Mark recalled that the Constitutional Court pursuant to article 5 Cost. ha dichiarato la impossibilitÃ della Regione Veneto (but in each region) the secession, and it is obvious and natural thing for an organ of the Italian Republic, rather, questo era giÃ sancito con la sentenza 365 of the 2007.
My article on the Lombardo-Veneto in fact showed that under international law it is not necessarily Italian territory, law that prevails on the Constitution under article 10. On the other hand, with the Treaty of Osimo 1971 Italy would give Istria and Dalmatia to Yugoslavia, in violation of article 5 Cost, if it was possible that no one can now say that there is no previous.
If Mark says the Italian Republic as a fundamental pillar of the art.5 Cost, then I fear that this is not a sufficient basis for the future, certainly it is not politically or culturally, nor can justify the conditions in which they live, the Venetians citizens subjected to corruption,to 'inefficiency , servitude to foreign powers who use them as medical guinea pigs, plus institutionally oppressed by systematic exclusion to high state offices as magistrates, prefects, etc. etc. Penalizzati nelle scuole e nelle UniversitÃ nonostante i test internazionali ne dimostrino gli ottimi risultati, forced to pay a lot more taxes in the face of high tax evasion territory, etc. etc. etc..
Before or after a divorce Venetians citizens from this state to invoke something else, rather, not only the Venetians but all peoples of the states pre-unification. Anzi mi sembra evidente che queste aspirazioni a qualcos’altro siano sempre piÃ¹ frequenti, and this was the thrust that we had to Europe, or for some the Secession, and today I see more and more interest to a foreign power like Russia. I am proposing for years that the return to the pre-unification States free from debt (it invaded) It is our only option, preferably in a confederation of free states to leave when they want.