21 Questions to which those who propose a regional referendum for independence does not answer

10 Questions (become well 21) to the proposing regional referendums for independence :let them and not respond

1) E’ true that the Italian Constitution “foreign policy” is reserved for the state for which the regions and their presidents are excluded from’ act internationally on behalf of a “people” ?
2) E’ it is true that the regions can act only on the subjects assigned to them and therefore not on independence ? E’ it is true that the Veneto Region cannot be called an advisory referendum for independence (art.27 statute)?
3) E’ true that the Constitutional Court ruling 365/2007 expressly stated that a region (in that case Sardinia) cannot represent a people ?
4) E’ true that the points 1 E 2 They were incorrectly established by several regional resolutions as 44 of the 2012 in Veneto region ?
5) E’ true that “resolutions” regional laws and are not worth nothing ?
6) E’ It is true that for the Lisbon Treaty the European Union must guarantee the integrity of states like Italy , That is, the EU can never recognize self -managed referendums of the Regions ?
7) E’ it is true that the EU and the UN have not given any support to the Catalans?
8) E’ it is true that the EU did not even respond to those who asked for the independence of Veneto ?
9) E’ true that in international law the “peoples” They are those that are defined on the basis of language, history and annexes and not on the basis of belonging to an administrative region ?
10) E’ true that the “Veneto” when it was passed to Italy in the 1866 and up to 1947 also included the current Friuli Venezia Giulia and therefore they are Venetian for international law ?
11) E’ it is true that in the current Friuli Venezia Giulia region there are so many Venetians that the FVG Region has recognized the existence of the Venetian language ?
12) E’ true that the first Doge Veneto were Grade (FVG region) And the last doge was of Friulian origin ?
13) E’ true that under international law all the territory of the Venetian Republic from Bergamo to Udine are entitled to be part of a future state Venetian ?
14) E’ It is true that when a referendum state is born, it can no longer ask for the return of the historical territories and the stolen goods currently exposed to the Louvre ? E’ true that even if a new born “Veneto State” regional referendum (hypothesis impractical), the Venetian statelet that would remain forever?
15) E’ true that even if he was born a new “Veneto State” by referendum, it should take the share of Italian public debt ( hundreds of billions) Instead of asking for damage from illegal employment ?
16) E’ It is true that such a small and undue Veneto state would collapse economically as Slovenia is happening?
17) E’ it is true that the annexation of the Lombard-Veneto of 1866 it was illegal, and was also canceled by Italy in 2010, and then from January 2013 Lombard-Veneto is no longer legally Italian ? We are obliged to make referendums or we are already sovereigns? Because it goes so much for this referendum? It serves to restore the lost sovereignty from Italy?
18) E’ It is true that the sentence on Kosovo states that the representatives of a state body or region from which we detach are not to declare sovereignty but of the independent bodies of self -government?
19) E’ It is true that the UN will never recognize the Venetians because in the Security Council there are France, England and USA who have contrary interests and rights of veto ?
21) E’ it is true that the referendum for the independence of Veneto cannot be directed by the Veneto Region, nor by a conglomeration of parties, but it must be managed by an authority of self -government ?
22) E’ true that a survey by self-referendum parties, It would not have international legal force ?
23) E’ It is true that the only precedent of State born from a referendum is that of South Sudan who had the authorization of the central government?

Almost all of these things are already explained in my book “It cannot be done” of the 2009, and all were confirmed .

Who wants to detail has a nice set of explanations here http://www.palmerini.net/blog/sovranita-veneta-lombarda-mantovana-friulana/

Why insist on a suicidal and illegal project ? Who wants a Venetian Statterial full of Italian debts and therefore slave of banks rather than a large Veneto with all the Lombard-Veneto state ?

Loris Palmerini

www.palmerini.net