from the 2012 the Veneto people can no longer make new self-determination, only that of the 1999.
The recognition of constitutional status of the right to “Self-Government of the Venetian People” given by Article 2 of Law n.340 / 1971, combined with the right of self-determination of peoples given by the Italian ratification of “International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights” which took place with law 881/1977, legally allowed the self-determination of the Venetian people (and not citizens of the Veneto Region) which although possible since 1977 it happened successfully only in 1999.You can see the historical site of that self-determination by clicking here , while the Venetian national institutions that developed from those acts are found today on www.statoveneto.net.
As is well specified and evident on the site, the Self-government of the Veneto People was born as a legal exercise of international civil and political rights recognized by the Italian Republic through the ratification law n.881/1977 of the right of peoples to do so. At the time, the illegality of the annexation had not yet been demonstrated 1866, and therefore the status of colonial territory of Lombardy-Veneto, but in any case the law allowed the self-determination of new institutions, also with the endorsement of the Constitution which adapts to the international system through ratifications. This gave birth to a new body initially part of the Italian Republic, it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law, but not subject to the Italian State just as the Municipalities of Livigno and Campione were not subject to it, which in fact did not pay VAT to the Italian State. In fact, the Constitution also speaks of the indivisibility of the Republic, but not of the Italian State. In the International Covenant there is an obligation for the signatories, in this case the Italian Republic, to encourage and promote self-determination, possibly eliminating criminal or other provisions that prevented it.
The Self-Government of the Venetian People in 2000 requested the immediate transfer of powers pursuant to the “DCP International Pact” (L.n.881/1977) art. 1.3 e art. 2.1 , something that the State has not complied with by violating its international duty given by Article 2.1 of the Covenant, but nevertheless by doing so the State has re-created the conditions of international illegality of its presence due to the denial of human rights , something that also justified the subsequent steps of Self-Government. in 2002 Veneto national elections were held, that is, the first elections of the national parliament of the Venetian people in Italy (from Bergamo to Udine) which was voted on, like all national parliaments, only by the citizens of that nation, that is, by those registered in the registry. The elections were also publicized by some Italian media, thus creating the public notification necessary to give legal legitimacy and also national political value to the election of the new parliament in Veneto: with the publication of newspaper articles and television reports, including the TGR Veneto, Anyone who had the legal right to vote by declaring themselves in the Venetian national registry office was notified of the election. In any case it was all published in the newspaper of the Venetian laws, the official online site.
With the constitution and electoral legitimation of the Self-Government of the Veneto People we were faced with the substantial modification of the territory of the State (but then again, not of the Republic) therefore the elections were duly denounced by the judiciary itself and the complaint originating from Bergamo was sent for territorial jurisdiction to Padua where the headquarters of the Self-Government was located. The crime charged was “attack on the State Constitution”, a life imprisonment crime which had never before been attributed to a group of independence activists, even though we were completely devoid of any armament.
As is known, the judiciary has a constitutional obligation to prosecute crimes, but given that what we had done was the exercise of civil and political rights provided by law, after two years the GIP, Bruno Cherchi, then Italian prosecutor of Venice and Vicenza, he had to recognize that it was all legal and therefore in 2004 he asked for it to be archived, which occurred. Even in the absence of a sentence, this dismissal demonstrated the perfect legality of the constitution and exercise of the Self-Government of the Veneto People, of the Venetian elections, Why, we repeat, the judiciary has the obligation to prosecute crimes against the State.
The repression of the occupying Italian state, however, had in the meantime made itself felt differently, in 2002 the Carabinieri beat up Loris Palmerini and Massimo Lando and reported them as if they had attacked them. However, the beating took place in the presence of numerous witnesses, so in this case too no trial took place because they were innocent..
The combined provisions of Article 2.L.n340 /1971 with L.n.881/1977 it allowed the legal self-determination of Self-Governing Institutions of the Veneto People in compliance with ratified Italian internal and international law, but in 2005-2006 I found out (L.Palmerini) the illegality of the annexation of 1866 which in reality concerned the entire Kingdom of Lombardy-Veneto and also the nullity of the Monarchy-Republic Referendum of 1946.
