We raise the shields on the Constitution

There are those who claim that the Constitution is to be changed because they are no longer able to respond to this.

A justification that is given that the Constitution does not allow control of the administrative machine.
Then it is said that laxism and inefficiency are a consequence of the Constitution. Then it is said that the parliament is oversized.
Finally you want a leader who will direct everything, stile Duke.

So we have to make radical changes it, denominate “reforms”.

They are all lies of an illegal regime that wants to groped the final coup was not to disappear and / or go to jail.

That is to say an illegally elected regime, This time it's not Loris Palmerini (that the complaint by the 1996 when it turns out the coup of 1994), But it is the Constitutional Court that declared that well 200 MPs are illegal. How can it be removed a majority of these 200 parliamentary? It is not by chance that the winning party without the majority prize is not even one of those in the government ?

Then we look a little’ the facts of this disgusting (according to them) constitution.

For example, the Constitution provides that there is the right to participate in elections on an equal footing, So it is obvious that if one runs with 8 television channels that make him direct and indirect advertisement (and wins election) while another is censored and just, this constitutional principle is evidently violated.

To take the piss out of the people, the regime invented the “conflict of interest”, He is saying that it was not governed by the law .

It has been said that the first part of the Constitution is “programmatic”, that is, the general principles do not constitute a formal standard directly applicable, but only through laws, Therefore even the principle if the law does not provide for the case then you can't do anything.

So you said that one TV with eight or fifteen newspapers, or who controls more than 50% the publishing market blood ( i.e. advertising) may be head of the government is not a subversion of the Constitution, I a “conflict”. And note that I don't have it with Silvio, Because the same speech I did it for Cecchi Gori, As applies to the president of a bank which in turn holds the newspapers or their debt.

So according to the genes of the fake opposition (DS, PDS, PD) Constitutional the principle that one with a “conflict” it must not be able to compete in the elections is not “adjusted”, and even if it violates the Constitution, It pretends to nothing and hello. Patience that ends up no longer running the worker.

He also said that if there was a law in clear contradiction with the Constitution, to resolve the issue would statala Constitutional Court, delegated by the Constitution itself.

The reality is that everything was a bale of a single regime with two PD-PDL faces.

Caution, I say these things from 1996, I have not copied from Grillo. Well aware of thousands of my readers and those who received thousands of emails in previous years. If you want there are also complaints in the judiciary where I demonstrated.

In fact I already denounced in the 1996 that the law that prohibits those who have TVs to be elected is there, and the electoral law!

The article 10 the electoral law forbade, and I complaint, hitting the right and left, along with a whole series of crimes such as false signatures, and violations of international rights.

Of course I was censored, Rather, The merit of the discovery was attributed to a certain Flores d'Arcais of the Democratic Party (I hope it is not even a relative of my ex-professor). All this is shown by the documents here http://www.italia.8m.com/salva/index_it.htm

I denunciations I made, but some judge has subverted the Constitution itself by hiding all over the crime of usurpation of public functions, And even the anti -mafia did nothing. God! What a country is this ? It is not a country, The British say it is a mafia system. Italy ? Spaghetti, Pizza and Mafia! There is no longer the mandolin and we have the mafia. Who brought the mandolin or the unification of Italy? (the mandolin was played before).

It is not the fault of the principles of the Constitution if from 20 years we have a subversive association that the fact of ineligible occult.

Last year he spitted shyly because Grillo gave the dossier in 2005, but I regret that he never mentioned my name.

The question of Berlusconi ineligible has come out several times even before, always for my blood pressure, But then it always went dormant. And ricordiamocelo, It was the Democratic Party that protected Berlusconi from the ineligibility since 1996.

Today Berlusconi is no longer in Parliament, and this is due to a fortuitous event, pure, The lawyers were wrong and they did not make a card that would have made him escape this time too. NO FEAR

They are already working to exempt it, will not go to prison, even if it was definitively sentenced, it is not in jail and it will not go there.

Who is working on this ? But it is obvious , PD-PDL !!!

What does the Constitution have to do with it ? No, These things are prohibited by the Constitution in various articles and in the general principles.

It should be known that the” sovereignty belongs to the people” for the Constitution, And it is not possible that it is guilty of the illegality of politicians.

