The reason for “No” IN THE REFERENDUM 25 E 26 June 2006
In April 2006 I founded the “Clerks COMMITTEE FOR NO TO THE REFERENDUM 25 E 26 June 2006”
Here are the reasons I brought against patacca “devolution”.
Caution: the arguments given below were recorded and are subject to legal protection. Their dissemination is allowed as long as they are always accompanied by the quotation of the source ( www.autogoverno.net ) and the author “Loris Palmerini”.
The COMMITTEE referendum for the NO 25 E 26 June 2006 it consists of federalists, autonomists united against the so-called “devolution”, which will come into force if the no will not be the majority.
You are trying to silence pass a give citizens like an assent.
The reform of the Constitution adopted in 2005 by CDL, known as
LA DEVOLUTION, DO NOT MAKE A FISCAL FEDERALISM
but moreover
LA DEVOLUTION, NOT FROM’ MORE AUTONOMY TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES
Unlike, outrageously and configuring a scam, Instead of expanding the powers of local and regional government on the principle of’ SELF-GOVERNMENT provisions of international standards,
THE DEVOLUTION TAKES SOME MAJOR RESPONSIBILITIES OF REGIONAL WITHOUT NEW Darné .
E, differently from before,
With the Dolvution, regional competences are subjected to the veto of the national interest
with which any form of differentiated management can be stopped.
Overall it can be safely affirming that
And the DEVOLUTION’ DENIAL OF PRINCIPLES AND FEDERALISTS autonomists
THE DEVOLUTION OF CDL DOES GROW CENTRALISM,
The provisions of the Dintation is against the “European Charter of Local Self”, which instead recognizes already from 1986 the principle of Self-Government by providing a right to tax and management federalism, Without the possibility of reccentralize the competences except after a referendum of the Regions (see below).
The principle of self-government is now protected by’ art 117 the Constitution, And the European Charter is already ratified as a law by the Italian state.
With the new Article. 117
The Dolvolution takes away the obligation to recognize the principle of self-government in its legislation
because it removes the obligation to recognize these international acts (new Article 117), and then the European Charter Autonomy and Local Self-Government it will lose constitutional value thanks to the devolution (!)
E’ In short, a scam with which the international guarantees of local communities are actually reduced, and it realized a FURTHER CENTRALISM the Italian State, Moreover, submitting everything to national interest” which is in contrast to the European Charter.
Here are some examples.
DEVOUTION LESS WITH ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS OF COMMUNITY’ LOCALS
With the new paragraph 1 of art.117 modified by the devolution is repealed
the obligation of the state to respect international constraints, crippling
the application of those laws of the Council of Europe that protect the
local identities, linguistic minorities, local self -government, THE
landscape etc..
These rules and in particular the ETS No. 122 “The European autonomy card
locale” of the 1986, make down from 1986 fiscal federalism ! Absurd but
vero, but it simply does not respect these obligations, though
exist. Respect for these international rules is currently
mandatory and added to’ art. 117 of the Italian Constitution.
With the new Article 117 proposed by Devolution, the state loses'”obligation
International” to abide by these rules.
In fact, the Council of Europe (http://www.coe.int ) It is an organization
International EU that protects the economic and social human rights
Europeans, But the Council of Europe is not part of the European Union, BORN
of the Community system, nor of European binding law, nor of the UN (Certain rules of the Council of Europe are “recalled” in certain treaties on the European Union, but are not European laws).
The absence of the sentence “international obligation” reduces the rights of the autonomies because in practice it takes away the obligation to apply conventions (look down)
LESS RIGHTS FOR LANGUAGE MINORITIES
The elimination of the obligations of international law make non -binding
The rules of the Council of Europe on linguistic minorities.
LEGISLATIVE CENTRALISM
The creation of local rules issued by the local authorities is possible thanks to a series of international rules of the Council of Europe produced by 1977 onwards in Italy have been largely disregarded or NOT APPLY.
These standards, they already give important skills to local communities today and already realize’ Federalism and local self -government also in legal terms (European Charter of Local Self-Government). With devolution in subsection 1 of Article 117 the obligation of the State is eliminated, currently in force, to respect the acts of self-government bodies, And with this the state will take free hand against the interests of municipalities, regions and provinces.
What serious, with this legislative centralism could be possible the elimination of most “Human rights” of local communities and minorities in a few years.
national interest
The Dolvolution inserts the principle of national interest in the Constitution, currently absent, which makes it completely illusory every sphere of power granted to local authorities, as each activity of the same can be questioned by the central government behind the generic and ideological “national interest”. This principle is currently against the rules of the Council of Europe, But even these will no longer be mandatory thanks to legislative centralism (see above) that devolution
realizes.
CENTRALISM NEW SKILLS AND LOST FROM THE REGIONS
They are exempted from the regions the following skills :
1) credit protection : this competence include the important area of ​​local currencies as a form of consumer credit managed by municipalities and regions very much in use in France, Germany and USA, which serve to stimulate local economies. In Aspromonte and Rome are experimenting of local currencies, and they will be choked by devolution.
2) Common Market Organizations: It is likely that among these organizations the “joint purchasing groups” and cooperative organizations, non-profit aiming to create a chain released from large sales teams and purchasing. E’ likely that any common market organizations that use discount coupons will be submitted to state control.
3) It is subjected to the state regional administrative police.
4) The general rules on safety and food quality protection will go to the regions, disappearing many typical products
5) The State will be able to oblige the municipalities on the large strategic transport and navigation networks and the related safety standards, determining possible very serious environmental disasters such as Vajont without communities being able.
6) More centralized rules for the system of communication
7) The system of intellectual professions will be centralized, giving rise to a new brain migration and impossible’ of the regions of designing intermediate figures for their needs
8) The sporting system will be nationalized just after the football scandal that demonstrates how a centralized system can become a Moggi system to the detriment of everyone.
DEVOLUTION WITH LESS RIGHTS FOR CITIZENS : NO VOTES !
The Chairman of the Committee
Loris Palmerini (Cell. 3471416187)
The committee seeks provincial and regional representatives in the dissemination of information in the media.
Caution: The topics below have been recorded and are subjected to legal protection their dissemination is allowed but must be absolutely accompanied by the quotation of the source ( www.autogoverno.net ) and the author “Loris Palmerini”.
European Charter of local autonomies Stce n ° : 122
European Charter of Regional or Minority Languages Stce n ° : 148