Here's how the election scam works

The Italian democratic system has been non-existent for decades, what we are seeing are not elections, but a well-organized fraud. I have proved this many times, most recently with the Veneto Regionals of 2020.

In a nutshell I try to describe the system, and what I describe is the result not only of studies, but above all of real practice. Plainly, I applied in 2005 as provincial councillor, and in addition to being totally censored, they also took away votes counted with my own hands. in 2009 I presented myself to the Presidency of the Province with my list, and I was the only candidate totally obscured. in 2010 E 2020 I ran for the Veneto regional elections, always with my list, and I have always been excluded but I have demonstrated in both cases that the elections are rigged from the ground up.

Said this, Let's see how the system works.

There are characters who are kept floating in the media for years, that is, they are made visible to play the part of the antagonists, but they must do it in a very moderate way, almost useless, to make the majority believe that a free debate exists. I'll come back to this usage later, which is necessary to keep the real opposition excluded from the media.

The floats are always kept ready to be used at the right time, not only in case of unexpected events, but for the elections.

Because they are floating ? Because to be visible in the media you must be authorized and wanted by the system, otherwise there is also a proscription list, of prohibition, for really uncomfortable characters. The existence of this list was confirmed to me by a senior Mediaset executive.

I have been on the proscription list since 1996 Al 2000, then I was partially cleared but always away from the elections. Then I was banned again until 2016 when they had to make me appear on TG1 given that I had approved the law that recognized the rights of national minorities to the Venetians, get canceled by Zaia in 2018. from the 2017 I am totally censored despite having made very serious denunciations from the NoVax stages in front of many thousands of people.

What are they for? “floating” and how they recognize each other?

First of all, a float is recognized because it will never say on TV (to millions of people) really serious things, for example that compulsory vaccinations are against international law and the Constitution, or that public debt is a fraud by private banks, etc.

If a floater tells uncomfortable truths then he does it because someone else (a true antagonist) he said it in the streets or in a media that provides visibility, so it is necessary to hide this possible leader by giving visibility to the float. But in this case the float will speak from a poorly visible container, or visible what is necessary.

So, if you hear someone say things on TV that you heard months earlier from others who were not visible, the float is the one on TV and the original is the one you heard months before.

So don't trust last minute twists and critical revisions during elections, check what they said or didn't say months ago.

Because floaters are on TV ? To occupy the media space which is fundamental during elections and to monitor social trends.

The demonstrable fact, numbers in hand, is that without media visibility the electoral result will be very poor or insufficient, the barriers will not be overcome. Especially since the media is completely driven by the techniques of “social psychology” and are owned by international bankers.

Without visibility, the real antagonists will be defeated and will not be able to say that the system is a dictatorship, because if people understood that it was a dictatorship, not only legitimacy would result, but also the need to use force to free ourselves from this dictatorship.

Practically, the democratic fiction acts as a sedative and ensures that the very will for change is subdued. It's not my concept , my di J.J. Rousseau who wrote something like “every dictatorship feigns freedom, thus subjugating the will itself”.

The Regime, not being able to totally censor an antagonistic movement and risk reawakening minds, implements cloning, copying, that is, the creation of fake antagonistic movements, clones of the original ones, to which the regime will give partial visibility. In this way the appearance of freedom and democracy is preserved, and furthermore, real dissent will flow into the fake container, thus taking away from the original movement.

for example, a possible original leader will have the words copied from the floats, leader clone.

So what will happen is a new potential dissenter , came into contact with the true leader, will think that it ( the original leader ) copies the already well-known clone leader. Over time the original movement will be accused of “have little following”.

Anyhow, arrived at the elections, some characters will be placed in the real antagonist electoral lists and in the clone ones who can be used to possibly spark a scandal.

However, the problem of candidacies from competing lists is basically solved with other substantial impediment techniques.

