The Venetian Republic requests authorization from the Bank of Italy, that is, no autonomy

The Venetian Republic requests authorization from the Bank of Italy, Ambient, territorial government, tourism, right to study, training and education, The Venetian Republic requests authorization from the Bank of Italy, economical progress, Health and welfare.

The A reports itssessore regional reforms Antonio Bartolini after the discussion of the Regional Council. Bartolini also highlights that you want “carry on this path and to share it also with the regions close to Umbria, in particular the Marche”.

The first thing I know is that even Umbria simply with a resolution of the Council, on the example of Emilia Romagna, ask the Government to transfer the management of those subjects them. It can be ascertained that this is perfectly legal and responds to art.116 of the Constitution, who actually does not ask for a referendum at all but only the opinion of local authorities.

The Veneto instead voted in favor of a referendum, Then they lost years waiting for a sentence of the Constitutional Court that declared its legitimacy because the question of autonomy was mixed with that of independence for which money has also been collected unnecessarily. The Constitutional Court obviously admitted the referendum for autonomy because it is falling within regional competences, instead by rejecting the one on independence because it is prohibited by the Combinat of Article 26 and 27 the new Regional Statute 2014 wanted by Zaia. In fact, the previous status of the 1971 He did not prevent the referendum for independence at all. Just to know Already in 2013 I said on TV that the referendum for independence would be rejected, the Constitutional Court seems to have copied from that my speech and book that I still had written before.

the question is: Because in Lombardy and Veneto they have been lost years to carry out an unnecessary referendum costing tens of millions of euros for the other?

Zaia has argued that this gave the political mandate, But in reality he already had it from the elections and could proceed immediately with the requests, as demonstrated by Emilia Romagna and Umbria.

They lost a lot of money and years.

But on closer, since this transfer was already possible in 2001 or 2002 at the entrance into force of the reformed Constitution, why the regions have not asked for anything in the fifteen (15) following years?

At least it is hoped that this “Autonomy” serve in some, and I fear and I say that it will probably be of no use, The point is that all these movements each claim to be legitimized to act in the name and on behalf of the entire Veneto population.

Mind you: I told everyone to vote for the referendum, and to insist on asking for autonomy, not to give excuses to those who promise “salvation” with this “Autonomy” but that in reality I fear there will be no true autonomy in the meaning that is given to this words, And here's why.

It seems clear that if this “Autonomy” actually corresponded to a few “saving” for citizens, for example lower taxes, consequently something to someone else it would go off, And this is not possible because in fact Sicily governs which is the black well of waste.

I recently read that even the province of Bolzano is today an active taxpayer of the state, that is, something to be in the republic puts us back. They did a study over, and they would gain enough from becoming totally independent as a Luxembourg.

But anyway it seems obvious that if this “Autonomy” which is promised will actually correspond to some “saving” for citizens, you should go and take something away to someone else as there are fewer state revenues.

Instead it will not be like that, The implementation model simply provides that the Region will perform some functions instead of the state, who has already said that if it saves a few euros they will have to be left in its coffers. It is not true autonomy that of art.116 of the cost, it is “delegation” of materials, which will formally remain of the state but which will make them manage the regions as a kind of external contractor, probably the mechanism of co-ops that are seen working in hospitals.

Morale, There will be no tax savings of citizens, ie less tax, They will only have savings for the state that will leave even more money to the ministries, who at least for a certain time will no longer have to work or get busy to make things turn well, but they will limit themselves to supervising the work of the Regions.

I know you feel this is not like, but I have not candidarmi and deceive people to extort the vote, And someone will say that I say these things alone now why the Veneto Region has made clear delinquenzialmente the law that gave the Venetians the smaller nation rights, But the truth is that I have already said these things even before the referendum, while he is telling everyone to vote for not giving excuses, and waiting for the unmasking of the current regional political. For more, the nation lesser rights to the Venetians still belong to the law of 1994, that do not respect them equally demonstrates the colonization and discrimination that we suffer Venetians.

I return to the theme. Emilia-Romagna and Umbria will get the “Autonomy” requests among those provided for by art.116 of the cost. without a referendum, and then to follow Marche and other Regions; It is evident that if all regions become “autonomous” in the sense that their citizens pay less tax, the State sballerebbe accounts and the budget constraint, it would no longer be able to repay the public debt, and it should be in default, so these autonomies will not result in a tax savings of citizens.

In other words, This run -up to the autonomy of all regions will do the autonomy, it will not correspond to anything in terms of citizens' saving.

Certainly there will be less expenses for the state which, however, will end as usual to use savings to subsidize the usual political and mafia mechanisms.

Certainly there will be more swollen budgets and more jobs to manage for Italian politicians, and we know that the regions do not even shine for their transparency and absence of corruption.

And while the city for a while’ of years will continue to vote to those who have proposed this fake autonomy, but now they do also the regions with the left electorate. On the other hand, the theme of autonomy is already no longer dominated in the Salvini League, which is not the Northern League, It is a party of centralist and unitary center-right-right, Obviously contrary to the independence of the Venetians or any other nation, as also also contrary to the recognition of their human rights of national minorities. I'm sorry for the League who are now in front of the reality that I actually report at least from 2006 at the time of the scam the Devolution, that took away powers to the regions.

The question remains,: because years and millions of euros have been lost to make a referendum that was not necessary ? Because the path to autonomy in the 2002 as soon as it was possible ?