the “political solution” it is not possible under the Constitution

The Constitution establishes art. 122.
THE “election system” and the cases of ineligibility and incompatibility of the President and the other members of the regional council as well as of the regional councilors are governed by law of the Region within the limits of the fundamental principles established by law of the Republic, which also establishes the duration of the elective organs.

For so much it is not in the power of the government nor of the President of the Republic to change the electoral law, It is a regional competence although in the meantime that the statutes are renewed, someone still applies the previous rule of 1968.

Therefore it is not in the faculty of the government nor of Parliament to change the regional electoral law, a constitutional law would be needed (2 years).

You can only resolve the question with law of the Region. However, where the statutes provide for the competence of the regional council, they are dissolved, And their replacement by the government is improperly improper because the law would be unconstitutional as it would effectively change the constitution.

Moreover, If someone decides to change the law (To benefit your party), It will then have to insert the rules on minority such as the L.N.302/1997 in the same law which have become mandatory for the Lisbon Treaty from 1 DECEMBER 2009.

This means that the Veneto lists should also be redone, where my candidacy for President was declared for the moment disabled because the Court of Appeal has decided that it is done of these rules that are, as well as ratified, higher than the ordinary standard.

art.2 guarantees the inviolable rights of man [ ..] in social formations . However, the Court of Appeal has shown contempt for this principle, but only against the Venetians.

Moreover, those called those called are inviolable “humans” and sanctioned in laws such as L.N.881/1977 and others such as L.N.848/1955 etc..

Art.25 of the 881 he says that ” Every citizen has the right, and must have the possibility, without any
of the discrimination mentioned [..]
A) to participate in the management of public affairs, personally or through freely chosen representatives;
b) to vote and be elected, at genuine elections, periodic, carried out in universal and equal suffrage, and secret vote, that guarantee the free expression of the will of the voters;”

to date, in general, A good part of the citizens who were unable to present themselves due to the onerosity of the presentation have been excluded from applying, as well as the list “Venetie for self-government” In Veneto.

If to make Formigoni's list admit (On the other hand, no longer eligible because already in the third term) it is reduced “running” the number of necessary subscriptions (But it is not clear who can make this change since it is regional competence), The electoral law per game began to be changed, Those situations of other lists must also be reevaluated which have been excluded on the basis of current legislation, As for example the radicals and Venetias for self -government.

And yet, If you go to establish new rules, Then it is consequential that other subjects, If they had known them, they would have decided to undertake the race because they are within their reach with the new limits, But they did not do it for the too onerous number of subscriptions that was established and that now we would like to reduce to do “pass” Friends of power.

in conclusion :
– It is not admissible in no case that the rules are changed by the government
– possibly will have to bite the regional rule the regional body provided for by statute if active or the junta in the silence of the statute
– The elections should be started again or prolong the terms for the presentation of 30 At least to give way to benefit from benefiting from the law

If you change the elections differently, we will face no longer to laws to “person” but law “to the partition”, We would be faced with the creation of a new fascist party that self -elevates and self -proclaims itself while preventing the participation of others, slowly we are already inside the dictatorship. It would therefore be an subversion of the democracy principles and of “Rule of Law” , challengeable in front of international courts, with a few euros.

But there is the serious risk that the conclamation of the “State Party” legitimate in law anyone to constitute themselves in independent and sovereign government in defense of constitutional rights, If necessary also armed in order to protect human rights that include those of participation.

In short, it is not to be made the modification of the rules by the government and the parliament.
If you make new rules, These must take into account the rules of the Council of Europe that became binding with the Lisbon Treaty.
But then everything stops and starts again from Chief.

A bad mess. But this really is the quality of the government party ?