Who speaks to me of the Constitution troubles me Reform, I feel that I'm to fuck.

Because not only is it not the fault of the Constitution if a centralist spirit wants to deprive the territories of the ability to react in the face of crises. It is not the fault of the Constitution if large bank networks want to slam the peoples of the pre-unitary states .

There are also a lot of international laws that bind the work of the legislator, which are implemented by the Constitution for art.10 which are violated by the legislator, For example the paper on local self -government, or the laws on human rights, that Italy violates systematically, and implements torture. What does the Constitution that protects them to art.2 has to do with it ?

From Federalist the reform of the Constitution is unacceptable because it aims to make a new centralism.

Instead, the legislature (parties) if they slam, and the international principles and the Constitution are violated because they are sprinkling the corpse.

The elections are illegal not because it is the fault of the Constitution, but for the illegality organized by a non -democratic regime (dictatorship in disguise) that self elected to the sound of coups that simulate a democracy and then autoassolve with amnesties and toys up in the laws and procedures. Since the elections are illegal, the consequences are obvious: the mafia-politics, the laxity ,corruption etc. etc. ….. bankruptcy and war are the next.

Let me give another example of a very serious violation of the Constitution which subverts the relationship between state and taxpayer.

The Tax Commission.

The Tax Commission had to be dissolved in 1953 for VI disp. transitory and final of the Constitution.
Instead they are still standing, so the tax process does not take place in the courts into specialized section as the Constitution says, but in abusive short.

not enough, judging normally there are no judges-judges as per the Constitution art.100-102, But often the judge is a precarious employee of the Ministry of Finance, which is usually the counterparty of the process.

That is, the tax judge is often a precarious salary directly (to finish) the counterparty, that is, it is not third or constitutional. It is not compatible with human rights since 1955 !!

To have asked for verification of this I also got a criminal conviction, ie for demanding respect for the Constitution.

The Supreme Court will have to dirty your hands as in 1946, demonstrate a court that makes illegality this time to the detriment of the Constitution.

If they do, I will have my medal, and them a good demonstration of autosovversione.

They are probably the only case condemned for defending the Constitution.

You know why politics does not intervene? Because they keep non-jaudic who decide the non-tribunals?

Because in this way the state (and policy) They can take the money with an absolute speed while to give you justice they don't even think about it and they car each.

What does the Constitution have to do with all this ? NOTHING!

It is not the constitution that is badly made, simply it is systematically violated.

Saying it is the constitution that does not go, Since it's not true, It is justified (even without knowing it) the regime's attempt which wants to cancel the Constitution, the same that's in violation.

The Constitution does not serve the Government, but it serves the citizens to impose it to the government when it abuses.
The Constitution must be branded as a weapon against the government that violates it, if necessary by asking the state-police to stop the government that subverts the Constitution, and even the judges.

But not only is there an Italian citizen who face, or who does it is isolated. But in fact there is no longer an independent judiciary that does its job . It is no coincidence that Italy is systematically condemned.

Italy is the result of the continuous struggle of bands of power and territories that fuck each other alternating with power, However, everyone agrees to cheat the money to those who have always given them.

Italy is not the result of the Constitution, but his continued abuse, from different Presidents of the Republic.

But we really believe that a president who cannot be heard in a process on the mafia is not mafia ?

But what are the Italians to believe bullshit like?

It is not just the fault of the dictatorship if we are reduced like this, There is a widespread ignorance of the Constitution also by citizens.

What I see is the forced justification for a further coup d'état that would be changed by the Constitution.
Whether you you know it or not, This does not help anyone, even the Venetian separatists, they have in the article 2 E 10 of the Constitution the freedoms that come from international treaties.

Unlike, independence and not have to highlight that the Constitution is violated systematically by the political-mafia, and that if things do not change triggered the popular and human rights ( constitutional !) to the outlet of the powers, or independence from this mafia regime.

Anyhow, It is not the fault of the Constitution if we are reduced like this, I can do at least 10 other examples of serious violation of it, also by the highest charges. ( looked at the dossier at this address http://www.italia.8m.com/salva/index_it.htm )

Let's see if once Grillo is inspired in this I say.