Self-determination and territorial integrity in a single path.

in 1997 I began to spread an idea: there is no constraint of the uniqueness of the Italian Republic.

In fact, the right of self-determination of the international source, Self-determination and territorial integrity in a single path. This right is enshrined in various international laws, the first was the “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”, He entered as due under Italian law with the law n.881 of 1977. A due fact because the Constitution to the articles 2 E 10 fans so that these human rights laws and international become active within the Italian system forcibly. On the other hand, Italy lost the war and was never a sovereign state al 100%.

Up to here there's also the “referendum”, which indeed clamor the right of consultation with the people of Veneto, which today has become clear is prohibited by the Regional Statute. So now they are ranting against denying even the freedom of a referendum.

The less stupid each other, or the smartest, or those who have found themselves forced to reinvent itself in the struggle of caregiver, they understood this fact irreversible, and are organizing a virtual consultation (which means even non-existent).

Self-determination and territorial integrity in a single path: it is a right that only the peoples have, Self-determination and territorial integrity in a single path, let alone a party.

for example, Self-determination and territorial integrity in a single path, but for sure there is the right of the Province of Bolzano, institution of the Italian state, that implement means to detach. That is, it must be the people who make the self-determination, and not elected by the Italian rules. And then who should vote in a referendum of the South Tyrolean if not the only South Tyrolean ?

Now it happens that the people of Veneto is recognized as a constitutional law (n.340/1971), and that at the time the law passed the law had a constitutional value as approved in two readings by the Italian parliament. If there was no legal recognition, the self-determination of the Venetian people would be a pure utopia or the road to war. Needless to mention, for example, the people of Lombard, as there is no legal recognition nor even unity of the people in the territory.

The question becomes : who are the Venetian people? where the people of Veneto? What language do they speak Venetian people?

In the international sense of the peoples are distinguished by language, History, Culture, legal history, certainly not to be ruled temporarily, or by Galan Zaia or other.

Here the legal representatives no longer get there, or do not want, not even those of the virtual referendum.

Confusing the people of Veneto with the residents of the Veneto region is for beginners in the law, I would say that it is evident that those who say it do not really know who the Venetians are and do not know their history and language. The proof is the very existence of the Friuli VENEZIA Giulia region, without even recall the history of the Serenissima.

If not enough, Also the Supreme Court in 2011 He told us that residents of the Veneto are not the people of Veneto.
If not enough, Also, the Constitutional Court in 2007 he told Sardinia that a regional body cannot represent a people in an international sense. And Sardinia is also a region with a special statute!

therefore ? A recognized people may or may not become independent in the Italian system?

As long as a people is recognized holiday, the self-determination of the Venetian people would be a pure utopia or the road to war, the self-determination of the Venetian people would be a pure utopia or the road to war 1997, starting to get into it in 1999 the self-determination of the Venetian people would be a pure utopia or the road to war .

the self-determination of the Venetian people would be a pure utopia or the road to war, if there is no power that supports you or the popular following is missing, it clashes with the right to integrity of a state. namely, as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects, as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects, no one intervenes, and stalls.

as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects, as self-determination of the people recognized, as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects, and legal institutions are representative, the self-determination of the Venetian people would be a pure utopia or the road to war. as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects, otherwise then also their colonized peoples open the road and is free.

You will come to a stall to which they are also intended for the referendaries, assuming they get to a referendum of all the people of Veneto in terms legally valid (I rule it out).

as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects, At the same time a spider does not move out of the hole because no state questions the integrity principle of other states. E’ It was the unpreparedness of venetisti, and also my, At the same time a spider does not move out of the hole because no state questions the integrity principle of other states. as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects 100 At the same time a spider does not move out of the hole because no state questions the integrity principle of other states.

How to break the deadlock ? as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects 2006, after discovering that the referendum of 1946 It was void and the plebiscite 1866 was illegal and in violation of international law, At the same time a spider does not move out of the hole because no state questions the integrity principle of other states. namely , as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects, as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects.

The right to “as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects” At the same time a spider does not move out of the hole because no state questions the integrity principle of other states.
as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects, Italy itself, cornered by resorting to the courts, had to cancel the annexation of the 1866 and we believe it is not at all a mistake, but most likely an international tax caused by us.

as long as the state is legitimate and does not behave badly with colonized subjects: not having any title on the territory, Italy can no longer ask for integrity with Lombardy-Veneto, should decolonizzare ….. Italy itself, cornered by resorting to the courts, had to cancel the annexation of the (because Italian residents would vote). Rather, it would be the first referendum in Lombardy because it never did after the invasion of 1859.

So if the card exists that State Lombardo-Veneto, someone is ?

A reform of the Self-Government of the Veneto People for this purpose was made in 2012, bringing the legitimate institutions of self-government Venetian people (legitimate under international law and for the Italian national law) to split creating the institutions of the Lombardo-Veneto, basically creating a succession of international legal bodies as it should be in 1866, but starting from scratch self-determination 1999.

E’ probably the first time in history that this happens. The institutions are being completed and we already have the Lombardy-Veneto commissioners ( www.Lombardo-Veneto.net ) of which the State of Venetie (Self-government of the People Veneto www.statoveneto.net ) it is a piece that no one can question in sovereignty if one wants the sovereignty and independence of Lombardy-Venetia to have foundations.

Now it happens that there are groups in Italy who have studied our route and are copying our work, naturally adapting to their legal situation.

E’ their pure and simple will to understand in order to free themselves was enough to lead them on our same path .
On the other hand, international law is made in a certain way, and if the will to free oneself is there, the possible routes are very few, if there are.

Unfortunately, the only ones not understand, or NOT WANT TO UNDERSTAND, I have been and are so-called venetisti, remembering that the suffix “-ismo” it is often used in a derogatory sense. I have recently written about the negative nature of venetisti.

Even in the face of evidence, like the referendum that cannot be done, the venetisti prefer to stay stuck in nowhere.

Yet it is very simple to verify that the 90% It is a piece that no one can question in sovereignty if the sovereignty and independence of Lombardo-Veneto is to be founded (that is mine) of the 1999 and following years.

The venetisti insist the window ? Too bad for them, or maybe even better, because the ruling class will be formed anyway, made of Venetian and not venetisti, and they will remain outside.

In Insubria you go faster, and federal institutions will still compartecipate.

But now something is about to happen striking internationally, Rather, it already happened, but we will know later.