Since in 2006 an Italian proposal to the UN wanted to declare that all the self-determinations of the people of the Earth had taken place, and in light of the total illegality of the Italian Republic, the Institutions of Self-Government of the Veneto People in 2006 they also declared the Succession to the Kingdom of Lombardy-Veneto on the date of 1859 and violation of the Treaty of Vienna 3 October 1866 which provided for the vote of the entire Kingdom as per the administrative territory, i.e. including Lombardy. It is necessary to remember that Lombardy-Veneto was born in 1816 as the unification of the Ducato of Milan and Mantua to the Duchy of Veneto, or otherwise said, the Republic of Venice, invaded and subdued by Napoleon in 1797, and then ceded to the Habsburgs (as international law permitted at the time), in 1816 the Duchies of Milan and Mantua were merged with him (which came to an end) while the Venetian State continued its jurisdiction under the name of Lombardy-Veneto but always with Venice as the political and legal capital of the entire territory.
We are aware of and respectful of the human rights of the individual national and linguistic communities of Lombardy-Veneto, so in 2012 we have reformed Lombardy-Veneto to restore the ancient administrations of the peoples of Insubria and Mantua, also providing for their right to return to international self-government once they have all returned to sovereign status as Lombardy-Veneto, before it is not possible.
Then the Veneto National Parliament (called the Assembly of Members) www.statoveneto.net He currently also acts as a substitute for the federal parliament of Lombardy-Veneto, and so for the institutions of justice.
But thanks to Palmerini's studies in 2006 the request to ascertain Italy's non-sovereignty over the territory was presented to the Ordinary Judge of Venice, It is in the 2008 the sentence declared the “ABSOLUTE FAILURE OF JURISDICTION” on the issue, which does not mean that sovereignty has been recognized as some fraudulent clones of the institutions have claimed, but instead that no Italian judge can deal with the issue because it is delegated to the international judge.
in 2008 we then presented an appeal to the Council of Europe to obtain recognition of our right to have a natural judge from Veneto and the nature of “puppet government” of Italian administrations. In front of 25 appellants each on their own strangely the Council of Europe recognized Daniele Quaglia di S.Vendemiano as the leader and sole representative, who was also voted to become head of government to replace Luciano Franceschi. Unfortunately, while awaiting trial, Daniele Quaglia had the classic power intoxication that comes from those who find themselves in roles of power and responsibility without being prepared or capable of it. ( or he did it on purpose , I don't know today), and so these together with the Minister of the Interior he chose Sergio Bortotto (former policeman) and to the friend of this one, Galina, Cornuda police chief, they began to talk about weapons and armaments, and without having authorization and without an established law they began to take action looking for uniforms, insignia and who knows what else. And so, while these created the conditions to force the intervention of the judiciary against an alleged armed organization, Quaglia did not pursue the appeal to the Council of Europe, he dropped it. By now we would already have the Venetian judges! The investigations instead saw the seizure of the weapons of the Cornuda police (ah, ah) but then everything was recognized as legal and it was demonstrated that it was not self-government that had sought armed sedition. However, the path to the Council of Europe was lost, and today the channels to get there have been legally closed.
For these and other reasons, the Assembly dismissed the entire Quaglia government and several parliamentarians, and then these months later they also attempted to usurp the institutions in a very specific conflict strategy openly armed against the Italian State. According to the newspapers, they even planned to kidnap Luca Zaia, man who faithfully serves the Italian State and globalism. In vain we asked the media and journalists to clarify the fact that they did not belong to the Self-Government of the Veneto People, we hadn't seen them for months, they were legally clones like others, and now we don't center, but nothing was achieved.
However, the appeal to the Council of Europe almost certainly gave way to the Italian cancellation of the annexation of 1866, act required by law n.881/1977. Thus L.n.212 del 2010 canceled the annexation as of January 1st 2013, date by which Italy could cancel the cancellation of the annexation, that is, reinstate the law, but obviously he could not do it under international law and in any case the annexation would still have remained illegal as it has always been.
Even today in 2022 we of the Self-government of the Venetian people have nothing to do with the various movements that speak of armed liberation war or liberation movements or committees in a state of war, and me, Loris Palmerini, Instead, I have always insisted that all peaceful and legal ways be tried to return to sovereignty, and so we are still doing .
For international law, the non-recognition of the self-determination of 1999 it is a crime against a people. Even if made by people of the same people.
Since sovereignty was legally acquired in 1999, all alleged other possible self-determinations of the Venetian people which occurred after that of 1999 they are illegal internationally because of what international law says.
