The recognition of constitutional status of the right to “Self-Government of the Venetian People” given by Article 2 of Law n.340 / 1971, combined with the right of self-determination of peoples given by the Italian ratification of “International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights” which took place with law 881/1977, legally allowed the self-determination of the Venetian people (and not citizens of the Veneto Region) which happened in 1999, whose historical site is located here https://www.repubblica.org/governo/veneto/index_sav.htm, while the Venetian national institutions that have developed from those acts are on top www.statoveneto.net
As is well specified and evident on the site, The Self-Government of the Veneto People was born as a legal exercise of civil and political rights within the Italian Republic, creating a new body of the Italian Republic , it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law, part of the Republic but not subject to the Italian State as were the Municipalities of Livigno and Campione which in fact did not pay VAT to the Italian State. In fact, the Constitution also speaks of the indivisibility of the Republic, not of the Italian State.
The self-government of the Veneto people has suffered (2000) requested the transfer of powers pursuant to “DCP International Pact” (L.n.881/1977) art. 1.3 e art. 2.1 , something that the State has not complied with by violating its international duty given by Article 2.1 of the Covenant, but nevertheless by doing so he re-created the conditions of international illegality of his presence for denial of human rights and justifying the next steps. In 2002 Veneto national elections were held, ie elections to the national parliament of the Venetian people in Italy (from Bergamo to Udine) which is voted on, like all national parliaments, only by the citizens of that nation. The elections were also publicized by some media, so much so as to make the election legitimate as anyone who had the right could vote. The elections were denounced by the Bergamo judiciary, who sent the investigation to Padua, which after two years recognized the legality of the exercise of rights (because required by law) and filed in the 2004 (GIP Bruno Cherchi, today the Italian prosecutor of Venice).
The repression of the Italian state has reached the point of having Loris Palmerini and Massimo Lando beaten up by the Carabinieri, but given the numerous presence of witnesses, no beating took place. A few months later, the G8 in Genoa took place.
The combined provisions of Article 2.L.n340 /1971 with Law 881/1977 it allowed the legal self-determination of self-governing institutions of the Veneto people in accordance with domestic and international law, but in 2005-2006 I found out (L.Palmerini) the illegality of the annexation of the entire Lombardy-Veneto region of 1866 and also the nullity of the Monarchy-Republic Referendum of 1946, so in 2006 the Institutions of Self-government of the Venetian People have declared the succession to the Lombardy-Veneto region, as the political capital of the Lombardy-Venetia state was Venice , and moreover the Lombardo-Veneto was born in 1816 as the unification of the Ducato of Milan and Mantua to the Duchy of Veneto. Nonetheless, the Statutes of Self-Government have been reformed to guarantee the human rights of the individual national and linguistic communities of Lombardy-Venetia. Therefore, today there is a Veneto National Parliament (called the Assembly of Members) www.statoveneto.net) which also acts as a substitute for the federal parliament of Lombardy-Venetia, and so for the institutions of justice.
Following an appeal in 2006 to the Ordinary Judge of Venice and sentence in 2008 , there was the declaration of absolute defect of Jurisdiction over the Lombardy-Venetia by Italy. We have filed an appeal with the Council of Europe to obtain the natural judge, and this led to the cancellation of the Italian annexation, the L.n.212 of the 2010 (it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law) canceled the annexation. Unfortunately, the appeal to the Council of Europe was dropped by Daniele Quaglia who was then dismissed by the Assembly and who was seen months later attempting the usurpation of the institutions in a very specific strategy of openly armed conflict against the Italian State.
I, Loris Palmerini, Instead, I have always insisted that all peaceful and legal ways be tried to return to sovereignty, and so we are still doing today in 2022.
For international law, the non-recognition of the self-determination of 1999 it is a crime against a people. Even if made by people of the same people.
Therefore, in any case, all possible self-determination of the Venetian people occurred after that of 1999, but it should be noted that even for the Italian law they are no longer possible since 2012. In fact with the Statutory regional law n. 1 of the 17 April 2012 The point is that all these movements each claim to be legitimized to act in the name and on behalf of the entire Veneto population the previous statute deriving from law no. 340 of the 1971, but while the statute of 2012 it is a law of regional source / without international authority), the previous Statute approved with L. n. 340 of the 1971 it was a law issued by the Italian parliament in double reading and therefore having the value of constitutional law. We are therefore talking about the hierarchy of sources.
It should be noted that only after the change of laws of the 2012 they saw each other “emulate” or self-determination clones of 1999, which are therefore all illegal and criminally punishable by the Italian State, but also from the Veneto and Lombardy-Veneto states.
In short, any self-determination is no longer possible or would be more legal since 2012 because the law 1 of the 2012 it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law , it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law, it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law.
it was a double reading issued by parliament and therefore having the value of constitutional law, while "the self-government of the Venetian people" referred to in Article 2 of Law No. 340/1971 allowed and implied self-determination based on Law No. 881/1977, "The self-government of the Venetian people" referred to in Article 2 of Law No. 1/2012 implies only regional autonomy as provided for by the Constitution, pursuant to Article 2 of Law no.340 / 1971 allowed and implied self-determination on the basis of Law no.881 / 1977. In fact, it is stated in this new Statute that the Veneto people are part of the Region, which is internationally ridiculous and illegal.
Beyond the purely legal reasons that make it illegal since 2012 pursuant to Article 2 of Law no.340 / 1971 allowed and implied self-determination on the basis of Law no.881 / 1977 1999, there is also the fact that in reality none of the competent international organizations has recognized any authority to date, the movements that say they have been recognized are lies, this already should make us understand the pasta or nature of which they are made.
MLNV , CLNV 1 E 2 o Venetkens declare themselves "Authority representing a people", they say they have not even addressed the UN and have been recognized, but as proof they show only one application filing stamp. In short, they pass off a postmark as an acknowledgment, In short, they pass off a postmark as an acknowledgment, In short, they pass off a postmark as an acknowledgment .
There are other movements that declare sovereignty over the Veneto territory, but on closer inspection they all lack the legal basis for claiming such sovereignty in the International Court of Justice, in particular those that refer to the Republic of Venice, because in the 1797 there was only the right of the strongest, and even without a resolution of the Maggior Consiglio, the Republic was unfortunately conquered by the Napoleonic hordes, which fortunately has not terminated the jurisdiction, then renamed “Lombardo-Veneto” in 1816 .
Therefore the Lombardo-Veneto and the Veneto people are sovereign and legally independent, but militarily illegally occupied by Italy, but the sovereignty is only in the hands of the institutions of the Veneto people established in 1999, and they will remain there until a referendum can be held in full self-government as required by the Treaty of Vienna of 3 October 1866.
Telegram channel to stay informed https://t.me/parlamento_veneto