PLEBISCITO FRAUD 2014 – index

The so-called referendum-plebiscite of 2014 for the independence of the Veneto organized by the Plebiscito.Eu website ended with incredible numbers of participants and voters. The main promoter Gianluca Busato, published on the site these results

Yet there are many things that are wrong, They requested the people on the street did not vote overwhelmingly (especially in big cities), and a technical analysis demonstrates a total unreality of the votes cast .

The first to launch an accusation on the data was the site RischioCalcolato, He noted that numbers do not conform in the News section, but the count that appears on a site is easily manipulated or it can be the program's mistake. However, other elements of serious doubt have emerged. The writer is convinced of the need to return to the stay preunitari, that is, an independentist, and he has been working against the political-banking mafia who enslaved the peoples of Italy, but it does not fall from the frying pan to the fire, that's why I have this complaint against another lie. But with me there is a Audit Committee

Let's start by understanding some elements. For each voter had to vote:
1) go to the site (1 page views), enter the code and click
2) on the page with the referendum question (1 page views) rate and click
3) on the page with the candidates could vote or exit (third page displayed)
for those who continued to vote the other questions:
4) there were others 3 pages with the remaining questions.

This means that the vote “MINIMUM” was of 3 pages, which means that for almost 2,5 million votes there should be almost 7,5 million pages served.
According to the big operators, there was absolutely no such traffic, not even 100.000 pages. And you want Alexa, Google and all are lying ?

Plebiscito supporters said the votes were actually collected in gazebos, but in reality even in the gazebos people voted online via tablet and PC.

Then supporters fabled that the big electronic plebiscite would mostly take place over the phone, even inventing a “CALL CENTER” with 80 operators, but there is no record of “CALL CENTER” and in any case does not add up equally as shown below, We would still be in 300.000 maximum votes collected with your phone.

Here is a series of articles that analyze the individual elements:

– missing data traffic on the voting site, 350.000 thousand high marks revised downward;
– they invented an imaginary Call Center, But not enough;
– polls disavow the numbers, and technical journals do not support them
– the value of the indices on Auditel style site is confirmed
– they did not have identification card numbers, since the electoral rolls do not contain these numbers;
– they certainly did not all electoral rolls, and used telephone directories, something demonstrated by the fact that many have received the card at the old address where they were no longer residents for some time;
– many municipalities did not deliver any card (Rubano, Limena, Padua etc.) and they have not even received the request of electoral lists (locker etc)
– the voting card has arrived only in a few municipalities, for example in Padua and neighboring municipalities it has not arrived, already alone 300.000 people.
– the main media gave the initiative a lot of visibility BEFORE AND DURING the voting week
– Busato said the Things proven false

Considerations:
– Want one State Veneto with the Government of Bandits ?
– Busato after the vote said the republic Veneta, And Zaia ?
Since there will be a mess “national” the Venetians (There will come a kilo of poop to head home), the world will laugh at it for years. These bubolari will have to be disbarred for life by the Venetian community?

Other than exciting media effect, a historical shame, I have already defined it “PLEBISCITO FRAUD 2014” to make a pair with that of 1866 made by the Italian Government.

Moreover among the activists and promoters of this obscenity “plebiscitaria” there are many of those who already in the 2009 They had defamed web with charges of belonging to the secret services, in addition to Busato himself who accused me of having favored the death of Bepin Segato in prison (thus tarnishing his memory since he left written testimony that he preferred prison rather than falsely accusing me as the magistrate of freedom wanted).

In short, among the plebiscitaries there are also bad thugs who have already been disbarred for life from the institutions of Self-Government of the Venetian People, so this time for the good of the Venetian people would need to go to jail for scam “telematics” and everything connected.

Prepare the umbrella.

PS: to me a scammer is always just a scammer, I don't care about his nationality