Put another way, those who claim the representation of the Venetian people outside the institutions of self-government, they commit an international crime and also a crime of subversion under the penal code of self-government, and one day they will answer for it if they are not pardoned.
But it must be highlighted that even under Italian law the self-determination of the Venetian people has no longer been legal since 2012 and therefore constitute a life imprisonment crime of attack on the Constitution.
It is certainly not a coincidence, in fact that with the Statutory regional law n. 1 of the 17 April 2012 The point is that all these movements each claim to be legitimized to act in the name and on behalf of the entire Veneto population the previous state and constitutional law n. 340 of the 1971 it was replaced with a regional law, because while the previous Statute approved with L. n. 340 of the 1971 it was a law issued by the Italian parliament in double reading and therefore having the value of constitutional law, the statute of 2012 it is a law of regional origin / devoid of international authority and therefore does not legitimize acts of international importance . We are therefore talking about the hierarchy of sources and those who follow groups like CLNV or MLNV or Venetkens would do well to consult a lawyer because simple participation in the association constitutes a crime for Italy.
It should be noted that only after the change of laws of the 2012 they saw each other “emulate” or self-determination clones of 1999, which are therefore all illegal and criminally punishable by the Italian State, but also from the Veneto and Lombardy-Veneto states.
In summary and repeated: in short, any self-determination is no longer possible and no longer legal since 2012 because the Veneto regional law n.1 of 2012 it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law , it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law, it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law.
it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law, while "the self-government of the Venetian people" referred to in Article 2 of Law No. 340/1971 allowed and implied self-determination based on Law No. 881/1977, "the self-government of the Venetian people" referred to in art.2 L.r.n.1/2012 implies only regional autonomy as provided for by the Constitution and therefore within the limits of this, so in reality practically no de facto autonomy and no international autonomy. to try again, in the new states it is stated that the Veneto People are part of the Region, which is internationally ridiculous and illegal because we exist like Lombardy-Veneto invaded and occupied by a state that doesn't even know for sure whether it is a republic or a monarchy.
If the laws that make any self-determination of the Venetian people illegal from 2012 make self-determined institutions uniquely and exclusively valid in the 1999, however, there is the fact that currently none of the competent international bodies have recognized any Venetian authority, and it must be highlighted that those that are told by the movements that say they have been recognized by the UN are lies, and this alone should make the reader understand the stuff or nature of which they are made and that it is better to avoid them completely.
MLNV , CLNV 1 E 2 (3?) o Venetkens (spin-off CLNV2) they declare themselves "Authority representing a people" but they are not, they say they turned to the UN and were recognized by them, but as proof they show only one application filing stamp. In short, they pass off a postmark as an acknowledgment, In short, they pass off a postmark as an acknowledgment.
Furthermore, some have fallen for the hoax of individual self-determination and have thus brought many people into economic and legal trouble.. Have someone introduce you who has successfully not paid their car tax for over 6 years and you will see that they will not present you with anyone or false papers, because i passed 5 years everything comes to pay.
Even from these lies we understand the smallness of these movements .
Upon closer inspection, however, we notice movements that are good at deceiving people and defrauding money
There are other movements that declare sovereignty over the Veneto territory, but upon closer inspection they all lack the legal basis to claim such sovereignty in the International Court of Justice and in the world, in particular those that refer to the Venetian Republic, because in the 1797 there was only the right of the strongest, and even without a resolution from the Maggior Consiglio the Republic of Venice was unfortunately conquered by the Napoleonic hordes, which fortunately has not terminated the jurisdiction, then renamed “Lombardo-Veneto” in 1816 .
Furthermore, note that there never existed “Venetian Republic” but always and only there “Republic of Venice”.
Therefore the Lombardo-Veneto and the Veneto people are sovereign and legally independent, but militarily illegally occupied by Italy, and their sovereignty is in the hands of the institutions of the Veneto people established in 1999, only in these, and they will remain there until a referendum can be held in full self-government as required by the Treaty of Vienna of 3 October 1866. Everything else is rubbish.
In the meantime I trust that these movements will be destroyed by their own troubles, as some convictions have already demonstrated. return sovereigns, but only when the Venetian people and the citizens of Lombardy-Veneto have clarified and understood what their true institutions are. In the meantime they will remain de facto governed by the Italians or some other occupier.
Telegram channel to stay informed https://t.me/sovranita_autodeterminazione_z
