E’ the independence of Lombardy-Venetia is possible? AND ( part 3 of 6 )
Going back to my article, it proves once again that the Lombardo-Veneto (a sovereign state) It is united to Italy in violation of the Treaty of 1866, that is, the union was made by force, ie illegally: technically it is a busy state. If not enough, The state law n ° 212 December 2010, Italian law, canceled the annexation of the 1866 , effectively by the gennium 2013. It is a Natta law from the push of our appeal to the Council of Europe of the 2008. Marco talks about it in the letter , And he says that "As for the much-vaunted lack of jurisdiction, It simply happened that a judge was asked a matter on which he had no jurisdiction (which has nothing to do with the legal or non-legal membership of Lombardy-Venetia in Italy)” , But it is also true that if this judge had had the documentation to affirm his jurisdiction, that is, the validity of the annexation, it would be required to affirm declaring lack of jurisdiction and not the absolute lack of jurisdiction, that is, if he did not do it, it is because he could not.
These aspects therefore make sense, it's a lot, today again, Especially since the Constitutional Court will have to discuss it in March 2018 in the context of analysis of Legge.reg. del Veneto n ° 28 of the 2016. In fact, the Court was required by me to evaluate the validity not only of the annexation of the 1866, but also, of cancellation.
If you do not understand the international sovereignty of Lombardy-Veneto and the Human Rights of the Venetians, Then we fall into the speech of article 5 of the Italian Constitution, that however does not apply in the context of international law, It is the establishment of a state that demands legal presence in the area without being able to demonstrate it, The title of annexation of the entire Lombardy is missing in the context of Lombardy-Veneto autonomous and self-government as it should have been in 1866, And this has certainly not been remedied by the last referendum on the internal autonomy of 2017. Moreover I have shown in 2007 (ten years ago!) that even the monarchy-republic referendum 1946 (and then the Constituent Assembly of the Republic ) They have not been legally valid for the lack of vote of the territories of Istria and Dalmatia then under Italian jurisdiction. In short, the discourse of art.5 of the Constitution would be valid whether to talk about Lombardo-Veneto did not make sense, he enters me what l 'ha.