In the meantime, it is important to know that to present a list it is necessary to collect an enormous quantity of signatures in a short time, something practically impossible, for example in 2022 must be collected 50.000 companies in 15 operating days and on already established lists (which cannot exist) with names written, and authenticated.

For the new antagonists, collecting subscriptions in accordance with the law is practically impossible, because they should be collected in the presence of an authenticator (for example a city councilor authorized by the mayor, or a delegate of the mayor, or delegate of the province, or a notary) which are all people from other parties or paid (I noticed) so no one comes to do it or it costs you thousands of euros. So parties actually collect signatures without a legal authenticator and then find someone, always from the other parties, which authenticates them to you as true, which is a forgery and a criminal offence. At that point, even if you enter the system, you are already corrupt. I reported these things in 1996, and Parliament responded by repealing the crime which was then reintroduced see www.palmerini.net/dossier

In any case, it takes approximately tens of thousands of signatures to collect 10 euros each, expense that can be reduced with thousands of people working for free but only if they know what they are doing, because one mistake is enough to see the work in vain. The heat is aggravating when it is even difficult to find people at the market in the heat.

The parties in Parliament already elected the previous time are exempt from all this effort, the collection of subscriptions (companies) of voters needed to run are not required for them, but with some exceptions. So those in the regime illegally abuse this exemption to distort the game, for example, in the Veneto Regional Council, even those who have never previously been elected can be exempted from signatures if they are indicated by a group leader councilor, or even the mixed group. in 2020 of 18 candidate lists in Veneto , 15 they were exempt even if only the majority were applying for the first time.

So given the pressure, the difficulties and limited time for antagonistic movements, exemption from signatures will be offered but which will have to go through a change of leader, and it will be precisely that float visible on TV that replaces the original leader.

If it happens that an antagonistic movement manages to collect signatures ( in 2009 we took it 3 weeks of banquets at the markets, 3 full-time people with lots of work and economic problems), if he succeeds he is simply kept blacked out in the media.

In short, at the moment of presentation of the electoral lists, the clone movement will be exempted from collecting signatures because some floating character will make the exemption available, while the real antagonistic movements, also rooted, they will not be able to collect signatures, also because the elections will suddenly greatly reduce the time available for collecting signatures.

At that point the game is already done and the result is obtained, the vote is irrelevant.

True antagonistic movements will be excluded from the race or will participate lame and in any case with zero visibility, and as a consequence they will probably not be able to overcome the entry barrier.

The clone movements, however, will be present on the ballot paper, and according to the trend and the polls they will receive adequate visibility sufficient to prevent any antagonists from gathering dissent. In particular, some candidates from the clone movement will receive greater visibility, those already ready for future tears.

At the end of the elections, if any antagonist or clone candidate will be elected, however, this will be marginal: if already controlled then he will remain in a low profile or deny previous ideas, if not checked then a discredit campaign will be launched, and a silent act of corruption, deviation, intimidation, damage to private life, which will ensure that the person elected converts to the regime or ends up in dust and oblivion.

This system is not correctable, it is the founding basis of the regime, so any complaints of electoral fraud always end up in nothing, especially when made by authentic characters who work for the common good and especially if they are not blackmailable for their own flaws such as drug use, perversion, corruption etc.

In a nutshell, There is no democratic possibility in Italy, There are no free and truthful elections, therefore participating in the elections as a candidate can only strengthen the illusion that something can change.

However, if you want to give chance a chance, create an opportunity, then you can go and vote for a new party, and perhaps something will change over the centuries. But it's something for desperate people who have no other way to try something.

Personally, I pursue the restoration of a more humane state and government system, where even capable dissidents can emerge, and to achieve it I propose the return to independence of the pre-unification states, and I mean the Venetians, Insubri and Mantovani that legally one can return to Lombardy-Veneto 1859 through the Plan Z, the international appeal and what it entails.

Here is a very brief explanation of how the system works. Continue to delude yourself if you like.