The statute of Veneto prohibits the consultative referendum on independence!

Deflowering of the referendum movement for the independence of Veneto: The referendum is prohibited by the regional statute of 2012.

L’ Article 27 Statute concerns “Advisory referendum” And he says :

“1. The Regional Council may decide to call consultative referendums of the populations concerned on measures or proposals for measures falling within the Council's competence [..]”

In legal terms “measures for the Council” excludes all matters not assigned by the Constitution and the Statute, among which certain NOT C’ E’ The independence of the Region.

The point 3 further limits saying that “Consultative referendum is not allowed in the cases provided for by the article 26, paragraphs 4 and 5. " And what they say?

The point 4 Article 26 (that is invoked while still covering the referendums) dice :

“4. The referendum for repeal is not allowed:

b) of laws and regional acts whose contents constitute fulfillment of constitutional requirements, International

D) the laws and regulations concerning agreements or arrangements or other international regions;”

In short, the statute the Veneto Region allows a consultative referendum or repeal, but only for the skills and regional laws. E’ This is obvious. As is obvious that a municipality cannot’ repeal International Law, it can only implement it. The same applies to every local authority (common, province, region, area metropolitana).

You could study something else , invoking international rules to enforce to the region, And there are the solutions for autonomy such as Bolzano or to delete the stability pact. But the referendum movement and regional politicians who will not listen, come me, I felt that there was no legal margin for that referendum operation. About as 2 years said that the cancellation of the provinces was illegal, and was thus recognized by the Constitutional Court. Even before I unmasked the referendum for water, saying it was a scam that would have allowed the sale of public assets, What is happening ! Just connect the dots to understand that something not understand.

Unfortunately the referendum have been proposed as those who would do a State 4 E 4 otto, that they were genes with the solution in hand. And they did not have the humility to listen and take advantage of all the forces on the field that have been working on the field for many years, come me. Or maybe he just wanted to fool with an electoral program for the 2015 ?

In transmission Cantarutti of Venetian independence has repeatedly said that the referendum evaluation commission (desired by Zaia ) He was unanimous and in favor of the referendum and for his feasibility. The newspapers yesterday, Of today and weeks ago they say instead that the Commission has not given the ok at all. I do not know if Cantarutti mint or newspapers, but I did not grasp unanimity in the report of the commission that I read. E’ It is true, however, that Zaia also on Friday for the first time gave its full consent to the vote, as if he violates the statute. We will see who is lying and who does not know what it's about.

What is certain is that Cantrutti in transmission has shown that the statute is not and’ EVEN BEEN CONSIDERED the constraints that imposes. He asked own “THE STATUTE !!!???”

This element of the regional Statute ban, like other, was not taken into consideration by Commission that was totally in favor of feasibility. Cantrutti asked if I think I am more brain than him and the Professorons of the Commission. He called the “titles” Lawyer etc., When the lawyer actually swears loyalty “the interests of the nation” and not to the laws .

Thus ends the residual alleged legitimacy of the referendum and the path proposed by the political movements Veneto State, Independence Veneta, PLEBISCITE 2013, Venetian Raixe etc.. .Ends regarding a referendum path that passes through the region. In fact, the Region cannot represent a people, as the sentence has already clarified 365/2007 Constitutional Court.

In addition to “modest” Figure made by the Cantrutti Avv (which has contradicted several times during the debate, even not knowing how to explain fundamental things such as the fact that the Venetians are also in Venice-Friuli and Lombardy ), There is also a very nervous reaction of Morosin of Venetian independence that appeared on Saturday's Gazzettino 14.

The independentists know that the referendum fraud will finally be watched carefully on the sovereign and legal path of self -determination from below, by the people, started in 1999 and it follows on http://www.statoveneto.net . As soon as the Buriana will pass we will see those who really want independence and who only on the hunt for votes and prebends of the Italian occupant state.