On vaccines my global perspective
The comment from a user who MarcoPoli17 signature drives me to a summary of my thoughts on vaccines
This is his comment : “Mr. palmerini, I remind you that in the meantime the oviedo convention also contains the article 26 that you always forget to mention:
art. 26 – Restriction on the exercise of rights
The exercise of the rights and the provisions of protection contained in this Convention cannot be subject to other restrictions that are other than those that, provided by law, constitute the necessary measures, in a democratic society, public safety, the prevention of crime, the protection of public health or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
And that I should still explain, compared with a substantial increase in vaccination coverage where data of this alleged massacre.”
I answer : Article 26 does not allow the denial of the rights of the Oviedo Convention, Unlike, “The exercise of the rights and the protection provisions contained in this Convention cannot be the subject of [..] restrictions“, unless measures are necessary for public security (and we talk about public order and terrorism), the prevention of crime (and I do not think that we are in this case) and regarding the protection of public health obviously does not refer to normal, but the devastating epidemics, like those of Ebola.
In fact, it is also the rights of each one that says art.2 of the Oviedo Convention which affirms the
“Primacy of the human being: The interest and the good of the human being must prevail over the sole interest of society or science.”
therefore the protection of the rights and freedoms of others obviously cannot go beyond this limit, is not, precisely as established by art.26, to catastrophic emergencies of public order or epidemic. And where the emergency in Italy would be? The measles than those who have not made the calls and get sick 30 years because vaccinated by children? Obviously, art.26 cannot be read in the manner to deny the content of all the rule, it is obvious.
With regard to the massacres, Here 2 articles that give gruesome numbers damaged and died in the cradle, but there are also dead after years consequential pathologies and the damage of the substances present in the vaccine and some of his components in particular.
Regarding the “significant increase in vaccination coverage”, look that only under 16 They are partially vaccinated, so we actually talk about even the 30% of the population, and always pretending that immunization with vaccines really work , For example, in 8% of measles cases they are vaccinated people . in conclusion, In other words, THE 70% the population is not immune from diseases for which vaccines had, Indeed it is most impressed precisely because it had been vaccinated and did not make the calls.
Because there are no countered the “covers” in the correct way? What are the real interests of all this staging ?
If you want to receive news on the topic vaccines can :
WhatsApp, subscribe to NVX chat info 1
via email, subscribe to the list “No vaccine requirement – Convection Oviedo”
