The referendum for Venetian independence serves to make A NEW ANNESSION
In the bill of calling the consultative referendum on the independence of Veneto, Independence proposed by Veneta, it is read:
“The referendum is also necessary to verify the adhesion to republican Italy by the Venetian people, since the plebiscite – plebiscite and therefore not referendum – of the 1866, carried out with all sorts of pressure and in a legality regime at all different from that guaranteed at the beginning of the third millennium by international institutions and by the democracy gained by the experience of world wars, he was referring to a quite different political-institutional situation, since it was the Kingdom of Italy born in March of 1861 and not of the Italian Republic as it is defined and carried out by the Constitution entered into force in 1948.”
The original textit's here http://www.consiglioveneto.it/crvportal/pdf/pratiche/9/pdl/PDL_0342/1000_5Ftesto_20presentato.pdf , read page 3 , fifth paragraph.
Let's see the main elements:
1) The plebiscite of 1866 it was not a referendum
2) The plebiscite of 1866 he was not free but “carried out with all sorts of pressure”
3) The plebiscite of 1866 It has no legality similar to that of current international institutions (that is, it is not valid!)
4) The plebiscite of 1866 it was for the annexation to the Kingdom of Italy and not to the Italian Republic (I'm 2 different states !)
5) The referendum is necessary for “to verify” The adhesion of the Venetian people to the Italian Republic
E’ It is already clear that the text questioned the legal possession of the Veneto by the Italian Republic.
In reality the treaty of the 1866 speaks of Lombardy-Veneto .
Add that with the LEGISLATIVE DECREE 13 DECEMBER 2010, n. 212, entered into force on 16 DECEMBER 2010, the Italian State has repealed many regulations, including Royal Decree no. 3300 of 4 November 1866 which stated in Art. 1."The provinces of Venice and that of Mantua are an integral part of the Kingdom of Italy." . Law 3841 of 18 July 1867 of conversion of the Reg.Decr.n.3330/1866 is also fallen as a rule prior to 1 January 1970 as required by law no. 246 of the 28 November 2005.
So the question becomes : as legal title of possession of the Lombardo-Veneto possesses the Italian Republic?
Answer: nobody , all the more if the sentence is evident ” plebiscite of 1866, carried out with all sorts of pressure”, that is, invalid.
Here, then, is the referendum for the independence of Veneto (which he would probably lose with new frauds that are difficult to prove) it would lead to the result exactly opposite to what the separatists believe: A NEW ANNEX OF VENETO
It wouldn't even be the first case. In Italy we already have a striking case of referendum made to obtain the opposite of what supporters believe. in 2011 I denounced the so-called referendum on water (with the slogan “common good water”) it was a scam, that in reality, if he had won, In reality he would have done the opposite of what he said. In fact, all the common good water committees were convinced that if the water won the water (the water pipes) it would not have been privatized.
Reading the question of the referendum on the water I discovered that the referendum canceled the public property of the pipes provided for by the previous standard, and at the same time it did not prevent the privatization of the service alone (not of the property) which would remain in force equally because they are European rules. Remote 2 years, many municipalities including Padua, Parma etc. THEY ARE SELLING THEIR SHAREHOLDINGS IN THE COMPANIES TO MULTINATIONALS’ PUBLIC WATER, carrying out the privatization of the pipes.
HERE IT IS NOT’ STRANGE THAT THE REFERENDUM FOR THE INDEPENDENCE OF VENETO IS USED TO MAKE A NEW ANNEX.
It is a scam organized probably by hidden Freemasonies who don't know anymore’ HOW TO KEEP THE VENETI SLAVES. (I am available for a public debate, but those of Indipendenza Veneta and Veneto Stato do not want to)
The legal reality is that Lombardy-Veneto is already sovereign, but it is a busy state.
WE CAN EXERCISE OUR SOVEREIGNTY’ IN INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT IN A PEACEFUL WAY WITHOUT REFERENDUM.
