Another fake initiative by Gianluca Busato

With the usual great fanfare and unmotivated Mr. Gianluca Busato ( already known in the news for the invented electronic referendum) presented its appeal initiative at the European Court of Human Rights (CEDU). The Court is the same one that only yesterday condemned Italy for killing hundreds of people, injecting them with blood infected with HIV and more.

E’ another of the things he copied from us, in addition to the illegal use of the symbol, in 2015 Busato has issued an appeal against Equitalia which is a total copy (including commas) of our questioning of the 2014 filed by several people arising from others filed in the courts since the year 2000, Busato copied it by changing the heading, there was a justice will quote for false and economic damage.

Now we copy of the appeal to the ECHR, What we have done in 2008, and unfortunately It went badly for us that time because the court gave the representation of 26 people Daniele Quaglia, who, however, instead lost his lucidity by starting to fantasize directly to the TV and newspapers of the armed Venetian police, forgetting to follow the appeal which thus ended ( the Venetian people have lost years of their rights for this). However the appeal (written entirely by me) had the merit of pushing the Italian government to cancel the annexation of Lombardy-Veneto in 2010 effectively 2013.

Now it is necessary to know that an appeal can be made to the Court of Human Rights for the violation of a right provided for by the Council of Europe legislation., then the so-called Convention ECHR.

Busato has appealed for the right to self-determination, which does not fall within the scope of the ECHR, is a UN Source right, and in fact we 2008 We made use of the right to a natural judge who falls into the convection ECHR.

However, before resorting (recourse) the ECHR Court must above all play the long internal judicial process, that is, ask a competent judge for recognition of the right, then make all the internal degrees, Then follow the law Pinto, only after appealing to the Council of Europe.

Busato made no recourse, he claims he cannot do so because there is no direct appeal to the Constitutional Court. This isn't true, the Constitutional Court can be asked to decide, even if he doesn't have to, but above all the question of Busato, if anything, it would cover the ordinary courts, for sure however is not about the ECHR.

In our case, we in 2008 we skipped all the steps because the sentence of the judge of Venice had ruled the “ABSOLUTE FAILURE OF JURISDICTION”, that is, in practice the judge himself told us that no judge under the Italian system could answer our questions, thus giving us the green light to the court ECHR.

It does not appear that Busato has taken these required steps nor that he has any judgment of lack of jurisdiction, that applies only in connection with the self-governing institutions of the Venetian people.

Moreover Busato marks for the right to self-determination, and this right is not entitled to the residents of an administrative region like Veneto region. Busato claims to have played a referendum of the people of Veneto, we know this is not the case , not only because the data turns out to be invented, but above all because there was no consultation of the Venetian people but instead of the residents of the Veneto region, which are anything but. trivially, what right they have voted Italian citizens residing in the Veneto to decide the fate of the people of Veneto ? E’ as if the referendum had voted greek German!

So among other things Busato is not even entitled to make a request to the ECHR or any other court because legally he does not have any interest or rights, in short, he does not represent anyone legally because he has never held elections of the Venetian people according to international law.

The ECtHR will probably reply to Busato that it is an inadmissible appeal, Or, if Freemasonry still will support the initiatives Busato (as demonstrated with great media support), then the Court initially “will welcome” the appeal, will pass 4 The 5 years, and when he discusses it he will say that it is not’ It has been violated any law of the ECHR Convention (as explained above).

So in the meantime the Venetian people will have wasted further years behind fake referendums and attempts at illegal referendums, and will continue not to understand that it immediately has the right to sovereignty and independence. Only when the Venetian people are able to understand that their only legal institutions are those of self-government born in 1999, because they are also legal heirs of the Lombardy-Veneto State, then you will have these rights.

However, If an heir does not understand his rights and does not learn to manage his properties, he is also destined to be left without his inheritance.