Judge of Venetian nationality and language: appeal in court signed by 345 people

What I'm going to talk about is not a political initiative, but an absolutely initiative based on the law and laws, International Raw.

THE 4 September 2009 I presented an appeal in Strasbourg which in a few years will give the Venetians of all the Veneto the right to have trials judged by a “natural judge” ( that is, Venetian), in the court of the Venetian people, held in the Venetian language. The appeal is supported by 345 of Venetian signatures that have given me the mandate to represent them, but they can add.

That's where it comes from . Two years ago I went to see a tax process in a “tax commission”, that is, seeing one of those proceedings similar to a trial decides people's fiscal and tax issues.

But in fact it is all false, because lE “tax commission” They were established by fascism but the constitution of the 1948 He has imposed the dissolution within 5 years ( v. Note 1).

this is not enough, in these processes the “judge” he is not an ordinary magistrate as required by the Constitution in art.102 (v. Note 2).

All this is a disgrace to Western civilization , also serious for our Venetian history because it was committed in what Manzoni described as “land of St. Mark, land of freedom” .

I was there, and I looked at the unfortunate turn (are many) who he was trying to defend himself, but since the accountant had dumped him at the last minute, the fake judges didn't even give him the right to speak, shouting “STIA SHUT UP YOU!!!” When these Shagged.

Then after a while’ They emerged from the public and are asking if they intervened, the fake judges, They were ordinary judges as provided by the constitution, and if that was a ” specialized section for materials at the’ ordinary judicial body, as provided for by art.102 c2 of the Constitution, and not a court set up by fascism.

The bureaucrat Chamber of Commerce (other body of fascist foundation) who made the accusation maintained that everything was legal, that the “court” special “tax commission” It was entitled by law tacitly.

I countered that instead everything was outlawed, that the constitution was respected, and that they were committing crimes, they had to suspend the process and “raise the issue in front of a constitutional judge”, as expected from the procedure.

They demanded that he leave, but I insisted, I am saying that I objected to the violation of constitutional laws, and that if I continued I would have called the police to arrest them in the act for breach of constitution.

Instead they anticipated me and called the police, which did not proceed to write on record the facts. Because I didn't want to sign an incomplete and false report in which I essentially accused myself, They were taken to the police station.

I was sued for interruption of public service and other offenses.

Newspapers, the gazette and the morning, They wrote falsely saying they had stopped the process in the name of the Venetian sovereign and independent, which was completely false because I was instead asserting the illegality of the tax process.

Then when I received the complaint, I reiterated the reasons for my place, however, asking the judge to declare himself unable to judge, as the Venetian territory is under its own self-government of the Venetian people according to the constitutional law art.2 n.340 of 1971.

Moreover, doing this to judge that in 1866, since there had been a violation of the international treaties for the cession of Lombardy-Veneto , the territory had not been legally ceded to Italy and therefore the judge could not ( and it can not) declare lawful judge , or due to lack of legitimacy, both for the internal law, and therefore why he cannot declare himself “natural judge” which is mandatory under the European Convention on Human Rights.

then, Already in 2007 asked the judge to declare the “lack of jurisdiction” and referred the matter to the Veneto People's Court as the competent judicial authority . But I had done the same thing for the Segato 2000, and then for others.

It once was my turn.

In February 2008 in Venice a ruling was produced on the appeal that I wrote for Life and presented by the lawyer. of the moon.

then, an action in March 2008 I reiterated to the magistrate of Padua investigating me, that the ruling required him to declare himself on the third judge, because the state illegally present in the territory.

The magistrate, violating the law 848/1956, which provides for the right to the natural judge and the right to appeal, no one ever answered.

THE 4 September 2009 I then sent to Strasbourg proceedings to enforce the right to judge Venetian (then the court of the Venetian people) that makes me a Venetian language process.

Note that the 5 September 2009 I am no longer the president of the Veneto People's Court .

This appeal will take a long time, few years, but it is probably this appeal and not the one presented in 2008 the reason why these results will be achieved in a few years, that means processes judged by a Venetian Judge (then the court of the Venetian people) held in the Venetian language.

What they say the parties are shit to cover those who are doing really change. Just as the newspapers are doing by mystifying the story of the Venetian language and our rights.

But unfortunately, it seems that the appeal presented to the Court of Human Rights in 2008 ended up being merged with an appeal previously presented by another person, copying ours, and which however will invalidate everything because the natural judge was not relied upon in his appeal.

This new appeal I submitted, signed by over 300 people, However, it will be an act in itself that Strasbourg will not be able to ignore.

We need to send, every month if possible, an appeal in Strasbourg, until they can no longer deny the right as Italy wants.

I 345 who signed they are not part of those who signed the appeal 2008, and you can send additional supporting signatures. let's talk about

Note 1 – Transitional and Final Provisions – WE “Within five years of the entry into force of the Constitution, the currently existing special jurisdiction bodies will be reviewed, excluding the jurisdiction of the State Council, the Court of Auditors and the military tribunals.”

Note 2 – art. 102 constitution

The judicial function is exercised by ordinary magistrates established and regulated by the rules on the judicial system.

They can not be established extraordinary or special judges Judges. They can only be established within the ordinary courts specialized sections for specific matters, also with the participation of qualified citizens who are on the judiciary.

The law regulates the cases and forms of direct participation of the people in the administration of justice.

Constitution on the site of the Quirinal

http://www.quirinale.it/qrnw/statico/costituzione/costituzione.htm