @ 11:20
Hello Marco. Sure you can, but it would be absolutely useless. In fact I did it for years, uselessly, starting with the 1996, you see the coup dossier . Catching up on complaints , assuming you can find a judge willing to go against the regime, and a lawyer to exposing themselves to professional retaliation, cause only a autoassolvimento action of the regime through decriminalization, the statute of limitations reductions, or generalized amnesties with release also addicts, drug dealers, pedophilia, scammers etc.. On the other hand there are few but different magistrates who tried us, and the system has purged them. See for example the report pointed at the court of auditors. The regime is in Raltã controlled by the owners of the debt, usurers, that hold in bondage the country that they themselves have created, Read my pages on the history of Italy to find out. Of course they take care to make you believe you are in a democracy and in a state of law, which is absolutely false. Your proposal departs from still believe in this illusion, I had up to about 12 Years ago. The only action we can really hope to achieve is the “reset” of the system with the cancellation of the units of Italy, PUBLIC DEBT, and the return to the pre-unification states. Write me if you are interested.
Marco
11 January 2015 @ 20:20
hello Loris but you can not’ make a committee and with the help of a good lawyer to report and undertake legal routes against these people?